- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/15/11 at 4:51 pm to pioneerbasketball
FSU is a must get.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 5:06 pm to NashvilleTN
quote:
A&M
Arkansas
LSU
Mizzou
Ole Miss
Miss St
Vandy
Hell yeah.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 5:26 pm to NashvilleTN
quote:
WEST
A&M
Arkansas
LSU
Mizzou
Ole Miss
Miss St
Vandy
Yea, I bet LSU would love for that to happen.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 6:01 pm to AU86
I say add A&M and Mizzou/OU to the west. Kick Ole Miss to conference USA and add VT to the east.
Another option would be WV to the east.
Another option would be WV to the east.
This post was edited on 8/15/11 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 8/15/11 at 7:02 pm to BayouBengals03
I think if only Mizzou and A&M add an 8 game conference schedule would need to still be in place and their would be no permanent team on the schedule from the opposite division. This means Kentucky or Vandy would need to move West and Bama and AU both to the East. To me this makes sense because then no annual rivals would be broken up... Who are the real rivals for Vandy or Kentucky?
Posted on 8/15/11 at 7:07 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
So, assuming A&M and Missouri join the West, this must mean that Alabama or Auburn will be pushed to the East, correct?
Personally, I think any conference alignment that doesn't keep the schools from Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama in the same division would suck balls.
The SEC West has great chemistry. It would be a tragedy to break that up.
I'm totally cool with adding A&M to the West but not at all cool with taking any current team from the West and moving them to the East.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 7:20 pm to joechristoppher77
quote:
Who are the real rivals for Vandy or Kentucky?
Kentucky considers Tennessee to be a rival for some unknown reason...
Posted on 8/15/11 at 7:28 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 8/15/11 at 7:32 pm to Muahahaha
quote:
Missouri will eventually be added to the Big Ten along with Texas, Kansas, and either Rutgers, Syracuse, or West Virginia.
Syracuse just got booted out of the AAU, so they're probably a no go. West Virginia has no chance in hell of being in the Big 10.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 7:49 pm to bigjuice56
I think there are several requirements for any divisional setup:
1 - Preserve Alabama's rivalries with Auburn and Tennessee. They won't give them up and they have too much pull for it to go away.
2 - Preserve Tennessee's games with Vandy and Kentucky. Those schools need those games. It would be hard to sell f'n over the little guys.
3 - Most importantly, Bama and Florida must be in different divisions. These are the true power teams -- Florida's been in 10 title games and Bama's been in 7. They must be split up for balance, as they have proven to be the most powerful programs.
1 - Preserve Alabama's rivalries with Auburn and Tennessee. They won't give them up and they have too much pull for it to go away.
2 - Preserve Tennessee's games with Vandy and Kentucky. Those schools need those games. It would be hard to sell f'n over the little guys.
3 - Most importantly, Bama and Florida must be in different divisions. These are the true power teams -- Florida's been in 10 title games and Bama's been in 7. They must be split up for balance, as they have proven to be the most powerful programs.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 8:11 pm to Baloo
I don't think moving UK West and Bama/Auburn East would hurt much outside of losing the Tenn/UK matchup. The Mizzou/UK matchup would be a better fit for their style in the long run.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 8:30 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
So, assuming A&M and Missouri join the West, this must mean that Alabama or Auburn will be pushed to the East, correct?
Yes, of course. That way the West will still have six teams and the East will have eight.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 8:33 pm to bigjuice56
quote:
Syracuse just got booted out of the AAU, so they're probably a no go. West Virginia has no chance in hell of being in the Big 10.
Good point. Additionally, I forgot to also stare that Oklahoma would also go as well.
Posted on 8/15/11 at 9:10 pm to Muahahaha
Am I the only one who has ZERO interest in Missouri joining the SEC?
Im ok with adding ATM if we add somebody legit to go along with them. Mizzou does not fit the bill IMO
Edited to add:
I'd rather not add anybody than a ATM, Mizzou combo.
Im ok with adding ATM if we add somebody legit to go along with them. Mizzou does not fit the bill IMO
Edited to add:
I'd rather not add anybody than a ATM, Mizzou combo.
This post was edited on 8/15/11 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 8/15/11 at 10:31 pm to Muahahaha
quote:
Missouri will eventually be added to the Big Ten
Didn't the B10 pass on a MU invite last year when they took NU?
quote:
Texas A&M will eventually be added to the SEC
Correct.
quote:
along with Georgia Tech, Florida State, and Clemson.
Not so fast--UGA, UF, and USCe will form a bloc against any of these schools, none of which bring new media markets.
GATech should have stayed in the SEC all along.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 6:44 am to TexTgrTed
quote:
Didn't the B10 pass on a MU invite last year when they took NU?
Yes, this time around. I believe it is a matter of time before there will be four super conferences formed. Missouri will more than likely be rejoined with Nebraska.
IMHO
This post was edited on 8/16/11 at 6:45 am
Posted on 8/16/11 at 9:36 am to RhodeIslandRed
quote:
Yes, of course. That way the West will still have six teams and the East will have eight.
Learn to read.
Popular
Back to top


1








