Started By
Message
locked post

Abbott screws up big time, by signing SB 5

Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:33 pm
Posted by BillRose
Texas
Member since Jun 2021
989 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:33 pm
LINK


S.B. No. 5




AN ACT
relating to the unlawful restraint of a dog; creating a criminal
offense.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 821, Health and Safety Code, is amended
by adding Subchapter E to read as follows:
SUBCHAPTER E. UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT OF DOG
Sec. 821.101. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:
(1) "Adequate shelter" means a sturdy structure:
(A) that provides the dog protection from
inclement weather; and
(B) with dimensions that allow the dog while in
the shelter to stand erect, sit, turn around, and lie down in a
normal position.
(2) "Collar" means a band of material specifically
designed to be placed around the neck of a dog.
(3) "Harness" means a set of straps constructed of
nylon, leather, or similar material, specifically designed to
restrain or control a dog.
(4) "Inclement weather" includes rain, hail, sleet,
snow, high winds, extreme low temperatures, or extreme high
temperatures.
(5) "Owner" means a person who owns or has custody or
control of a dog.
(6) "Properly fitted" means, with respect to a collar
or harness, a collar or harness that:
(A) is appropriately sized for the dog based on
the dog's measurements and body weight;
(B) does not choke the dog or impede the dog's
normal breathing or swallowing; and
(C) does not cause pain or injury to the dog.
(7) "Restraint" means a chain, rope, tether, leash,
cable, or other device that attaches a dog to a stationary object or
trolley system.
Sec. 821.102. UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT OF DOG; OFFENSE. (a) An
owner may not leave a dog outside and unattended by use of a
restraint unless the owner provides the dog access to:
(1) adequate shelter;
(2) an area that allows the dog to avoid standing water
and exposure to excessive animal waste;
(3) shade from direct sunlight; and
(4) potable water.
(b) An owner may not restrain a dog outside and unattended
by use of a restraint that:
(1) is a chain;
(2) has weights attached;
(3) is shorter in length than the greater of:
(A) five times the length of the dog, as measured
from the tip of the dog's nose to the base of the dog's tail; or
(B) 10 feet; or
(4) is attached to a collar or harness not properly
fitted.
(c) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly
violates this section. The restraint of each dog that is in
violation is a separate offense.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor,
except that the offense is a Class B misdemeanor if the person has
previously been convicted under this section.
(e) If conduct constituting an offense under this section
also constitutes an offense under any other law, the actor may be
prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.
Sec. 821.103. EXCEPTIONS. (a) Section 821.102 does not
apply to:
(1) the use of a restraint on a dog in a public camping
or recreational area in compliance with the requirements of the
public camping or recreational area as defined by a federal, state,
or local authority or jurisdiction;
(2) the use of a restraint on a dog while the owner and
dog engage in, or actively train for, an activity conducted under a
valid license issued by this state provided the activity is
associated with the use or presence of a dog;
(3) the use of a restraint on a dog while the owner and
dog engage in conduct directly related to the business of
shepherding or herding cattle or livestock;
(4) the use of a restraint on a dog while the owner and
dog engage in conduct directly related to the business of
cultivating agricultural products;
(5) a dog left unattended in an open-air truck bed only
for the time reasonably necessary for the owner to complete a
temporary task that requires the dog to be left unattended in the
truck bed;
(6) a dog taken by the owner, or another person with
the owner's permission, from the owner's residence or property and
restrained by the owner or the person for not longer than the time
necessary for the owner to engage in an activity that requires the
dog to be temporarily restrained; or
(7) a dog restrained while the owner and dog are
engaged in, or actively training for, hunting or field trialing.
(b) Section 821.102(b)(3) does not apply to a restraint
attached to a trolley system that allows a dog to move along a
running line for a distance equal to or greater than the lengths
specified under that subdivision.
(c) This subchapter does not prohibit a person from walking
a dog with a handheld leash.
Sec. 821.104. EFFECT OF SUBCHAPTER ON OTHER LAW. This
subchapter does not preempt a local regulation relating to the
restraint of a dog or affect the authority of a political
subdivision to adopt or enforce an ordinance or requirement
relating to the restraint of a dog if the regulation, ordinance, or
requirement:
(1) is compatible with and equal to or more stringent
than a requirement prescribed by this subchapter; or
(2) relates to an issue not specifically addressed by
this subchapter.
SECTION 2. Subchapter D, Chapter 821, Health and Safety
Code, is repealed.
SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only
to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.
An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is
governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,
and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For
purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the
effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred
before that date.
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect on the 91st day after the
last day of the legislative session.



If your ability to read and comprehend is limited;


(b) An owner may not restrain a dog outside and unattended
by use of a restraint that:
(1) is a chain;

This post was edited on 12/26/21 at 3:08 pm
Posted by roguetiger15
Member since Jan 2013
17352 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:35 pm to
Ain’t nobody reading that shite
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31823 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

b) An owner may not restrain a dog outside and unattended by use of a restraint that: (1) is a chain; (2) has weights attached; (3) is shorter in length than the greater of: (A) five times the length of the dog, as measured from the tip of the dog's nose to the base of the dog's tail; or (B) 10 feet; or


I’m not going to act like I like any new laws that make the citizenry do anything, but laws against chaining dogs to trees are not very high on my Abbot hate-a-meter.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
28006 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:39 pm to
Sorry you have to keep your pit bull inside.
Posted by BillRose
Texas
Member since Jun 2021
989 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:45 pm to
Agreed but you miss the point. Chain of any kind is now illegal to use as a way to tie your dog. Rope can't be used to tie an unattended dog and the plastic covered braided wire twists and breaks easily. This means dogs will get loose either being injured or causing mayhem.


(b) An owner may not restrain a dog outside and unattended
by use of a restraint that:
(1) is a chain;



quote:


I’m not going to act like I like any new laws that make the citizenry do anything, but laws against chaining dogs to trees are not very high on my Abbot hate-a-meter.


This post was edited on 12/26/21 at 3:28 pm
Posted by BillRose
Texas
Member since Jun 2021
989 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Sorry you have to keep your pit bull inside.


I don't own any Pit Bulls airhead. Are you a Biden voter?
Posted by BillRose
Texas
Member since Jun 2021
989 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Ain’t nobody reading that shite


Typical dumbass remark.
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:24 pm to
Why do you have an issue with this?
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
14426 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:29 pm to
Pissed off that you can't keep your dog in shitty conditions?
Life is hard.
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5844 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:31 pm to
You can still leash your dog outside if that’s something that you need to do to patronize a business
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27004 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Sorry you have to keep your pit bull inside.


Posted by steadytiger
Member since Jan 2007
2756 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:39 pm to
Typical dumbass remark.
Said in humor. And it is funny!
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
22049 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:39 pm to
Explain how Abbot screwed up Big Time.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28158 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Chain of any kid is now illegal


Of course.

Common sense.
Posted by Flashback
reading the chicken bones
Member since Apr 2008
8479 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:44 pm to
People who chain dogs are trashy low lifes.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
44890 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:45 pm to
Take care of your damn dog and don’t chain it outside like an a-hole so everyone else has to hear it bark all day/night.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23882 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 2:54 pm to
If you’re going to “house” your dog outside get a damn kennel.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466846 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Rope can't be used to tie an unattended dog

Why not (assuming the other factors are met)?

I see chain was banned, but not rope.
Posted by BillRose
Texas
Member since Jun 2021
989 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Why do you have an issue with this?


I like every part of this law other than it makes using chain as a tether illegal. There is no better material for a dog restraint. Period. If you don't know this than you know nothing of owning dogs.
This post was edited on 12/26/21 at 8:10 pm
Posted by BillRose
Texas
Member since Jun 2021
989 posts
Posted on 12/26/21 at 3:04 pm to
quote:


Why not (assuming the other factors are met)?

I see chain was banned, but not rope.


Dogs easily chew through rope. It is very inferior to chain and would lead to more lost, injured and impounded dogs plus bitten people and other dogs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram