Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Betting proof the committee is full of shite...

Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
5310 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:54 pm
#3 Texas is 5 pts favored over #2 UW lol.

#1 UM is only 2pts favored over #4 Bama and I would bet my left nut that Bama swings to at least a 3-pt favorite before actual kickoff on Jan. 1st.

So the order of their Top 4 makes no sense if they are saying it's the best 4 teams. Naturally Texas and UDub would need to flip but the committee is too chicken shite for that.

And here's the last straw -- UGA would be betting favorites at time of kickoff over any of those 4 teams especially with a revenge game factor against Bama and a month to rest...UGA would be at least -2.

Bullshite to leave FSU out and create this pageant contest.
Posted by CarolinaGamecock99
Member since Apr 2015
23710 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:54 pm to
FSU would be 10 point dogs to all those teams what your point?
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
13346 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

the order of their Top 4 makes no sense if they are saying it's the best 4 teams.

correct. they are throwing out best 4 as their reason for putting bama in but then not ranking the teams according to who they think is best.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
37829 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:55 pm to
Right, if we are doing best teams take that to its logical conclusion and let Vegas decide the teams instead of the sanctimonious BS
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86673 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:56 pm to
Michigan is favored over Alabama?!

Holy cow that’s wild
Posted by XenScott
Pensacola
Member since Oct 2016
3684 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:56 pm to
FSU would be +7 WITH Travis. What are you saying ?
Posted by bayoucracka
Member since Sep 2015
6897 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

UGA would be at least -2.

This is actually a legit gripe that they should be in.
Posted by sparkinator
Lake Claiborne
Member since Dec 2007
4841 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

correct. they are throwing out best 4 as their reason for putting bama in but then not ranking the teams according to who they think is best.


Not a fan of Bama getting in, but I don’t think they can adjust the top 3 rankings. They have to leave them alone.

That’s what I believe I heard from one in the committee when talking to Reece.
Posted by Starchild
Member since May 2010
13550 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

FSU would be 10 point dogs to all those teams what your point?


You mean like when Washington was a 10 point dog to Oregon? What’s yours?
Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
5310 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

correct. they are throwing out best 4 as their reason for putting bama in but then not ranking the teams according to who they think is best.


Bingo. For the slow Gamecock poster above, see this post as my point, hayseed.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
31284 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Not a fan of Bama getting in, but I don’t think they can adjust the top 3 rankings


Why not? They subjectively bend the rules and cater their "arguments" to benefit certain teams as it is.
Posted by Epaminondas
The Boot
Member since Jul 2020
5522 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 1:02 pm to
If it's the best team without regard to their record, the committee already decided Michigan is the best team.

Why play the playoff games? Hand the trophy to Michigan. It doesn't matter if they lose.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram