- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Judge THROWS OUT Kari Lake Lawsuit
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:35 am
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:35 am
Yes, we have other threads about the substance of the ruling. This is a bit different.
I keep seeing this exact language in headlines. The lawsuit was not “thrown out.“ It was adjudicated after an expedited trial on the merits.
Why is the media choosing this inflammatory language? Who benefits? Is it just to create chaos?
I keep seeing this exact language in headlines. The lawsuit was not “thrown out.“ It was adjudicated after an expedited trial on the merits.
Why is the media choosing this inflammatory language? Who benefits? Is it just to create chaos?
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:36 am to AggieHank86
Why is the media choosing this inflammatory language?
You know why
You know why
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:37 am to AggieHank86
Because they can, and they do it so well.
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:37 am to AggieHank86
You know why. It’s to shape opinion on any future suit
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:37 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Who benefits?
Jjdoc, editor in chief of Gateway Pundit and several other Facebook news organizations.
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:38 am to AggieHank86
Same reason it was done on Christmas Eve.
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I keep seeing this exact language in headlines. The lawsuit was not “thrown out.“
The term thrown out is used to make it look frivolous and for them to look crazy therefore painting MAGA as crazy.
MAGA represents freedom and they can't have that.
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why is the media choosing this inflammatory language? You know why
So the media lacks credibility in your view? Why then do you shamelessly parrot their talking points?
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I really don’t.
You know why
The consensus here is that the media and the judiciary are lockstep with the Left.
If that is true, and for purposes of this forum we must assume that to be the case, what is the benefit in the Left-aligned media creating an impression that a Far-Right politician was treated unfairly by the Left-aligned judiciary?
Seems counter-intuitive.
This post was edited on 12/25/22 at 10:44 am
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:41 am to AggieHank86
Because it sounds way more dramatic and will drive more clicks
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:42 am to Indefatigable
we both can be here
it's the fact that he's making a thread to try and pick a fight with others.
ETA: all the usual suspects in here

ETA: all the usual suspects in here

This post was edited on 12/25/22 at 10:43 am
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:43 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:I guess that makes a bit of sense.
The term “thrown out” is used to make it (the Lake lawsuit?) look frivolous
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:The frick is wrong with you?
Why is the media choosing this inflammatory language? Who benefits? Is it just to create chaos?
You know why.
Why can’t you help but flame people here?
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:Why do you think the language used creates this impression?
what is the benefit in the Left-aligned media creating an impression that a Far-Right politician was treated unfairly by the Left-aligned judiciary?
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:49 am to oklahogjr
quote:THAT makes a LOT of sense.
”Thrown out” sounds way more dramatic and will drive more clicks
This post was edited on 12/25/22 at 10:50 am
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:51 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:In my mind, the term “thrown out“ includes an implication that there was not a full adjudication on the merits.
Why do you think the language used creates this impression?
Maybe that’s just a lawyerly perspective, and I read too much into it.
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:51 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Yes, we have other threads about the substance of the ruling. This is a bit different.
No, it’s really not, you just wanted to rub noses in it.
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:52 am to Bulldogblitz
quote:Well, there ARE a lot of men in this thread acting like women.
The drag show doesn't start for him until 3.
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:53 am to AggieHank86
quote:
If that is true, and for purposes of this forum we must assume that to be the case, what is the benefit in the Left-aligned media creating an impression that a Far-Right politician was treated unfairly by the Left-aligned judiciary?
Is this your interpretation?
It sounded to me like they were trying to cover for the election “oddities” by making the lawsuit look frivolous.
Nonetheless...frick the goose-steppers.
Merry Christmas Hank.
This post was edited on 12/25/22 at 10:54 am
Posted on 12/25/22 at 10:53 am to BigMob
quote:Nah. Mickey and Boosie took care of that quite adequately.
you just wanted to rub noses in it.
Popular
Back to top
