- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CNN predictably downplaying Greenwood citizen's actions
Posted on 7/19/22 at 6:42 am
Posted on 7/19/22 at 6:42 am
CNN putting in work to make sure their lemmings continue to believe it's not actually that big of a deal that this kid was there to stop the shooting. They're as bad as Everytown.
CNN article
Do we think that it might have something to do with active shooters choosing targets that are "gun free zones?"
I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption to say the outcome here would have been worse if only one person had been armed.
CNN article
quote:
It's rare to have an armed bystander attack an active shooter, according to data from the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training (ALERRT) at Texas State University.
There were at least 434 active shooter attacks in the US from 2000 to 2021, according to the ALERRT data. Active shooter attacks were defined as those in which one or more shooters killed or attempted to kill multiple unrelated people in a populated place.
Of those 434 active shooter cases, an armed bystander shot the attacker in 22 of the incidents. In 10 of those, the "good guy" was a security guard or an off-duty police officer, the ALERRT data said.
Do we think that it might have something to do with active shooters choosing targets that are "gun free zones?"
quote:
And having more than one armed person at the scene who is not a member of law enforcement can create confusion and carry dire risks, according to a data analysis published by The New York Times. For example, an armed bystander who shot and killed an attacker in 2021 in Arvada, Colorado, was himself shot and killed by the police who mistook him for the gunman, the Times reported.
I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption to say the outcome here would have been worse if only one person had been armed.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 6:44 am to DisplacedBuckeye
This does work :)
Posted on 7/19/22 at 6:45 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
It's rare to have an armed bystander attack an active shooter,
Seems like it’s also becoming rare for cops to attack an active shooter as well until they have 400 on scene to deal with it.
When seconds count, police are only minutes away. Thanks but I’ll keep carrying for my and my family’s protection.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 6:45 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do we think that it might have something to do with active shooters choosing targets that are "gun free zones?"
And that the media treats guns as if they are racist aliens made out of plutonium.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:33 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Even if you take the CNN article at face value, 22 out of 434 is still pretty great.
What happened to “if it saves just one life” that is always at the center of the lefts emotional arguments?
What happened to “if it saves just one life” that is always at the center of the lefts emotional arguments?
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:57 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Meh.
The kid did good and deserves credit for his actions, but the additional data is interesting, and I see no reason to NOT report it.
Should the media provide more info in OTHER shootings, too. Yeah.
EDIT
cool flowchart.
The kid did good and deserves credit for his actions, but the additional data is interesting, and I see no reason to NOT report it.
Should the media provide more info in OTHER shootings, too. Yeah.
EDIT
cool flowchart.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 8:46 am
Posted on 7/19/22 at 8:19 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
It's rare to have an armed bystander attack an active shooter
Just they're wording makes the hero sound bad.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 8:20 am to DisplacedBuckeye
How many of those 434 active shooter attacks were in gun free zones? That seems to be the most relevant variable here.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 3:09 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Figures don't lie, but liars figure.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 3:36 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
There were at least 434 active shooter attacks in the US from 2000 to 2021
WTF is this?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News