- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/30/22 at 9:03 am to FlyingTiger1955
quote:“Technicalities” like violations of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, right?
Judges … need to catch hell for letting these bastards walk on … some idiotic technicality.
Damn those judges!
Posted on 9/30/22 at 9:09 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The simple fact is that most prosecutors plea weak cases down because they would rather put a bad guy in jail and get him off the street for a while than take a chance trying a weak case, losing it and putting that criminal on the street scot-free.
I specifically referenced that. But, that has nothing to do with my point you referenced. You are deflecting.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 9:13 am to the808bass
quote:Both are withholding justice, but the latter is doing so with intent to harm.
Choosing to not prosecute a serious crime that ethically should be prosecuted is the same as prosecuting an innocent person.
Attempted burglary is a crime. Attempted rape is a crime. Attempted murder is a crime. Attempting to jail, successfully jailing, or preventing prison release of an obviously innocent man should be a crime.
This post was edited on 9/30/22 at 9:29 am
Posted on 9/30/22 at 9:49 am to moneyg
I guess I was still focused upon the OP. My bad.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 10:11 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
In fact the lead prosecutor is now working with a firm in personal injury,
Sounds perfect for it; no ethics required.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 10:16 am to cwill
quote:
Your not honestly addressing my point. Not sure how you could misunderstand.
Yes, I did.
You said:
quote:
The default on both sides
If you wanted to limit your point to only what the OP proposed, you should have specified that.
Words aren't hard. Use them correctly next time.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)