- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Scream 5 | Final Trailer
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:14 pm
I get the feeling that at least one of the three original protagonists don't make it out alive. My money is on Dewey but I could also see Sidney getting the ax as well.
YouTube
YouTube
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:21 pm to RollTide1987
Stu has to be alive....
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:30 pm to LSUMaverick
quote:how?
Stu has to be alive....
If his body was missing and he was just MIA after the whole situation in the 1st film, seems when the 2nd or 3rd film came around it would have been mentioned.
And, if I tell the police my story..and they are like "well, stu is gone..", there would have been a manhunt and all hospitals would have been on alert for a guy with severe blood loss from knife wounds and head trauma. Giving he could make the trek anyways.
Doesn't make any sense for him to be alive, but I fully expect it from such a shitty franchise.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:36 pm to RollTide1987
Sidney is scream because shock value but it'll be dumb
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:12 pm to RollTide1987
Courtney Cox has a horrific monster face now, yeesh.
I love me some Jack Quaid though.
I love me some Jack Quaid though.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:14 pm to RollTide1987
wonder how it will fare releasing straight to theaters vs stream?
ETA: or did I misunderstand the "only in theaters" part? I will def be trying to watch it.
ETA: or did I misunderstand the "only in theaters" part? I will def be trying to watch it.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:17 pm to LSUMaverick
quote:
Stu has to be alive....
Thats been the rumor, but would be pretty outlandish his name hasn't come up in any of the others if the body was missing.
Unless this one basically ignores the other 3 even exist.
Its got to be someone from the original because Arquet says "the killer is a part of the past"
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:20 pm to Lsut81
Lillard has been pushing to return for years. He keeps saying no way Stu died because of the TV.
As for how he could escape without anyone knowing..that's the biggest hurtle to overcome. They would have to do something like we thought he was dead, but he wasn't so we stashed him away in a mental hospital and didn't tell anyone due to the trauma it would cause.
As for how he could escape without anyone knowing..that's the biggest hurtle to overcome. They would have to do something like we thought he was dead, but he wasn't so we stashed him away in a mental hospital and didn't tell anyone due to the trauma it would cause.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:27 pm to Vood
quote:
we thought he was dead, but he wasn't so we stashed him away in a mental hospital and didn't tell anyone due to the trauma it would cause.
Plausible...
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:29 pm to Lsut81
My 12 year old is begging me to take her to see this.
Don’t judge
Don’t judge
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:34 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Don’t judge
Who would judge? The first Scream was awesome, definitely a staple of my teenage years.
I don't do movie theaters anymore, but will check this out when goes to streaming service.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:47 pm to Vood
quote:
Stu
Supposedly Wes Craven had planned for Stu to be manipulating the killer(s) from his prison cell in Scream 3, but changed it at the last minute because of the Columbine shootings. No idea how true that is and I’m not sure it even makes sense.
The working theories are:
- the killer is Billy’s long lost sibling
- the killer is Billy and Sidney’s love child who she gave up for adoption before heading off to college
- the killer is Stu who has been either in jail or in a nuthouse unbeknownst to everyone for the past 25 years
All 3 feel flimsy and lame.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 3:20 pm to Boring
The early reviews are really good. Can't wait to see it.
The killer seems like a relative of somebody involved in the original.
Stu would be over the top however. Maybe he had a younger brother/sister?
The killer seems like a relative of somebody involved in the original.
Stu would be over the top however. Maybe he had a younger brother/sister?
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 3:25 pm to m57
i recently saw the original, but i don't remember any siblings being around. except for jamie kennedy's sister with the VHS tape in 3.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 3:36 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
but i don't remember any siblings being around. except for jamie kennedy's sister with the VHS tape in 3.
Assuming the killer is one of the high schoolers, they would have been born long after the events of the original film.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 3:49 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Assuming the killer is one of the high schoolers, they would have been born long after the events of the original film.
They did the long lost cousin act in 4. It may be just a random killer from the hs group. There are usually two killers, and what is the deal with the gold mask? Is that two different ones, I wonder.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 3:57 pm to SEClint
quote:
Stu has to be alive....
how?
The “Stu is alive” crowd want to magic away the TV electrocution bit but also conveniently forget that Billy got in a few extra (very deep) stabs on Stu when they were stabbing each other. Stu was feeling woozy and was obviously losing blood at an incredibly lethal rate.
Now, this doesn’t preclude the writers of Scream 5 doing “Stu is alive” anyway, no matter how stupid it is. But the fact remains, it would be stupid.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 4:05 pm to Boring
quote:
the killer is Billy and Sidney’s love child who she gave up for adoption before heading off to college
Sidney would have to be the most Pro Lifiest person in the world to carry that pregnancy to term.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 7:57 pm to SEClint
quote:technically, they have an out if they really wanted to.
If his body was missing and he was just MIA after the whole situation in the 1st film, seems when the 2nd or 3rd film came around it would have been mentioned
Matthew Lillard is at the fraternity party (uncredited role) in Scream 2 talking to Timothy Olyphant's character
Posted on 1/11/22 at 8:18 pm to DJ3K
quote:
technically, they have an out if they really wanted to. Matthew Lillard is at the fraternity party (uncredited role) in Scream 2 talking to Timothy Olyphant's character
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News