Started By
Message

Disney absolutely got wrecked by Charter Communications

Posted on 9/12/23 at 4:40 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 4:40 am
15 million homes in the United States have been granted the ad-based tier of Disney+ at no additional cost as part of their basic Spectrum package. And those who pay for the more expensive Spectrum TV Plus package will also get ESPN+ at no additional cost. Disney initially refused Charter's demands when it came to these two services but caved completely.

This sets a precedent that larger media companies such as NBC Comcast will exploit when their present contracts with Disney expire. If Charter was able to get this sweet sweet deal from Disney, you know Comcast will be able to get a better one.

YouTube analysis
This post was edited on 9/12/23 at 4:45 am
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
36129 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 4:43 am to
“I ain’t watching no 9 minute 30 second video…“



Duck Fisney

Posted by MSTiger33
Member since Oct 2007
21007 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 5:34 am to
When does that deal start?
Posted by Philzilla
Member since Nov 2011
2118 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 5:37 am to
quote:

will also get ESPN+

Somebody can have mine.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68334 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:01 am to
quote:

15 million homes in the United States have been granted the ad-based tier of Disney+


Now Disney can fudge the numbers and pretend like there’s more subscribers.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451960 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:21 am to
So real cable is coming back
Posted by Crisprdestroyer
Member since Sep 2017
693 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:46 am to
Charter is paying a wholesale cost for the products. You’re not getting it for free. Plus Disney is offering 1.99 ad free for three months to everybody. So 2 dollars basically breaks Disney even and it’s gravy for them every month you forget to delete the subscription.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6148 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Now Disney can fudge the numbers and pretend like there’s more subscribers.


Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Charter is paying a wholesale cost for the products. You’re not getting it for free. Plus Disney is offering 1.99 ad free for three months to everybody. So 2 dollars basically breaks Disney even and it’s gravy for them every month you forget to delete the subscription.


Disney did not want to do this, however. This is what Spectrum wanted and this is what Spectrum got. They didn't mind paying the wholesale cost of the streaming service. The whole point of this was to strike a blow against the streaming model by including streaming services such as Disney+ and ESPN+ in their cable packages.
This post was edited on 9/12/23 at 8:27 am
Posted by LeClerc
USVI
Member since Oct 2012
2841 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Disney did not want to do this, however. This is what Spectrum wanted and this is what Spectrum got. They didn't mind paying the wholesale cost of the streaming service. The whole point of this was to strike a blow against the streaming model by including streaming services such as Disney+ and ESPN+ in their cable packages.

How do you know any of this?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 9:05 am to
quote:

How do you know any of this?



I can read? It's the whole reason why Disney took ESPN and ABC off of Charter. They couldn't come to an agreement on this issue. So Charter just decided to wait Disney out.
Posted by LeClerc
USVI
Member since Oct 2012
2841 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 9:08 am to
Read what?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 10:23 am to
This?

quote:

The inclusion of Disney's ad-supported streaming apps for Charter's customers had appeared to be a sticking point in the negotiations that stalled and led to a blackout. While this deal doesn't appear to give all Charter pay TV customers access to all of Disney's apps – which also include Hulu – it is a step in that direction as cord cutting ramps up for pay TV distributors.

The dispute between Charter and Disney had been ongoing since late August when carriage renewal negotiations broke down between the two companies and left millions of customers without Disney TV channels, including ESPN, FX and Disney Channel.


LINK


Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
54902 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 10:31 am to
Charter ran the numbers and determined it could walk away without losing money
Posted by LeClerc
USVI
Member since Oct 2012
2841 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Disney will receive an increase on the subscriber fees it receives from Charter.


Yeah, Disney was absolutely "wrecked."

Your subject line imparts a whiff of glee that Disney was "wrecked" by the deal. When clearly it was not. They got something out of it as well which you left out of your quote (interestingly.)

Disney employs hundreds of thousands of people, pumps billions of dollars into the economies of California and Florida yet you openly root for the company to fail. Is that making America better? Would America be better if Disney failed? Truth is you don't give a shite because all you care about is owning the libs with your anti-woke rage.

Good for you. frick everyone else.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13087 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Now Disney can fudge the numbers and pretend like there’s more subscribers.

It is not fudging when it is true. Smart move by Disney.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
23946 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 12:32 pm to
Didn't Charter also agree to pay Disney more as part of the deal?

Not seeing how Disney got wrecked if the end result is that they're ultimately getting Charter to pay them more. Most people weren't subscribed to ESPN+ anyway, so its probably a net win for Disney to sell subscriptions to that wholesale through Charter packages.
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Disney absolutely got wrecked by Charter Communications


That's not even the worse part. They forced Disney to unbundle their channels and Charter was allowed to drop eight of them. This has never happened before. In the past, Disney has had told cable/satellite companies they ain't getting ESPN unless they take all of their channels. This sets a precedent and other cable/satellite companies will now demand Disney, Warner, etc, unbundle their least watched channels.
This post was edited on 9/12/23 at 2:06 pm
Posted by Stexas
SWLA
Member since May 2013
6585 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 2:14 pm to
I guess I lost out. I had kept Charter/Spectrum until the day after the blackout just for convenience to the ESPN/SEC Network. I was probably the laziest IT guy left paying for cable but it was easier than trying to show my wife how to navigate streaming. Whenever they blacked it out I called to see if they'd credit me or give me some sort of concession but they basically told me to kick bricks so I canceled.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32133 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

This sets a precedent that larger media companies such as NBC Comcast will exploit when their present contracts with Disney expire. If Charter was able to get this sweet sweet deal from Disney, you know Comcast will be able to get a better one.


Maybe not. Charter and Comcast are set up a bit differently.

Comcast owns several channels: NBC, Telemundo, TeleXitos, and Cozi TV, MSNBC, CNBC, USA Network, Syfy, Oxygen, Bravo, and E!. If Comcast plays hardball with ESPN and ESPN pulls their programing, the subscribers of Comcast cable may say "frick it", and end their cable subscription. If/when that happens, those lost customers will no longer be paying for MSNBC, USA, Bravo, etc, etc, like they are now.

Charter is different. They don't own any major channels. They do, however, own broadband internet infrastructure. So they looked at this dispute from a different perspective of leverage. People have been and are continuing to cut the cable. Disney/ABC (ESPN) has been signaling recently they they will likely be going to a subscription based streaming model for all of ESPN in the future. Charter essentially said "screw you ESPN. We don't care if you not being a part of our cable subscription kills our cable business...because we don't really care about our cable business. It's a dying business. But, people still need to get their internet. And they will still get it from us...even if they don't subscribe to our cable package. So we are going to still make money even if those disgruntled customers drop our cable and subscribe to YouTube, Hulu, Sling, etc, etc. And when you (ESPN) eventually go to a full streaming platform we (Charter) will still make money because people are still going to need the internet to stream your programming."

Comcast still needs people to subscribe to their cable packages because they need people to pay for Bravo, CNBC, USA, etc. Thus, they are more hesitant to take action which may induce people to drop their Comcast cable package. Charter didn't have that concern.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram