- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Jackson, MS collects only 56% of its billed water utility money.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:11 am
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:11 am
And of course none of the usual “bipartisan” state media will touch it because the republican supermajority is not to blame.
The state not handing them money is, of course, raciss.
The state not handing them money is, of course, raciss.
quote:
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Mississippi's capital is collecting only a little more than half of the money it bills for water use, far below the rate at which most American cities obtain such fees, Jackson's federally appointed water manager said Monday.
Ted Henifin, appointed in November by a federal court to help improve Jackson’s troubled water system, told reporters the city is collecting about 56 per cent of the water fees it issues. That compares to an industry-standard above 95 per cent, he said. The uncollected bills equate to about $50 million a year in lost revenue for the city, where roughly a quarter of residents live in poverty.
The revenue losses sharpen the financial strain of the hefty debt burden Jackson faces for its water system.
“We need to get our financial house in order for the water system," Henifin said. "In order to do that, we have to get the debt off the books.”
The city needs to pay down about $280 million in outstanding debt on the water system. About $23 million of that is private bond debt the city must pay annually, Henifin said. On top of the debt, the city needs enough dollars for costly improvements to a water system that has fallen into disrepair.
Repeated breakdowns in Jackson have caused many in the city of about 150,000 residents to go days and weeks at a time without safe running water. Last August and September, people waited in lines for water to drink, bathe, cook and flush toilets.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:14 am to CleverUserName
I wonder why that is.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:14 am to CleverUserName
ANC is awesome with this stuff as well.
It's amazing they have had so many problems (and deep deep problems) yet nothing changes. Surprised the Bidenites haven't sent an army down there to at least act like they are fixing it.
It's amazing they have had so many problems (and deep deep problems) yet nothing changes. Surprised the Bidenites haven't sent an army down there to at least act like they are fixing it.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:14 am to CleverUserName
Chokwe Lumumba advocated for a new African republic in Jackson. He’s getting his wish.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:14 am to CleverUserName
Environmental racism, so they claim.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:15 am to CleverUserName
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:16 am to CleverUserName
I doubt the city runs the water utility. I know for things cities do run like parking, traffic tickets, and ambulance rides the collection rates are horrible almost everywhere.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:17 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Jackson, MS collects only 56% of its billed water utility money.
Better than NOLA. The Carrollton Water Treatment Pant on the east bank of NOLA produces 110 million gallons of water per day. They meter half that at homes and businesses.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:18 am to Motownsix
quote:
I doubt the city runs the water utility.
Is this your first time hearing about Jackson's water woes? If you're really flexible with the meaning of the word, yes, they "run" the water utility.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 10:27 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Ted Henifin, appointed in November by a federal court to help improve Jackson’s troubled water system, told reporters the city is collecting about 56 per cent of the water fees it issues.
I am surprised 56% of Jackson, MS residents pay for anything at all.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:09 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Bidenites haven't sent an army down there to at least act like they are fixing it.
They did. They came down with gritted teeth and red faces to wholly blame republicans leadership at the state.
They left with their tail between their legs and disappointment they were not able to after people began asking where certain money was.
They left a guy in charge of the water system, referenced in the article, with the instructions of “do the best you can and give us anything we can use against republicans.”
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:10 am to rpg37
quote:
Repeated breakdowns in Jackson have caused many in the city of about 150,000 residents to go days and weeks at a time without safe running water. Last August and September, people waited in lines for water to drink, bathe, cook and flush toilets.
You need safe water to flush a toilet?
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:11 am to Motownsix
quote:
I doubt the city runs the water utility.
You would be incorrect.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:12 am to CleverUserName
Paying your bills is racist
Everyone knows this
Everyone knows this
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:18 am to CleverUserName
I have a colleague that lives in Jackson proper. Her and her husband live in the Belhaven area.
They will go months without receiving a water bill, then get a $900 bill. Then a few months without a bill, and then a $600 bill.
They are smart enough to just budget their money accordingly, but most people aren't. Then the city decided that they wouldn't cut off water for non-payment and a whole class of citizens just stopped paying their bills.
This pains my conservative heart, but this is a mess that the government of Jackson created that needs the state to step in and fix. Not by forgiving the bills (which is what the city wants).
The best suggestion I have seen is to take the unpaid bills and divide over 60 months and add it to the current bill at no interest. State can float the money and be repaid over 5-7 years.
User owes $6000 in unpaid bills. Bill is $100 a month. Bill for next five years is $200 a month. That is required to keep service. After five years, the bill decreases to $100 a month.
What the city of Jackson wants the state to do.
We have 50,000 people who owe $250 million in back water bills. Give us $250 million.
They will go months without receiving a water bill, then get a $900 bill. Then a few months without a bill, and then a $600 bill.
They are smart enough to just budget their money accordingly, but most people aren't. Then the city decided that they wouldn't cut off water for non-payment and a whole class of citizens just stopped paying their bills.
This pains my conservative heart, but this is a mess that the government of Jackson created that needs the state to step in and fix. Not by forgiving the bills (which is what the city wants).
The best suggestion I have seen is to take the unpaid bills and divide over 60 months and add it to the current bill at no interest. State can float the money and be repaid over 5-7 years.
User owes $6000 in unpaid bills. Bill is $100 a month. Bill for next five years is $200 a month. That is required to keep service. After five years, the bill decreases to $100 a month.
What the city of Jackson wants the state to do.
We have 50,000 people who owe $250 million in back water bills. Give us $250 million.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:19 am to CleverUserName
Is there a minority run city that is not rife with waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement?
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:21 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Jackson, MS collects only 56% of its billed water utility money.
This is common in towns with corrupt mayors. They don't collect utility payments in exchange for support/votes.
Meanwhile the infrastructure starts failing and budget shortfalls become a huge problem. Eventually major repairs and maintenance are left deferred - but by then the mayor is term limited.
Sadly this happened in a few towns in Louisiana who participate in a co-op for electricity. It went on until the provider threatened to shut the entire town off.
This post was edited on 6/6/23 at 11:24 am
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:32 am to CleverUserName
Didn’t Siemens rip the city off on a contract to install electronic meters that wouldn’t require site visits to read the meters? Didn’t they just bungle the whole thing? I support criticism of government when due, and it is clearly due here, but you also gotta think about the vulture contractors that prey on government.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:44 am to SquaringCircles
quote:
Didn’t Siemens rip the city off on a contract to install electronic meters that wouldn’t require site visits to read the meters? Didn’t they just bungle the whole thing? I support criticism of government when due, and it is clearly due here, but you also gotta think about the vulture contractors that prey on government.
They got a huge settlement from that and promptly spent the money on not fixing the problem. They spent it on other things.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 11:46 am to CleverUserName
It’s really quite hilarious that blak leadership can’t do anything without fricking it up.
Popular
Back to top
