Started By
Message

re: My company just withdrew the vaccine requirement

Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:25 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
114068 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Essentially no one is liable for vaccine injuries in this country.


This isn’t true. And it’s important to understand this.

Vaccine makers are only free from liability when their vaccine is approved, safe and recommended for pediatric and pregnant recipients.

Because this isn’t true for the Covid vaccines, the Covid vaccines are not free from liability because they are vaccines. They are free from liability because they have an Emergency Use Authorization. And this is why Comirnaty is not available for distribution in the United States. If someone got a Comirnaty vaccine and had an Adverse event, they could absolutely sue Pfizer.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15916 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Imagine being an attorney in all of this right now.


I am one. There’s no easy answer to this question for employees. I’ve advised a few.

There’s also no easy way for attys to get paid on this. That was gone with the liability waivers on vaccine companies.

Not that anyone feels sorry for lawyers, I get it. But damn I’ve had to give some answers that I don’t like. I feel for my clients. This is an unbelievably shitty situation for everyone except the US GVT and Pfizer
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11617 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Imagine being a CEO and following HR's demands from the executive branch with no authority to implement a mandate.

Civics is dead in this country.
A whole lot of "woke" companies followed their Dem masters, and seemed forget about the Constitution and the judicial system. Looks like a bunch of fired workers (and lawyers) are gonna get paid.

You have to be some kind of special dumbass, especially in a red state, to go lock, stock, and barrel on just the musings of the administration led by a demented, perverted, old man.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
56552 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:28 am to
I said a few months ago when a lot of people were making fun of GumboPot over this that I will revisit it if Comirnaty is not available by the end of the year. Where do we stand on that?
Posted by GoIrish02
Member since Mar 2012
1396 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:30 am to
No, unlike the blanket immunity enjoyed by the vaccine manufacturers, an employee injury resulting from an employer mandate is compensable by workers compensation.

This is why employers have hesitated, any employees who have an adverse reaction will have all medical costs paid by their employer, plus wage replacement per state workers compensation scales. An adverse reaction could be death or other major medical problems but also 'emotional distress' that some can use to work from home and/or get a paid vacation (or another remote job).
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
114068 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:30 am to
It is not available and will not be available.

My outline above lays out the issue very plainly. It will never be available until the pediatric indication is in place for the Pfizer vaccine.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11478 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:30 am to
quote:

I wonder what the liability is for the company should an employee forced to take the "vaccine" suffer a major adverse effect.


I think it will be hard to prove it was the vaccine that caused it, due to all the misinformation or lack of information surrounding it.
Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
4977 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:31 am to
quote:

ou have to be some kind of special dumbass, especially in a red state, to go lock, stock, and barrel on just the musings of the administration led by a demented, perverted, old man.


Well said!
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29917 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:38 am to
quote:

an employee injury resulting from an employer mandate is compensable by workers compensation.

Good point--so there is some avenue to get medical costs paid, etc.

However employers are not going to be found liable in a civil suit for damages from the vaccine mandates. It will have to be done through their workers compensation insurance like any other workplace injury/illness. Employers' costs for maintaining the policy will likely increase, but they won't be on the hook for the medical expenses. That will come from the WC policy.
This post was edited on 12/8/21 at 10:41 am
Posted by GoIrish02
Member since Mar 2012
1396 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:39 am to
It's pretty clear if one is a healthy, young employee before the vaccine and then you're dead, deaf or have cardiovascular problems all of a sudden after you receive the experimental, employer-mandated vaccine.

All those professional and college athletes (Euro soccer players, NBA players, Deion Sanders, U of Minnesota RB) aren't dropping dead or being hospitalized randomly, it's right after they get the vaccine. If pro athletes are being affected, cubicle workers aren't escaping the pretty clear major side effects.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
114068 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:41 am to
quote:

However employers are not going to be found liable in a civil suit for damages from the vaccine mandates. It will have to be done through their workers compensation insurance like any other workplace injury/illness.


Bad news. They changed worker’s compensation this year so that Covid vaccines aren’t the employer’s responsibility.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27590 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:43 am to
Mine is just now enforcing it. I have until Feb 15th.
Posted by GoIrish02
Member since Mar 2012
1396 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:45 am to
Edit: most employers over 100 employees pay their workers compensation claims directly plus a markup on actual claims costs for the insurer to adjust them. Insurance companies don't have a magic bucket of money to pay claims, that money comes from the employer ultimately.

Agreed, but those are major costs that are paid by the employer either way. Most major employers have been handling Covid infections under their health insurance mechanism, adding in having to pay 2/3 of your employees' average weekly wages while they're out (temporarily or permanently) would be a catastrophic new cost to most businesses.

And any company that mandates can certainly be sued by the employee's family members in tort for damages beyond workers compensation.
This post was edited on 12/8/21 at 10:51 am
Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
11384 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:45 am to
Our company asked us to identify in September/October for customers who are mandating it. I had put ‘Refuse to Answer’, so will probably be fired before anyone who put ‘No’.

There’s been nothing since, and I get the feeling a lot of people hit ‘No’ or ‘Refuse to Answer’
Posted by Bunta
Member since Oct 2007
12346 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:46 am to
My company was moving forward with it but is now holding off until the courts sort it out. They’re still requiring employees to report their vaccination status, though.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
81460 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Employees who do not respond will be registered as not vaccinated.


What I would do if was requested to declare.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
81460 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Bad news. They changed worker’s compensation this year so that Covid vaccines aren’t the employer’s responsibility.


Where?

thought there was legislation in certain states saying that those termed would qualify for unemployment?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29917 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:49 am to
quote:

They changed worker’s compensation this year so that Covid vaccines aren’t the employer’s responsibility.


This would be state-dependent, no?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
59501 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:49 am to
I just got an email from my company saying they are suspending all mandates and or testing requirements in leu of the recent court stays.
Posted by Mac Power
Member since Jul 2019
449 posts
Posted on 12/8/21 at 10:57 am to
quote:

They are free from liability because they have an Emergency Use Authorization.


This sums up my take on it as well. People still took it voluntarily. You can argue you were coerced, but I don't think that will fly.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram