- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let’s Discuss Filing as S Corp vs SP
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:41 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:41 am
I’m far from an expert here, so set me straight if my logic is flawed:
The wife (no pics) is moving into a contract role in fundraising effective 1/1/23, and I’m encouraging her to file for the S corp election straightaway. We changed over to a new CPA last year, who is saying the hassle isn’t worth the benefit, but I’m not sure I agree.
Assume the LLC has a net income of $120K, she takes an $80K salary (which is in line with her prior fundraising gig) and the $40K balance in distributions. That’s just north of $6K savings in FICA/Medicare payments. If she doesn’t want to deal with the payroll and unemployment bit, she can hire a payroll service to take care of the logistics and still come out ahead by my calculations. Is our new CPA just being too conservative or lazy here? What else am I missing?
The wife (no pics) is moving into a contract role in fundraising effective 1/1/23, and I’m encouraging her to file for the S corp election straightaway. We changed over to a new CPA last year, who is saying the hassle isn’t worth the benefit, but I’m not sure I agree.
Assume the LLC has a net income of $120K, she takes an $80K salary (which is in line with her prior fundraising gig) and the $40K balance in distributions. That’s just north of $6K savings in FICA/Medicare payments. If she doesn’t want to deal with the payroll and unemployment bit, she can hire a payroll service to take care of the logistics and still come out ahead by my calculations. Is our new CPA just being too conservative or lazy here? What else am I missing?
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:45 am to GeauxldMember
I'd think she'd need a higher income but I'm far from an expert.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:14 am to Billy Blanks
quote:
I'd think she'd need a higher income
NOPE
quote:
but I'm far from an expert.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:22 am to GeauxldMember
quote:
she takes an $80K salary
lower salary if need be just make sure it is justified
regardless youa re paying no payroll tax on the dividend side AND with all the deductions the employee side can apply to the dividend side you might have no tax period on that distribution. so no payroll or fed or state if she keeps that salary and that dividend money is correct. I have had down years and filing S -corp has always been worth it and saved me a ton in taxes on dividend side.
and to top it off tell her to get a solo401k and max it out and it will lower your income tax on the employee side as well.
just get a payroll company to do the work. easy to do. write your salary, make damn sure her employee contributions are in for your last payroll and are on the W-2 the payroll company will give you. you have until 3-15 for the employer profit sharing contribution side.
I am about to run my last payroll of the year myself. whatever i get from now til end of year will be added to my dividends.
yeah you really need to look at all the payroll and income tax you save on the dividend side because of all your employee deductions since you are the owner. That 40k will be basically tax free. the 80k taxable salary(income tax) can be severely lowered IF she throws a nice employee contribution at it. WIN-WIN.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 11:32 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 12:57 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
with all the deductions the employee side can apply to the dividend side you might have no tax period on that distribution. so no payroll or fed or state if she keeps that salary and that dividend money is correct.
quote:
you really need to look at all the payroll and income tax you save on the dividend side because of all your employee deductions since you are the owner. That 40k will be basically tax free. the 80k taxable salary(income tax) can be severely lowered IF she throws a nice employee contribution at it. WIN-WIN.
You’re going to have to elaborate here. The distribution would be free of the 15.3% “self employment tax” that goes to FICA and Medicare, but it’s still subject to federal and state income tax.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:06 pm to GeauxldMember
quote:
but it’s still subject to federal and state income tax.
never said it was not. you need to lookup what is DEDUCTIBLE towards the BUSINESS SIDE. Those deductions alone can WIPE OUT me owing any INCOME taxes on the dividend distribution side. THEN you will see what i am talking about. you will be amazed. I already laid it out for you. Has your CPA not filled you in on what is DEDUCTIBLE on the business side?
Jeeez you are getting screwed royally if not.
your wife's salary ALONE would wipe out any taxes on her dividend based on your numbers that is without the employer side payroll deduction, employee mileage reimbursement, cell phone, internet, home office, and on and on and on.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:13 pm to Fat Bastard
The $120K is the LLC’s assumed net income, so that’s after all of the business expenses, reimbursements, etc.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:16 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
Has your CPA not filled you in on what is DEDUCTIBLE on the business side? Jeeez you are getting screwed royally if not.
This here. If your CPA has not walked you through this already, you may need to consider finding a new CPA. Not a tax person, but there is a lot of extra deductions you can consider when SE. different setups will give you different benefits. Knowing all the ins and outs before starting can really help set you up for some significant savings, but you need a CPA that has the knowledge and the ability to explain it to you. This could be outside your current CPA’s comfort area
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:28 pm to GeauxldMember
you need to use GROSS numbers so we can see how the writeoffs would affect you. Are you sure you did this right? Those numbers make no sense. How did you do NET for business without incorporating the employee salary deduction, etc?
give me the GROSS INCOME of company
then SALARY which is pulled from gross and done via payroll
then what is left on your K1/dividend.
you must be calculating this using a sole proprietor model and not a S-corp. There is no salary with a SP. You do above the line deductions for company/SP NET income which is only way to reduce SE tax using that model then you can use below the line contributions to reduce income tax for a SP.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:30 pm to GeauxldMember
quote:
Is our new CPA just being too conservative
If the IRS actually hires 87K new employees (I have some doubt as to how quickly / if at all this will happen, considering they have tons of unfilled jobs now and a huge wave of retirements is about to hit the service) then there are clear signals that they are going to start looking much harder at reasonable compensation in an S Corp.
The reasonable compensation / distribtuion concept is simple: In an S Corp, a owner wears two hats - owner and employee. What represents the return on an owner's investment and overhead - over and above what she would have as an employee - and her role as managing the company.
The reality is this: Your wife has a contract job. Her risk is the same as that of an employee. She is not (I assume, correct me if I am wrong) investing anything in this business. She won't have any employees.
She's getting 120K and not 80K becausw she's not getting benefits, the company doesn't have to pay payroll tax on her, and her expenses won't be reimbursed - she can write them off instead.
The correct amount that should be allocated to distributions is approximately zero.
The single member, no employee, professional services S Corp is one of the biggest tax cheats around. (It's not tax avoidance... it's cheating). The IRS has basically ignored this for 30 years because they didn't have the resources to go after it. This isn't something you can do by computer or by mail... the IRS actually has to audit - good ole fashioned in office audit - to deal with this.
And they don't have the current resources to deal with that to collect 6K a year.
But... as the number of CPAs has gone down over the years, they are in more demand... which means they can charge more and be more risk-adverse.
I'm sure you can find a CPA out there who will take this own. But those numbers are going down.
By the way... my S Corp fees start at $2,500 for federal and one state return. A full service payroll firm is going to prob charge $100/month for payroll and payroll tax returns. (She can save money on that by using an assisted, not full service, such as what QuickBooks payroll offers). That's still $2,300 a year to the good - so I understand the desire.
My professional reccomendation has always been, S Corp makes sense once net income before owner compensation is $100K. Your wife would pass that requirement.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:31 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
Has your CPA not filled you in on what is DEDUCTIBLE on the business side?
She gets the same business deductions whether she is an S Corp or filing a Schedule C.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:37 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
my S Corp fees start at $2,500
f that
mine charges 500 for personal and 500 for company
quote:
A full service payroll firm is going to prob charge $100/month
mine is 45 bucks a month. was only 25 for ages then they went up.
quote:
S Corp is one of the biggest tax cheats around. (It's not tax avoidance... it's cheating).
melt!
Posted on 12/9/22 at 1:44 pm to LSUFanHouston
ummm no. there is no salary to deduct from a SP. it is just above the line deductions to get to your net income. then of course contributions thereafter. there was no dividend side when i was a SP like now. But i can with S-corp filing. you are thinking of mileage deduction for SP or employee mileage reimbursement in the S-corp or the same half of payroll tax deduction for SP and s-corp, in that case that is correct.
LINK
LINK
quote:
Using draws is the only option for sole proprietors — you cannot legally pay yourself a W-2 salary. That’s because paying yourself a salary isn’t a deductible expense for tax purposes when you’re a sole proprietor.
quote:
The good news is that your salary and the 7.65% of FICA tax the S-corp pays on your salary is tax deductible and will reduce the company’s taxable income.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 2:06 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
mine charges 500 for personal and 500 for company
Considering all of the things you have said you have going on... either you have the best deal in the country, or I'd really question the quality of the service you are getting.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 2:17 pm to Fat Bastard
FWIW OP my information from my CPA's is very much in line with LSUFanhouston and his advice on here has always been solid. He's clearly a CPA and maybe conservative, but FB is not either of those.
I have ran into the same issues with CPA's being ultra conservative. I've never pushed the issue myself though or sought out others, it does seem as though a lot of advice online is in line with FB's thoughts here.
As mentioned you should consider the retirement savings of both, what fits you better. YOu should also know that banks don't like to loan to Self Employed. So filing as an S corp increases your W-2 salary and makes you "look" better to banks and loan officers. Just something to consider.
The reality is if you are just talking $4000-5000 in tax savings by having to jump through a lot of hoops and do a bunch of work, I don't think CPA's think its worth their time or effort even if they bring in $2500+ more in work.
I have ran into the same issues with CPA's being ultra conservative. I've never pushed the issue myself though or sought out others, it does seem as though a lot of advice online is in line with FB's thoughts here.
As mentioned you should consider the retirement savings of both, what fits you better. YOu should also know that banks don't like to loan to Self Employed. So filing as an S corp increases your W-2 salary and makes you "look" better to banks and loan officers. Just something to consider.
The reality is if you are just talking $4000-5000 in tax savings by having to jump through a lot of hoops and do a bunch of work, I don't think CPA's think its worth their time or effort even if they bring in $2500+ more in work.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 2:17 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
ummm no. there is no salary to deduct from a SP.
Umm.
You do understand you get taxed on your salary, right?
You are moving it from Schedule C, to Line 1 of the 1040.
And you are pauying payroll tax (same as SE Tax) on that salary.
So again... no bottom line difference.
quote:
That’s because paying yourself a salary isn’t a deductible expense for tax purposes when you’re a sole proprietor.
Correct. Not what we are disussing.
quote:
The good news is that your salary and the 7.65% of FICA tax the S-corp pays on your salary is tax deductible and will reduce the company’s taxable income
S/E tax is based on 92.35% of SE income, and you get an income tax deduction for half of it.
S corp employees receives $100K Salary. Employee pays $7,650 in FICA, and company takes $7,650 deduction. Total tax paid by employee and employer - $15,300. Company gets a write off totaling $107,650, employee gets to pay income tax on $100,000, total net write off $7,650.
SP has $100K in net income. SE Tax is 15.3% times 92.35% of 100K, S/E tax is $14,130. Total net write off is one half of S/E tax or $7,065.
So yes... the S Corp gets a bigger deducution, but THAT'S BECASUE THEY PAID MORE MONEY IN TAX.
If you want to give me $1, I'll gladly give you a 33 cent tax deduction... but you will still be out 67 cents.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 2:20 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
you have until 3-15 for the employer profit sharing contribution side.
pretty sure as an s corp its based on a % of her salary. So while yes, they have until then to make it you want to run enough payroll before year end to give yourself the ability to truly maximize it
Posted on 12/9/22 at 2:22 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
y professional reccomendation has always been, S Corp makes sense once net income before owner compensation is $100K.
always been our rule of thumb too
Posted on 12/9/22 at 2:50 pm to baldona
quote:
it does seem as though a lot of advice online is in line with FB's thoughts here.
No doubt. Written by a lot of people who don't have to sign a tax return with a license.
A lot of the info online tends to be incomplete... just like the with the backdoor Roth (totally legal but online forgets about the pro-rata rule).
quote:
Ou should also know that banks don't like to loan to Self Employed. So filing as an S corp increases your W-2 salary and makes you "look" better to banks and loan officers. Just something to consider
10 years ago I would 100 percent agree with this. But lately, this young grouof of bank officers don't have any concept of what a K-1 / S Corp return is, either. A person getting distributions AND salary is not something they understand.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 3:10 pm to GeauxldMember
I think the big thing you're currently missing is the QBI deduction (depending on your income if you are phased out, etc). If not above thresholds, inside an S Corp only the 40K would be eligible for the 20% QBI Deduction, whereas as on a Schedule C, the full 120K would.
Popular
Back to top

6





