- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UF Pres says no action on A&M, satistied with 12 teams
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:23 pm to crimson crazy
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:23 pm to crimson crazy
quote:
Do you really think Slive & Co. didn't see this coming when they agreed to the current contract?
yes
quote:
Expansion tears up the contract.
i need to read the terms of this contract
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
how does splitting up our TV money even more help the conference?
17M / 12 = 1.42M
24M / 14 = 1.71M
30M / 16 = 1.88M
You increase the numerator, that's how.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:24 pm to Roaad
quote:Then you're doing it wrong. What you do is take a sleeping pill at noon on Friday. You'll wake up at midnight. Eat breakfast. Shower and jerk off, and go straight to the stadium to get started. You'll hit your second wind right at kickoff, and you'll have just enough energy to party after the win.
quote:
Day games at TS should be illegal.
That puts the onus on me to start drinking ~6AM.
fricking bullshite. . .but I do what I must.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:24 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:
You increase the numerator, that's how.
is there a guarantee we "increase the numerator"
?
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:25 pm to Books
I'm about 99.999999 percent sure they would. UT may threaten not playing them now but they would.
ETA: If anything the nature of the breakup would spice up the rivalry and add another dimension to it.
ETA: If anything the nature of the breakup would spice up the rivalry and add another dimension to it.
This post was edited on 8/14/11 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:27 pm to KJA
quote:
I sort of buy that to a point but when a team drops a game, and then moreso there second it completely changes the dynamic of their season. I like the no room for error nature of the BCS.
I see your point, but I would much rather see the two best teams playing for the title, as opposed to who was set up or who fell into the right place at the right time. Do you remember when LSU won it all in 07 with two losses? We were one game away from seeing WVU playing for the title, but they blew it against Pitt. Do you really think WVU was better than the 2 loss LSU team?
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
is there a guarantee we "increase the numerator"
?
Guarantee? No. Nothing in life is guaranteed except death. Highly likely? Undoubtedly yes.
Add a new large market and another school, preferably one with a new market or good ratings and I don't see how you wouldn't be able to negotiate more money. There is also the option of a network deal like the Big10 and LHN. Not to mention there is precedent; see: the PAC 12 deal.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:29 pm to KJA
Either way it'd be fun beating those weirdos every year but dealing with their strange undeserved superiority complex would get old. I go back and forth on them joining but lean to not wanting it
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:30 pm to crimson crazy
quote:
Do you really think WVU was better than the 2 loss LSU team?
WV was like the perfect team to frick up LSU that year, fwiw
they were bad the frick arse, and had everything we struggled with
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:30 pm to crimson crazy
This sucks. I want A&M gone and for this to be over. Having to stay in a conference with aggie and listening to their never-ending bitching is hell on Earth. I hope this is just legal posturing.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i need to read the terms of this contract
Well, let me go to my safe and pull it out. I'll fax you a copy.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:31 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:There is no doubt that it is highly likely.
Highly likely? Undoubtedly yes.
The former English teacher in me weeps.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they were bad the frick arse, and had everything we struggled with
They lost to Pitt. They weren't very good.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:32 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:I think it is.
I hope this is just legal posturing.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:32 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:
Add a new large market and another school, preferably one with a new market or good ratings
y'all are overrating this "market" storylines
if the SEC had its own network, that would matter a LOT more
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:32 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
This sucks. I want A&M gone and for this to be over. Having to stay in a conference with aggie and listening to their never-ending bitching is hell on Earth. I hope this is just legal posturing.
This is ironic coming from a dude with a bitch voice.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:33 pm to crimson crazy
quote:
They lost to Pitt. They weren't very good.
yea LSU had no hiccups in 2007, either
their QB and MVP got hurt twice, and they lost twice
This post was edited on 8/14/11 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:33 pm to crimson crazy
Again, I see your point too but I think a playoff makes it LESS likely to see the best team win than the current system. I never really feel like it's fair in pro sports when I see a 83 win 2006 St. Louis Cardinals take the world series or the Giants beating the 18-0 Patriots in the super bowl. The 'right place, right time' scenario is more likely to happen in a single game than over the course of the whole season. West Va wasn't as good of a team as LSU, and given the full course of the season, they proved it.
Posted on 8/14/11 at 3:35 pm to crimson crazy
quote:
They lost to Pitt. They weren't very good.
Not true. Lots of upsets in 07, that was as crazy a season as I can ever remember. WVU was legit that year.
Popular
Back to top



1




