- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

White House orders release of Pence records to Jan. 6 comm
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:48 pm
The Biden administration has ordered the National Archives to turn over records from former Vice President Mike Pence despite objections from former President Trump.
A Tuesday letter from White House Counsel Dana Remus directed the agency to begin releasing the documents to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
“Many of the records as to which the former President has made a claim of privilege in this set of documents, however, were communications concerning the former Vice President’s responsibilities as President of the Senate in certifying the vote of presidential electors on January 6, 2021,” Remus wrote.
ADVERTISEMENT
Although vice presidential records do qualify for some public record exemption that restrict access, “they are not subject to claims of the presidential communications privilege,” she wrote.
Remus has consistently ordered the release of various Trump-era documents, noting that President Biden, as the sitting commander in chief, has not asserted any privilege over the records.
LINK
A Tuesday letter from White House Counsel Dana Remus directed the agency to begin releasing the documents to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
“Many of the records as to which the former President has made a claim of privilege in this set of documents, however, were communications concerning the former Vice President’s responsibilities as President of the Senate in certifying the vote of presidential electors on January 6, 2021,” Remus wrote.
ADVERTISEMENT
Although vice presidential records do qualify for some public record exemption that restrict access, “they are not subject to claims of the presidential communications privilege,” she wrote.
Remus has consistently ordered the release of various Trump-era documents, noting that President Biden, as the sitting commander in chief, has not asserted any privilege over the records.
LINK
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:52 pm to Jbird
Let’s just go ahead and release allllll records and surveillance regarding Jan 6th.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:53 pm to Blitzed
quote:Naw man these hacks would never do that.
Let’s just go ahead and release allllll records and surveillance regarding Jan 6th.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:53 pm to Jbird
Would there be anything of value in there you think?
I haven't followed this fraud committee all that much
I haven't followed this fraud committee all that much
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:54 pm to idlewatcher
quote:I am sure Decatur's buddy will selectively leak some "bomb" to the press.
Would there be anything of value in there you think?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:55 pm to Blitzed
quote:
Let’s just go ahead and release allllll records and surveillance regarding Jan 6th.
That's a good point. Trump is acting very guilty by starting up lawsuits to block access to records. We should encourage transparency and denigrate officials like Trump who continually attempt to block access to records.
Couldn't agree with you more.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:57 pm to RoughDraft
quote:
We should encourage transparency
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:03 pm to RoughDraft
RoughDraft
Member since Apr 2018
22 posts
What an interesting, and not at all suspicious, account. Started in 2018, and is here now active on the PoliBoard, but somehow did not post at all during multiple elections and only started posting a week or so ago.
I'm eager to see the next alter, FinalDraft.
Member since Apr 2018
22 posts
What an interesting, and not at all suspicious, account. Started in 2018, and is here now active on the PoliBoard, but somehow did not post at all during multiple elections and only started posting a week or so ago.
I'm eager to see the next alter, FinalDraft.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:04 pm to GeauxTigerTM
Draft is a long time lurker don't ya know! 
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:05 pm to RoughDraft
quote:
That's a good point. Trump is acting very guilty by starting up lawsuits to block access to records. We should encourage transparency and denigrate officials like Trump who continually attempt to block access to records. Couldn't agree with you more.
So defending his right to executive privilege is an example of guilt?
So by your line of reasoning, lawyering up is a sign of guilt.
Ok, Fed.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:06 pm to Jbird
quote:
Your heroes on that committee are mighty selective with there leaks.
1. Never called them my heroes. But it's very likely that you don't mind being dishonest, so more power to you I suppose.
2. All leaks are selective by definition essentially, no? Do you not think that republican led committees in the past or Trumps close advisors also selected their leaks carefully? I'm not saying I approve, but to say leaks are selective isn't exactly breaking new ground or something that can be used against one side more than the other.
Now for the good question. Do you support transparency? Or do you only support it when it favors you politically?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:08 pm to RoughDraft
How many GOP committees refused to seat the Dim leaders’ choices for membership and chose for them instead?
That right there kills any credibility the J6 committee pretended to have.
That right there kills any credibility the J6 committee pretended to have.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:08 pm to Jbird
Why pick and choose? Just release all records of everyone there that day. Be they the rioters or politicians. I would like to see Pelosi and aoc's records for that day.
Instead, we just get uniparty partisans jacking each other off as they explicitly target political opponents. Even some of the instigators of the riot itself are given a free pass, because it's clear they're a fed informant.
Instead, we just get uniparty partisans jacking each other off as they explicitly target political opponents. Even some of the instigators of the riot itself are given a free pass, because it's clear they're a fed informant.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:09 pm to RoughDraft
quote:
1. Never called them my heroes. But it's very likely that you don't mind being dishonest, so more power to you I suppose.
quote:Sure thing Alter Schiff.
All leaks are selective by definition essentially, no
quote:Like I said alter douche release it fricking all, including all the video.
Now for the good question. Do you support transparency? Or do you only support it when it favors you politically?
Schiff and company will never do that, this is why it's another witch hunt with predictable alters like you suddenly appearing on the scene.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:09 pm to fjlee90
quote:
So defending his right to executive privilege is an example of guilt?
He no longer has a right to executive privilege, and has tried to claim executive privilege on discussions that have never been covered by the concept at all. Advice and discussions with official advisors can be claimed. Discussions with random civilians like Steve Bannon or Roger Stone by definition isn't covered and the courts have confirmed this.
Does the truth matter to you? Even a little bit?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:11 pm to RoughDraft
quote:
He no longer has a right to executive privilege
quote:
Does the truth matter to you? Even a little bit?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:12 pm to Blitzed
quote:
allllll records and surveillance regarding Jan 6th.
All the security video and all of Nancy's communications would be good.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:13 pm to Jbird
So they’ve made it down to the VP, does that mean they’ll be releasing Madame Speaker’s next?
Back to top

17











