- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Politicians could force Texas to play A&M against its will
Posted on 8/27/11 at 11:02 pm to LSU1860
Posted on 8/27/11 at 11:02 pm to LSU1860
If UT has no desire to play aggy in the future there is no way the legislature can force it. There are too many UT, TT and BU legislators to allow it out of committee.
At least that's what I'm told by Texas co-workers.
At least that's what I'm told by Texas co-workers.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 2:25 am to Touchdowns4LSU
#1) Longhorns should realize that if they end the series they look like weak bitches. Them considering no longer playing us is already making them look like weak bitches. If I were a longhorn I'd be embarrassed that the idea is even being floated.
#2) If legislature already admitted that they can't influence a school's conference affiliation, why would they meddle in a single game? This is some real nonsensical b.s. being spewed.
#2) If legislature already admitted that they can't influence a school's conference affiliation, why would they meddle in a single game? This is some real nonsensical b.s. being spewed.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 6:55 am to Dr Drunkenstein
JMO (and perhaps a contrarian one)
Texas is teh one who should be more interested in continuing to play the A&M series - they will probably continue to largely dominate the heads up matchup and that will make them look like the superior school even if A&M continues to improve moderately
As things stand right now it looks like the horns will continue to play OU at a neutral site and there will be close to zero compelling match-ups for the horn fans to enjoy on their field - what better way to shore up that problem than by continuing to play the aggies out of conference?
Dunno, whole thing has become more petty than rational best I can tell - overall if A&M moves to the SEC I kinda think they can afford to lose the game against Texas ... at least when that game is replaced by games against LSU, Alabama, Auburn, Arkansas, and the occasional UGA/FLA/Tenn thrown in
Texas is teh one who should be more interested in continuing to play the A&M series - they will probably continue to largely dominate the heads up matchup and that will make them look like the superior school even if A&M continues to improve moderately
As things stand right now it looks like the horns will continue to play OU at a neutral site and there will be close to zero compelling match-ups for the horn fans to enjoy on their field - what better way to shore up that problem than by continuing to play the aggies out of conference?
Dunno, whole thing has become more petty than rational best I can tell - overall if A&M moves to the SEC I kinda think they can afford to lose the game against Texas ... at least when that game is replaced by games against LSU, Alabama, Auburn, Arkansas, and the occasional UGA/FLA/Tenn thrown in
Posted on 8/28/11 at 7:46 am to molsusports
Geez, these UTa guys and their "A&M has no money because they used a loan" bullshite.
It's not like we weren't generating revenue. We are Top 20 in the nation in revenue generated in a bad year. We just needed/wanted to spend a little more to do some catching up with facilities. Luckily, our university has enough money to do that and it not be a big deal. FTR, then President Gates offered the loan. The AD didn't even ask for it. But, Gates wanted to speed up the process.
It will be nice in the SEC though. In the SEC athletic departments loan the academic side money. Now that's a cash cow I'm looking forward to
nb4longhornaclaimA&Misonlyleavingformoney
It's not like we weren't generating revenue. We are Top 20 in the nation in revenue generated in a bad year. We just needed/wanted to spend a little more to do some catching up with facilities. Luckily, our university has enough money to do that and it not be a big deal. FTR, then President Gates offered the loan. The AD didn't even ask for it. But, Gates wanted to speed up the process.
It will be nice in the SEC though. In the SEC athletic departments loan the academic side money. Now that's a cash cow I'm looking forward to
nb4longhornaclaimA&Misonlyleavingformoney
Posted on 8/28/11 at 10:03 am to molsusports
quote:
Texas is teh one who should be more interested in continuing to play the A&M series - they will probably continue to largely dominate the heads up matchup and that will make them look like the superior school even if A&M continues to improve moderately
Not a bad post except for this. A&M has won the last 3 out of 5, and over my lifetime (30 years) we've split the series, so the longhorns aren't dominating any longer. They just scream that they do loudly, and often, so people believe it.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 10:08 am to AAM02
The Ags lead in the last 35 years...once scholarship limitations were put into place, the oil rick bastards in austin could not buy every high school athlete (at least without getting caught). eric dickerson nailed FUTEXAS in his 30/30 how they CHEATED like crazy.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 11:04 am to Atari
quote:
I care about the future and if we can bury aggy by not playing them again and forcing them to play all of their away games outside of the state of Texas, I'm all for it.
What makes you think that Texas A&M wouldn't be able to schedule games against TCU, Houston, Rice, or any of the other FBS schools in Texas (other than perhaps Texas Tech and Baylor) if they wanted to have away games inside the state of Texas? It won't really affect their strength of schedule... their conference schedule will take care of that.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 11:29 am to Atari
quote:
I care about the future and if we can bury aggy by not playing them again and forcing them to play all of their away games outside of the state of Texas, I'm all for it.
As said on another board, if you get a divorce you don't invite your ex-wife over for Thanksgiving dinner anymore. Why should we want anything to do with the petty, jealous bitches?
What a bunch of sandy vaginas UT has. You sound like the jealous bitches.
quote:
I don't think we should be giving them a national marquee game in the state of Texas if they bail.
Wut? You don't think playing Alabama or LSU at Kyle Field on CBS is a marquee game? BTW A National Network > an obscure cable Network that not everyone will carry.
Any whoo, the rest of your bitter tirade makes little sense. Why would they want to play many away games in state?
Posted on 8/28/11 at 11:38 am to CrazyTigerFan
Given that Baylor only purchased 981 visiting team tickets the last time the two teams played (despite being only 90 miles up the road), why bother scheduling them?
(Only Iowa State purchased fewer tickets, but at least they have an excuse being so far away.)
Tech hasn't been that noisy about this whole mess, they will probably get a home-and-home at some point.
(Only Iowa State purchased fewer tickets, but at least they have an excuse being so far away.)
Tech hasn't been that noisy about this whole mess, they will probably get a home-and-home at some point.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:48 pm to Uncle Stu
quote:
Everyone is sick and friggin tired of UT walking around on uneven ground and acting like they own the place. Other universities no longer are OK with UT blatantly taking an unequal share of the pie. They're sick of it and they're leaving for greener pastures, where the revenue sharing is equal.
A&M has voted for unequal revenue sharing every time n the Big 12. It was unequal revenue sharing last summer that kept A&M in the Big 12, about $7 million more/year than 70% of the conference membership. Of course, once ESPN surprised everyone with $15 million/year just for Texas, well, then equality became very important for A&M.
quote:
That doesnt mean that within the realm of competitive sports the rivalry isnt still there. That doesnt mean that you two should stop playing. If you want to stop playing A&M then you're just a bitter old ex-girlfriend who's scared of getting hurt again.
I can only speak for myself. I am glad A&M is thrilled about being the Summer of 2011 conference realignment champions. I just want to wash my hands of A&M. I want to be done with them. We have dealt with decades of endless complaining. I don't want us to interact with them any more. I want the bitching to stop once and for all. It is what is best for both schools.
quote:
It must suck to be a UTa fan... the only game you'll play worth a frick will be OU... if they stay.
Do you really believe that? A quick look at out future schedules would make you realize that is a silly statement.
quote:
And I may be in the minority, but I am one Aggie who actually agrees with Dr. D that it's in both schools' best interests to end the relationship.
Amen to that.
quote:
I dunno. Seems like ut fans would have a reason to care now, like to show it was a mistake to leave or something.
How could it be a mistake for A&M to leave? The fans want it, the administrators want it. I am no Baylor fan staring C-USA in the face. A&M will be fine, Texas will be fine.
quote:
Remember when I said all UTexas is "is spin?" Well, this is a subsection of that. The horns want to put up a front that they aren't playing A&M, ever, again. But they want to keep playing A&M, to preserve a top-10 All Time rivalry game
Based on everything I have read form multiple source, the Texas AD is set on ending the series. Of course that isn't a guarantee but I am convinced it will happen.
quote:
what is UT's take on aTm fans and their gameday expperience? Do they travel well...what kind of reputation do they have?
A&M has their weird traditions but most of the folks are fine and they travel well. I have 2 aggie brother-in-laws that are good guys. College Station is a unique gameday experience.
quote:
How would any tu-A&M matchup be on LHN when the Tier 1 and Tier 2 networks can choose to air the game before it even gets to LHN? And doesn't the agreement still require the other school's consent even for an OOC game?
ESPN would love to have it on LHN and Texas would make sure that, if the game is forced upon them, that is where it went. ESPN would pay Fox whatever is necessary.
As for your 2nd question, an OOC opponent's consent is not required.
quote:
F the U of TEXAS! Selfish, arrogant, bastards...aTm is doing what's best for them and FU TEXAS cannot handle it!!! "we're texas" symbolizes all of you. Dr. Drunkenwhatever, I am willing to bet u never graduated from that place.
I'm glad A&M is doing what it wants. I wish it was over already. As for the graduation talk, this is a favorite attack of Texas Tech fans. Yes, I got my undergrad degree from Texas.
quote:
If UT has no desire to play aggy in the future there is no way the legislature can force it. There are too many UT, TT and BU legislators to allow it out of committee. At least that's what I'm told by Texas co-workers.
I hope your co-workers are right. Still, Texas politicians are crazy and are capable of anything.
quote:
Longhorns should realize that if they end the series they look like weak bitches. Them considering no longer playing us is already making them look like weak bitches. If I were a longhorn I'd be embarrassed that the idea is even being floated.
Whatever.....I just want a complete break from everything having to do with Texas A&M.
quote:
As things stand right now it looks like the horns will continue to play OU at a neutral site and there will be close to zero compelling match-ups for the horn fans to enjoy on their field
We will have compelling games against top tier programs on our home field. We'll be fine.
quote:
We are Top 20 in the nation in revenue generated in a bad year. We just needed/wanted to spend a little more to do some catching up with facilities. Luckily, our university has enough money to do that and it not be a big deal.
Recently, your university with "enough money" had to abandon on-campus toilet paper.
Texas A&M can't spare a square
Posted on 8/28/11 at 2:02 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
(Original Questions)
How would any tu-A&M matchup be on LHN when the Tier 1 and Tier 2 networks can choose to air the game before it even gets to LHN? And doesn't the agreement still require the other school's consent even for an OOC game?
(Response)
ESPN would love to have it on LHN and Texas would make sure that, if the game is forced upon them, that is where it went. ESPN would pay Fox whatever is necessary.
As for your 2nd question, an OOC opponent's consent is not required.
Thanks for the response, seriously.
I can't see A&M agreeing to play Texas in any of the major sports (not just football) where the game would be broadcast exclusively on LHN. And maybe not any of the minor ones either.
So if you think the rivalry is coming to an end you're probably right.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 2:15 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
ESPN would love to have it on LHN and Texas would make sure that, if the game is forced upon them
I can see Texas doing that, if the game was forced on them, but it wold make little sense for ESPN to broadcast it there, rather than ESPN unless they figure they could get new subscribers to pick up the game.
The idea of the LHN being the home of all UT home games like ND on NBC sounds like a pipe dream. Big name OOC opponents might not have strict veto power per se, but they could say they would only play UT if the game was on a regular network. Why would you want to play a marquee OOC game and have it broadcast on an obscure network? The money would not be greater and there would be less exposure, less access to highlights. Rice and New Mexico would be on the LHN, Notre Dame, I doubt it.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 3:18 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
The idea of the LHN being the home of all UT home games like ND on NBC sounds like a pipe dream. Big name OOC opponents might not have strict veto power per se, but they could say they would only play UT if the game was on a regular network. Why would you want to play a marquee OOC game and have it broadcast on an obscure network?
That is the point.
This is a unique circumstance.
When Texas plays a marquee OOC game it will always be on something like ESPN or ABC primetime. Putting this game on the LHN is my theory and would only come about if the legislature says Texas and A&M have to keep playing each other.
Apparently, this is not without precedent:
quote:
The Florida Times-Union, January 23, 1955, page 66 The University of Florida and Florida State University which haven't been able to agree on a football game may be forced to if a bill being drafted for the 1955 legislature becomes law. State Senator Harry Stratton of Callahan said yesterday such a measure was being drawn by Assistant Attorney General Tom Henderson and he planned to introduce it on the first day of the session which begins in April. Competition between the two state schools has been strongly urged from several quarters in the past few years. Florida athletic director and coach Bob Woodruff and FSU athletic director Howard Danford discussed the issue at a December conference but no agreement was reached. Dr. Danford said Woodruff had offered to meet FSU in minor sports provided Florida State did not seek competition in football, basketball or baseball. Woodruff said Florida would be unable to schedule FSU in the major sports because of its Southeastern Conference commitments and traditional rivalry with the University of Miami. Senator Stratton, who said he expected to have several co-sponsors of the bill, said "we won't attempt to try to make them play this coming year but we intend to try to make them play in 1956 if possible, preferably in Jacksonville." He said the bill is being copied after the Wisconsin law. The Wisconsin legislature passed an act forcing football games between the University of Wisconsin and Marquette University after the University of Wisconsin refused to meet Marquette. Other schools which have been compelled by law to play each other are the University of Alabama and Auburn, Georgia and Georgia Tech, and Clemson and South Carolina.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 3:29 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
Putting this game on the LHN is my theory and would only come about if the legislature says Texas and A&M have to keep playing each other
that's possible if the leg forces them to play, but there would be too much moeny left on the table. ESPN would carry the game at CS, I doubt they would join Texas in cutting off their nose to spite their face.
To not play this OOC game over A&M bolting for the SEC makes UT look petty and bitter, sorry.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 7:06 pm to CassiusClay
quote:
...screwy our legal system is. Meet any lawyer who does Texas law and they'll say the same thing.
My limited exposure to TX law would confirm that. Compared to other over-lawyered states like LA & FL, TX is a whole other country.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 7:12 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
Not true. A&M's stance last summer was that we wanted equal revenue sharing. Since that wasn't agreed upon we insisted on the best deal possible that we could get for ourselves. We weren't sitting backseat to anybody.
I listened to Dr. Loftin speak about this yesterday
I listened to Dr. Loftin speak about this yesterday
Posted on 8/28/11 at 7:20 pm to PowerTool
quote:
And I may be in the minority, but I am one Aggie who actually agrees with Dr. D that it's in both schools' best interests to end the relationship.
Auburn and Alabama did not play football for about twenty years in a dispute over travel allowances--a real case of legislative involvement.
I think that even if these two stopped playing it would only be for a while.
Who else would ATM sing about? Who else would UT make fun of? They are co-dependent whether in the same conference or not.
Look at other intrastate rivals not in the same conference--UGA-Ga Tech, UF-FSU--they are big rivalries. A few years of not playing will only make these two more bitter. They will likely start facing each other in Jerry's World each year.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 8:07 pm to Hoya Saxa
quote:
Who else would ATM sing about?
Who does Alabama sing about? Sewanee and Georgia Tech, among others. They haven't been in a conference with a 1 of those in 50+ years.
Georgetown mentions a number of their very old rivals. They even sing about Harvard who it appears they have never played in football.
Illinois.. they mention Princeton and have never played them.
Kansas AFAIK still mentions Nebraska.
Who will Texas sing of? A&M is in the 2nd line of Texas Fight.
Virginia Texas mentions a number of schools they have hardly played.
No matter what happens to the series, we'll still reference them in the War Hymn. The hate will not die. Fsck em.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 9:00 pm to relapse98
Personally, the talk and possible decision of them not play us anymore is great PR for us. Our president has said all the right things.
We want whats best for A&M ($$$, visibility, and stability), and whats best for the state (continue to play whorns, and facilitate finding a replacement team).
Now the news out of Austin is they will run home crying and never play us again, and they will block a move to allow another large state public institution (UH) to join a BCS conference and will target ND (pipe dream) or BYU.
If they wanna be idiots and sour their national perception, go for it.
In the end, A&M will come out ahead and will no longer have to worry about being in a stable conference. Texas on the other hand, has a lot of question marks ahead and is now sitting on an embarassing failure known as the LHN.
We want whats best for A&M ($$$, visibility, and stability), and whats best for the state (continue to play whorns, and facilitate finding a replacement team).
Now the news out of Austin is they will run home crying and never play us again, and they will block a move to allow another large state public institution (UH) to join a BCS conference and will target ND (pipe dream) or BYU.
If they wanna be idiots and sour their national perception, go for it.
In the end, A&M will come out ahead and will no longer have to worry about being in a stable conference. Texas on the other hand, has a lot of question marks ahead and is now sitting on an embarassing failure known as the LHN.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 9:07 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
Notre Dame would top the Big 12 wish list, according to sources.
Popular
Back to top


1


