- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/16/22 at 3:41 pm to SEClint
quote:
is it illegal to hide cameras in your own house?
Depends on location. Camera in the kitchen, no problem. Camera in the guest bathroom pointing at the shower, problem.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 3:42 pm to SEClint
This is what I’m thinking.
So if you have cameras set up in your house (not the bathroom) and someone gets undressed in one of the rooms, is that voyeurism?
The bathroom thing I can understand but this shite arse article is poorly written
So if you have cameras set up in your house (not the bathroom) and someone gets undressed in one of the rooms, is that voyeurism?
The bathroom thing I can understand but this shite arse article is poorly written
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:00 pm to fr33manator
quote:
You do have the right to record video inside your home without telling anyone, but—well, there are two big buts. The first: You can’t record video in any location where a person would expect to have a high degree of privacy. Those places should be pretty obvious, as noted earlier—bedrooms and bathrooms are clear examples, as is a changing room if you have a pool. But what if a guest is sleeping on your sofa, and likely using that room to dress? The author of this Fusion article describes that very situation: A person sleeping on a friend’s sofa for a few weeks discovered that she was being recorded by a Dropcam (the precursor to the Nest Cam). The situation is murky, because although it was a living room—the most public room in a home—it served as a de facto bedroom for the time the guest was using it. What makes this case even murkier is the technology involved.
Also, I think it turns into a wiretapping issue if you record audio.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:03 pm to Cymry Teigr
quote:
The irony of 3 out of the 6 links under that story on WBRZ being ads for cameras you literally just screw into a socket:
One day everyone here will understand how targeted advertising works.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:09 pm to Shexter
quote:
But what if a guest is sleeping on your sofa, and likely using that room to dress? The author of this Fusion article describes that very situation: A person sleeping on a friend’s sofa for a few weeks discovered that she was being recorded by a Dropcam (the precursor to the Nest Cam). The situation is murky, because although it was a living room—the most public room in a home—it served as a de facto bedroom for the time the guest was using it. What makes this case even murkier is the technology involved.
Well this makes it even more confusing.
So if I put a nanny cam in the living room, and the babysitter takes her clothes off and does her BF on the couch, suddenly I’d be at fault?
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:12 pm to fr33manator
quote:
if I put a nanny cam in the living room, and the babysitter takes her clothes off and does her BF on the couch
Sounds like I have seen the inside of your house on one of those free internet sites.
What color is your couch and what color is your babysitters hair?
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:13 pm to fr33manator
quote:
although it was a living room—the most public room in a home—it served as a de facto bedroom for the time the guest was using it.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:14 pm to fr33manator
It probably depends on what you do with the video at that point. If you share it with others, there's probably some sort of expectation of privacy that you're violating. If you just delete it, or hell if you just keep it but keep it to yourself, then I'm sure you're fine.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:19 pm to Epic Cajun
FWIW, Ive never used a nanny cam nor do I employ sexy babysitters. It’s just a hypothetical.
It just seems like a can of worms on what you can and can’t record inside your own home.
Like a scenario where you have hidden cameras set up in your own bedroom (wasn’t that a whole premise in the show Coupling?) and then an underage thief breaks in and takes off all their clothes in your bedroom, and screws your pillow or something, you couldn’t possibly be arrested for that could you?
It just seems like a can of worms on what you can and can’t record inside your own home.
Like a scenario where you have hidden cameras set up in your own bedroom (wasn’t that a whole premise in the show Coupling?) and then an underage thief breaks in and takes off all their clothes in your bedroom, and screws your pillow or something, you couldn’t possibly be arrested for that could you?
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:23 pm to Shexter
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:24 pm to fr33manator
LP has more perverts per capita
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:28 pm to fr33manator
quote:
The way it’s worded is kind of confusing.
That's becoming more and more standard for today's "journalism".
Posted on 8/16/22 at 4:31 pm to sqerty
quote:
LP got more perverts per capita
I thought so until I looked at Washington Parish
quote:
Livingston Parish is part of the Baton Rouge metropolitan area. At the 2010 census, the population was 128,026
quote:
Offenders Registry Statistics For Livingston Parish, LA
Our database shows there are 296 registered Sex Offender or Child Predators in Livingston Parish, LA, a ratio of 22.43 Sex Offender or Child Predators per 10,000 residents. This is higher than the national average of 15.68 Sex Offender or Child Predators per 10,000 residents.
Washington Parish Population 46,325 (2020)
quote:
Offenders Registry Statistics For Washington Parish, LA
Our database shows there are 230 registered Sex Offender or Child Predators in Washington Parish, LA, a ratio of 48.98 Sex Offender or Child Predators per 10,000 residents. This is higher than the national average of 15.68 Sex Offender or Child Predators per 10,000 residents.
Franklinton and Bogalusa
Posted on 8/17/22 at 9:00 am to Shexter
Update:
quote:
DENHAM SPRINGS - Security cameras are visible from the outside of the home where a woman says 38-year-old Christopher Johnson installed a secret camera that looks like a cell phone charger in the bathroom they used to share.
The woman tells WBRZ she lived in the home with Johnson until he moved out in July of 2021.
She says a couple months after he moved out, he gave her an SD card he thought contained pictures of a deceased family member.
Instead, she says she found hundreds of videos of her, her mother, their children and other guests using the bathroom. Johnson is facing 40 counts of video voyeurism stemming from the hidden camera.
"Video Voyeurism is a crime in Louisiana. It prohibits the video taping of folks when they don't know it," attorney Chase Tettleton with Babcock Injury Lawyers said.
Tettleton explained the law backing the charges. He explained even with Johnson owning the house, laws don't allow someone, like a guest, to be secretly recorded in a bathroom.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 9:08 am to Shexter
quote:
laws don't allow someone, like a guest, to be secretly recorded in a bathroom
As it should be. I'm not sure what some don't seem to be getting here.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 9:09 am to Shexter
quote:
She says a couple months after he moved out, he gave her an SD card he thought contained pictures of a deceased family member. Instead, she says she found hundreds of videos of her, her mother, their children and other guests using the bathroom. Johnson is facing 40 counts of video voyeurism stemming from the hidden camera.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 9:09 am to Shexter
This post was edited on 8/17/22 at 9:10 am
Posted on 8/17/22 at 9:44 am to Shexter
He should be thrown off a bridge butttt
is ridiculous. Murderers have 50-100k bonds sometimes.
quote:
Held on $1M bond for video voyeurism
is ridiculous. Murderers have 50-100k bonds sometimes.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:04 am to Shexter
quote:
"Video Voyeurism is a crime in Louisiana. It prohibits the video taping of folks when they don't know it
This seems like a terribly written law. It has to depend on context, right? Otherwise you’d have to notify thieves they were being filmed or they’d have a case against you
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News