Started By
Message
locked post

SF Giants land Correa

Posted on 12/14/22 at 12:03 am
Posted by Leon Spinks
Texas
Member since Aug 2016
2329 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 12:03 am
13 years 350 million. LINK
Posted by Tomherman
Member since Sep 2016
2053 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 12:22 am to
Clown world.
Posted by TrapperJohn
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
12164 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 12:31 am to
13 year contract for a brittle 28 year old? Good for him I guess.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 12:41 am to
MLB GM’s have lost their minds

I was glad the Astros didn’t go 6 or 7, these fools go double that. This feels like LSU bidding against itself in recent years on assistant coaches
Posted by potofgold12
Member since Nov 2022
31 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 1:34 am to
Boras does it again and milks out a contract for another one of his players. The front office in San Fran is crazy imo to offer 13/350 for a man who is 28. Next time Correa is a free agent he'll be 41
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
81906 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 4:13 am to
What a joke
Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
8733 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 4:35 am to
Worse than the Trea Turner deal
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12960 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 4:48 am to
Crazy deal, but I hope Correa goes nuts in SF, especially when they play the Dodgers. Dodgers fans wanted to be all high and mighty and not sign Correa because he was on the 2017 Astros roster.

Well now they get to see him 19 times a year for the next 13 years.
Posted by Domeskeller
Astrodome
Member since Jun 2020
9694 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 5:02 am to
Actually, just 13 times a year. Baseball reduced the number of intradivision games starting in 2023 to accommodate every team playing every other team every year.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60795 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 5:27 am to
quote:

This feels like LSU bidding against itself in recent years on assistant coaches


what a ridiculous comparison. You realize multiple teams have been doing this? The length is apparently to avoid the luxury tax by spreading out the years. I do agree it’s insane to have deals that long, will be interesting to see what impact that has down the line with a bunch of 40 year olds still under contract
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12433 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 5:53 am to
quote:

Well now they get to see him 19 times a year for the next 13 years.

No
Balanced schedule.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12960 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 6:16 am to
quote:

Actually, just 13 times a year.

Ah, didn't know they changed it. Still, that's 169 potential games over the life of that contract.

I know he has injury issues, but damn it I hope he stays healthy enough to be a thorn in the side of LA. It would just be too damn funny to watch Dodgers fans pull their hair out while this guy torments them for the next 13 years.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 6:17 am to
quote:

what a ridiculous comparison. You realize multiple teams have been doing this? The length is apparently to avoid the luxury tax by spreading out the years.


You can slice it up however you want. They’re paying $350 million and 13 years to an often hurt shortstop that has never performed to his potential. You wanna call it a 10 year deal, even better, you just paid that same player $35 million a year for 10 years. It’s all the same.
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
41197 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 6:22 am to
Something will be done about this luxury tax manipulation with the years at some point. No chance all these shortstops are playing into their 40s. It’s essentially deferred money with a stipulation that if these guys are somehow still fit into their 40s that they can only play for them. I bet all 3 of these shortstops will be DFA’d before their last couple seasons. These teams are just sacrificing 20M+ of dead money in these last 2-3 years of these deals when the thresholds will be higher to save $10M a year for the first 10 years. Very interesting strategy but can’t see MLB sitting by and letting this go on next offseason.

Somebody will give Ohtani half a billion and only be paying $30M a year against the tax if this is allowed to continue
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 6:25 am
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 6:29 am to
Astros will take Jeremy Peña 700k FTW
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:00 am to
quote:

13 year contract for a brittle 28 year old? Good for him I guess


These long contracts aren’t any different from deferred contracts. The Nationals paid Max Scherzer $15 million for 14 years. It was just framed as a 7 year, $210 million contract even though the contract terms were very different. It’s a better deal for the team than the 10 year, $325 million deal Corey Seager got from the Rangers and certainly the 10 year, $341 million deal Lindor got from the Mets.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
17768 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:11 am to
quote:

MLB GM’s have lost their minds


Yep, they are doing it to themselves setting the market at this ridiculous standard and they and the rest of baseball will pay for it.

Yes many owners have, they have them money to spend and as the Padres owner says, you can't take it with you. But Geez.

Cub fans are going to rebel if they don't get Swanson. Cubs convention in January could get real ugly if Ricketts and Jed Hoyer show up without one of those four SS's in tow. But I don't blame them for not doing the 11-13 year deals...they will still get blasted anyway.

The narrative will be and already is, they should signed one early and set the market, as if other teams would not have counter-offered anyway.
Posted by Horsemeat
2025 Contributor Of The Year
Member since Dec 2014
15226 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:12 am to
In 3 or 4 years he'll be the full time DH. His back isn't gonna hold up to justify that contract. Baseball free agency has gone full retard.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
103534 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:16 am to
quote:

No chance all these shortstops are playing into their 40s.


They will be DH or 1B by the second half of these deals.
Posted by DiamondDog
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2019
12820 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:21 am to
I think you're forgetting what should be the main gripe.

He just isn't that good to warrant the contract.

Ohtani gonna break records. $700M?
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 7:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram