- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

JPSO used facial recognition technology to arrest a man. The tech was wrong.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:03 am
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:03 am
LINK

quote:
But a recent attempt by the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office to nab a high-end purse thief via facial recognition ended badly for a Georgia man who was jailed for almost a week over a false match, his lawyer says.
A detective took the algorithm at face value to secure a warrant to arrest Randal Reid, 28, in the June theft of luxury purses from a Metairie consignment shop, attorney Tommy Calogero said.
A Baton Rouge Police Department detective then adopted JPSO’s identification of Reid to secure an arrest warrant alleging he was among three men involved in another luxury purse theft the same week at a shop on Jefferson Highway, court records show.
quote:
Local police pulled over Reid on Nov. 25 as he drove on Interstate 20 in Dekalb County, Georgia, headed to a late Thanksgiving celebration with his mother, he said.
“They told me I had a warrant out of Jefferson Parish. I said, ‘What is Jefferson Parish?,’” Reid said. “I have never been to Louisiana a day in my life. Then they told me it was for theft. So not only have I not been to Louisiana, I also don’t steal.”
Reid was booked into the DeKalb County jail as a fugitive but was let go on Dec. 1, a jail official said. Calogero said JPSO detectives “tacitly” admitted the error and rescinded the July warrant.
quote:
Sheriff Joe Lopinto’s office did not respond to several requests for information on Reid’s arrest and release, the agency’s use of facial recognition or any safeguards around it.
quote:
Baton Rouge police also did not respond to questions about its warrant for Reid’s arrest.

Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:05 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Is it less reliable than an eyewitness?
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:05 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
My man is about to get slapped with the meaty dick of qualified immunity.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Is it less reliable than an eyewitness?
Good question.
Eyewitnesses are pretty unreliable.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:10 am to TrueTiger
quote:Indeed.
Is it less reliable than an eyewitness?quote:
Good question. Eyewitnesses are pretty unreliable.
This technology simply assisted them in finding a potential suspect. Apparently, he was cleared.
The interesting question is whether an arrest warrant should’ve issued based solely upon the facial ID algorithm. I would argue against the validity of that procedure
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 10:16 am
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:11 am to TrueTiger
Eyewitnesses can renege or be cross-examined. Will this always be possible with algorithms?
Now who has been opening my phone?
Now who has been opening my phone?
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:14 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
We still can't make lie detectors that work. The best ones get it right in controlled tests 60% of the time. 50% can be achieved by flipping a coin.
That's why they aren't allowed as evidence in court.
That's why they aren't allowed as evidence in court.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:17 am to Zach
quote:have you watched “the Recruit?“
We still can't make lie detectors that work. The best ones get it right in controlled tests 60% of the time. 50% can be achieved by flipping a coin.
“How valid is a test that can be affected by clenching your sphincter? Clinched! Unclench!“ (As the needle bounces across the printer page.)
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 10:18 am
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:20 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I watched a cop show in the last year where they arrested a black man based on this same technology.
In the show, the technology was found to be faulty with a much higher fault rate for black men than others.
In the show, the technology was found to be faulty with a much higher fault rate for black men than others.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:30 am to AggieHank86
I have found that those who are invested in time and or money into both facial recognition and lie detector testing will claim the technology is a lot more accurate than it really is.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:30 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
It is understandable to have an algorithm search through a database of photos for potential matches but to serve as the basis for an arrest warrant is over the top. Multiple confirmations must be made or the state will run rough sod over people. What if the guy resists and gets shot dead by authorities? Does machine code swear out arrest warrants now? What photos are searched, driver licenses? Why does Dekalb county Georgia roll over on such a weak case?
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:35 am to AggieHank86
quote:
have you watched “the Recruit?“ “How valid is a test that can be affected by clenching your sphincter? Clinched! Unclench!“ (As the needle bounces across the printer page.)
Haven't seen it. I had personal experience in the 70s with pulse and breathing. Then in the 80s I studied the 'new improved' voice detection but it was only marginally better.
The tests were simple. The operator would ask questions that the test subject would know but the operator did not:
Q: 'What is your date of birth?'
A: 'March 2, 1970'
Q: 'Machine says truth.'
A: 'It's false. It's March 3, 1970'
The test subject would alternate telling the truth and lying and the machine was horrible.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:43 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
a high-end purse thief
the hell is this?
only purse snatching from cliche white woman the "onoxioulsy rich looking" woman from 1980's movies?

Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:43 am to NineLineBind
quote:
Eyewitnesses can renege or be cross-examined. Will this always be possible with algorithms?
You would need a software engineer to attack the algorithms.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:53 am to bizeagle
quote:simple. 2 reasons. they want La to do the same and great way to pad their stats for future promotions.
Why does Dekalb county Georgia roll over on such a weak case?
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 11:01 am
Posted on 1/2/23 at 10:56 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
All involved in this arrest need to be imprisoned.
Popular
Back to top

7













