Started By
Message

Three more studies show negative vaccine efficacy.

Posted on 1/7/22 at 9:38 pm
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
6137 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 9:38 pm
quote:

When will health authorities face up to what the data is telling us?

The last two weeks have brought three new studies finding negative efficacy for two vaccine doses, meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated.
Aletho News

Have the experimental gene therapy injections compromised people’s immune systems? If so, might this be a life long side effect?
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71597 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 9:41 pm to
Supposedly if USSC rules feb 8th you’d need at least 2 shots. Insanity
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111608 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

If so, might this be a life long side effect?


There’s no reason to bring that into this discussion.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11278 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Pfizer vaccine effectiveness at 53.8% and Moderna at 65% against Delta after three months. They reported that a third dose of Pfizer got vaccine effectiveness against Omicron back up to 54.6%, at least for a month.


And just like that - up to date means quarterly.

For now, until years of science tells us otherwise.

quote:

With Omicron, the reports of negative efficacy are becoming impossible to ignore
Posted by tigergirl10
Member since Jul 2019
10323 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 9:58 pm to
Why are the majority of people in ICU’s with covid the unvaccinated? At least 80%.
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
22177 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:17 pm to
Dr Robert Malone…… he knows
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17059 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

When will health authorities face up to what the data is telling us?


Because the data is not saying what that blogger is claiming. As I learned long ago, always go to the source and don't listen to people's "interpretation." So I read the study. Lo and behold, the paper itself addresses the "negative" vaccine efficacy:

quote:

The negative estimates in the final period arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.


The authors conclude the negative efficacy is an artifact and an "underestimation of vaccine efficacy" (their words).

Below they make mention of a British study which corroborates their study. The British study found that boosting brought the VE back up to about 75%:

quote:

A recent study from England (in preprint) found higher effectiveness against symptomatic Omicron initially after BNT162b2 vaccination followed by a rapid decline in protection, and that VE increased to 75.5% (56.1 to 86.3%) two weeks after booster vaccination using unvaccinated individuals as comparison.



They conclude:

quote:

Our study contributes to emerging evidence that BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 primary vaccine protection against Omicron decreases quickly over time with booster vaccination offering a significant increase in protection. In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.



There you have it from the horse's mouth. The authors of the study the skeptics cite are not saying what the skeptics claim they're saying. The study authors themselves are saying more people need to get vaxxed and boosted.

(By the way, I am not arguing for or against the boost. I am just pointing out that you should not listen to bloggers without checking the primary source yourself).
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 1/7/22 at 11:33 pm to



If the vaccine is effective for about 10 weeks like they say, then totally ineffective this is exactly what you would expect to see.

A balancing of the infection risk.

The vaccine doesn’t work. No one has a damaged immune system. Stop wishcasting harm on the vaccinated. They aren’t your enemy. The enemy are the politicians and pharma trying to force this on everyone.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram