- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Auburn wants to leave West & Bama doesnt want Mizzou
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:17 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:17 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Bama can frick itself with their entitlement mentality and thinking they are more important than any other school.
You're not going to get mad and poison our trees are you?
0
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:17 am to BamaInHsv
quote:It's not like you'd never play again, it just wouldn't be every year. It'd be BIGGER than what it is now.quote:I can see something like this being said by an LSU fan, who has no real rival. You don't just "let go" of your all-time historical rival.
Alabama really needs to let this Tennessee shite go. It's just not feasible with the scheduling realities that are coming.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:18 am to beatbammer
quote:
And wanting them to do it JUST ONCE seems to be a bridge too far for them to go.
WELL, THEY AND TENNESSEE ARE THE frickING SEC.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:18 am to LSU Tigerhead
Can we send ole miss or msu to the east?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:19 am to beatbammer
Bama has two rivalries, UT and au, not sure who added LSU. Under no circumstance should Bama need to give one up, while playing in the same conference.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:19 am to beatbammer
quote:
Bama and Tennessee ARE the fricking SEC.
quote:
Ahhhhh... so THAT'S what he's talking about!
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:20 am to razthecat
quote:
wait, so it's ok for Auburn to want to bring in Mizz so they can jet to the east and secure their traditional match ups/rivalry but Alabama and UT are being difficult by saying no because they want to secure their traditional match ups/rivalry?
If Bama wants to keep the TN matchup over the Iron Bowl, then I say let them. It's fine. As stated earlier, Auburn had to give up its traditional matchups in '92. Make the move and let Bama chose which rivalry they want to continue. Seems fair to me?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:20 am to beatbammer
quote:
Exactly. Bama has not and nor have they ever been made to sacrifice or give up jack squat.
Look 2 posts up, brah
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:20 am to bona fide
quote:
Bama has two rivalries, UT and au, not sure who added LSU.
LSU fans.
Auburn and UT are our RIVALS...LSU is an opponent.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 9:21 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:22 am to Josh Fenderman
quote:
Look 2 posts up, brah
who said you couldn't schedule ga tech in an occ game?
Or am i missing something?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:22 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
I'd be happy to give up the Iron Bowl and let Bama keep the TN game.
Pussy.
I just can't picture Missouri as an SEC team. It's weirder than A&M
I'm sure we'll put a stop to it though.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:23 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
As stated earlier, Auburn had to give up its traditional matchups in '92.
Bama only has 2 traditional rivalries. Lsu, om, and msu aren't rivalries. We're not going to give up one of the two we care about.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:24 am to pvilleguru
quote:
We're not going to give up one of the two we care about.
When the time comes, you won't have a choice in the matter.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:24 am to razthecat
quote:
wait, so it's ok for Auburn to want to bring in Mizz so they can jet to the east and secure their traditional match ups/rivalry but Alabama and UT are being difficult by saying no because they want to secure their traditional match ups/rivalry?
When they went to divisions, they needed Auburn to bend and give up the UT rivalry. Auburn gave.
When they decided it was best to go to only ONE permanent non-division rival, they needed Auburn to bend and give up the UF rivarlry. Auburn gave.
Please explain to me, in today's SEC, when has Bama given? Giving up your long-term, traditional rivalry with Vanderbilt? Kentucky? You poor babies. It must have been so hard.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:24 am to piggidyphish
quote:
And wanting them to do it JUST ONCE seems to be a bridge too far for them to go.
quote:
WELL, THEY AND TENNESSEE ARE THE frickING SEC.
We ain't fricking giving in!!!!!
Just kidding, I have no idea how this will all pan out in the end.
I hate to see us end up without a storied rivalry like UT and I think UT feels the same way.
I hate to see the SEC bring in Mizz at this juncture in the conference realignment process. IMO, the SEC is the premiere conference, they don't have to make a decision right now. Wait it out and see what the landscape looks like this time next year.......
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:24 am to The White Lobster
quote:
Pussy.
Not really. Personally, I think the matchup between Bama and Auburn in the SEC Championship game would be epic and far outstrip the Iron Bowl. The Iron Bowl is every year. A matchup in the championship game might be every decade. Much bigger IMO.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:25 am to DvlsAdvocat
quote:
LSU fans.
Except that wasn't said by an LSU fan....
LSU fans know Alabama isn't a true rivalry game. It's just a game that lately has had huge conference implications.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:25 am to RT1941
quote:
Bama and Tennessee ARE the fricking SEC.
Right here. Entitlement. Stupidity. Delusion.
All wrapped up in one lil phrase. Thanks for proving my point gump.
Again, bama can frick itself and its entitlement (and I will add delusion) mentality.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:27 am to piggidyphish
quote:
don't be pissy with us for being proactive
Seriously? You really believe it is a matterof being proactive? For this to be true AU would have to be the very thing you claim Bama is not - more important than other in conference. So AU just said "move us to the East" and the conference just said "OK"? Nope. You were approached about the idea BY the conference and you REACTED to that idea favorably.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 9:27 am to beatbammer
quote:
When they went to divisions, they needed Auburn to bend and give up the UT rivalry. Auburn gave.
When they decided it was best to go to only ONE permanent non-division rival, they needed Auburn to bend and give up the UF rivarlry. Auburn gave.
Please explain to me, in today's SEC, when has Bama given? Giving up your long-term, traditional rivalry with Vanderbilt? Kentucky? You poor babies. It must have been so hard.
Page 7 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News