- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Who was really impressed with Chavis this season?
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:18 pm
I was never impressed with him this season at any point. Yes, we improved a lot from last year, but impressed? This isn't a huge loss if he leaves IMO
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:20 pm to cbhughes
Me. Dramatically improved the D after last season.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:20 pm to cbhughes
quote:
This isn't a huge loss if he leaves IMO
It's a huge loss if we can't replace him with someone better.
Is he worth $600k/year as an elite DC? I would say no, but if there is no one better out there for Miles to hire, then keeping Chavis is better than losing him.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:22 pm to cbhughes
Not Impressed at all. Any improvement from the year before is laughable. The prior defense was like swiss cheese. This d still gives up way too much yardage and seems passive at times.....ie 3rd and Chavis. Was he an improvement? Yes. Is he the answer? I seriously doubt it.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:23 pm to drizztiger
he sounded like Brian Kelly in the press conference today- he's gone.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:24 pm to cbhughes
Then Miles needs to do his job and initiate contact with prospective replacements.
This post was edited on 12/30/09 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:27 pm to drizztiger
im sure he has already done so...reggie herring...mark snyder....tyrone nix...jim herrmann...todd grantham...george edwards
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:28 pm to LSUchick2007
quote:
im sure he has already done so
I don't particularly trust his preparedness, so I wouldn't be "sure". I hope he has though.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:30 pm to drizztiger
I'm sure Miles knows what he's got in this cat, and is/has surveyed his prospective replacements.
With the flux in the coaching ranks what it is, it's the head coach and AD's jobs to keep a current roster of prospective hires for each coaching staff position. After all, looking at Chavis' form, he's one biskit away from a massive coronary. . .
With the flux in the coaching ranks what it is, it's the head coach and AD's jobs to keep a current roster of prospective hires for each coaching staff position. After all, looking at Chavis' form, he's one biskit away from a massive coronary. . .
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:31 pm to drizztiger
he replaced porter and gonzales pretty quick. plus if we really are gonna dish out 600K im sure we could get whoever we wanted. that would be almost double nix's salary and probably close to or more what herring, edwards,grantham, herrmann make as NFL position coaches. snyder is unemployed so any would be good for him
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:37 pm to cbhughes
quote:
I was never impressed with him this season at any point. Yes, we improved a lot from last year, but impressed? This isn't a huge loss if he leaves IMO
It takes more than one year to install an entirely different system.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:37 pm to cbhughes
3rd and chavis was a bitch but overall we improved and ranked pretty high nationally in scoring D in his first year. we could do a hell of a lot worse IMO.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:38 pm to LSUchick2007
quote:
LSUchick2007
I won't disagree. I certainly hope Miles is testing the waters and keeping his options open for all scenarios.
This post was edited on 12/30/09 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:46 pm to cbhughes
quote:
Who was really impressed with Chavis
Does this include 3rd downs or no?
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:52 pm to ezride25
quote:
Does this include 3rd downs or no?
10th in the SEC on defense 3rd down conversion % isn't too impressive.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:55 pm to cbhughes
i dont want him to leave but i wouldn't be upset by it. He improved us alot but i dont really like his scheme
Posted on 12/30/09 at 6:07 pm to drizztiger
quote:
10th in the SEC on defense 3rd down conversion % isn't too impressive.
Would you feel better if we were ranked 4th in the SEC?
...because the difference between being ranked 10th and 4th is approximately ONE extra 3rd down stop every 2.4 games.
Statistically, LSU was slightly above average on 3rd down nationally. The SEC has 10 teams packed in the top 44 nationally. There simply isn't much difference between 4th and 10th...and the 3rd down conversion rate wasn't nearly as big of a problem as you think it was.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 6:19 pm to moneyg
quote:
the 3rd down conversion rate wasn't nearly as big of a problem as you think it was.
No, the overall percentage wasn't a huge problem. The timing of 3rd down conversions and lack of three and outs was more of the issue.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 6:24 pm to drizztiger
Although it was LSU's worst 3rd down conversion defense in the last 5 seasons.
2005 - 2 LSU 28.2
2006 - 16 LSU 31.9
2007 - 29 LSU 35.2
2008 - 12 LSU 31.15
2009 - 44 LSU 36.76
2005 - 2 LSU 28.2
2006 - 16 LSU 31.9
2007 - 29 LSU 35.2
2008 - 12 LSU 31.15
2009 - 44 LSU 36.76
Posted on 12/30/09 at 6:26 pm to drizztiger
For what its worth:
WASH: 478
VANDY: 210
ULL: 272
MSU: 374
UGA: 274
FLA: 327
AUB: 193
TUL: 216
BAMA: 452
LA TECH: 322
OLE MISS: 426
ARK: 375
WASH: 478
VANDY: 210
ULL: 272
MSU: 374
UGA: 274
FLA: 327
AUB: 193
TUL: 216
BAMA: 452
LA TECH: 322
OLE MISS: 426
ARK: 375
Popular
Back to top

9





