re: Napier would be offered before Aranda

After the last couple of whiffs from your sources, I figured you would avoid this board this time

Everyone knows you don't know shite

It’s Riley. Campbell. Napier. As of right now. And u fully expect Riley.

quote:

---

Napier would get 3 yrs to get us in playoff if he's not goodbye.

Same timeline as any coach we get.

---

as in 4 team playoff??? cause if so that is fricking stupid.

we have a complete rebuild. 8-4 is about best we could be next year. 9-3 at absolute max

next year prolly 9-2, 10-2

year 3 you could compete but jeus we are going to fire a coach if he goes say 11-1 and we dont get in? wtf?? even 10-2 in his 3rd season and suddenly we are firing coaches?


where the frick do some of yall come up with this shite?? seriously?

we spend half as much as Bama, A&M and UGA on football and way less than all 3 in recruting and suddenly we are firign coaches for not making the playoffs in year 3??

quote:

---

Magician2

---

seriously thought way more of you as a poster, seriously one of the dumbest takes i have ever seen.

fire a coach after 3 years for not making playoffs??? thats how you end up as texas.

So you're saying Scott isn't "whaling", he's "crawfishing"?

quote:

---

He called Mathieu getting kicked off the team

---

I knew that before it hit the board lol.

So he called 2 things right. What about the other 30 he had wrong? Do we just dismiss that?

These 'insiders' run here when they hear anything. They're attention whores. All of them.

Isn't it weird that we've covered like 40 bases across our insiders on here. Means they don't know anything, which is a good thing.

quote:

---

2 ways to interpret that:
1. Someone thinks that Napier is better qualified and suited for the job.
OR
2. That same person has gauged Aranda's interest and/or likelihood of taking the job and has determined it is not likely. I think Aranda is more set on USC.

---

3. Keeping any heat off Aranda (11th ranked team) while talks progress.

Put the Meth pipe down dude.

quote:

---

After the last couple of whiffs from your sources, I figured you would avoid this board this time

Everyone knows you don't know shite

---

This is BS. Name one “insider” that is right 100% of the time.
Random shares what he hears and most of it has been correct.

Need to purge this admin including Woody if this is true. I don't think Napier is a bad choice but before Aranda is silly. Napier is way riskier with arguably the same coaching ceiling as Aranda.

1.) you're familiar with Aranda and already know what he's capable of doing. he's a genius and much of the credit O got should've went to Aranda.

2.) He stuck with this program through the shite show knowing Miles was on the chopping block. He's loyal. He's a professional that never complains.

3.) He's more proven than Napier in his shorter tenure at Baylor

Who the frick in their right mind would offer Napier before Aranda unless Aranda just told LSU NO. Oh, that's right. I get it. Most of this admin is more interested in sucking on Saban's testicles and still thinking they can get someone off his coaching tree that will be like him. Yeah, no.

quote:

---

Random shares what he hears and most of it has been correct.

---

Lol no.

Hes at 5%, if that