- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Josh Heupel is who we need
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:46 am to JackieSonnier
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:46 am to JackieSonnier
Josh Heupel is not trading Danny White and beautiful Knoxville for Baton Rouge and da govnah
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:48 am to Rrrrroger
Don't worry bud, we aren't coming for Josh.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:50 am to Tunasntigers92
You will be hiring far worse in case you’re unaware
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:54 am to Rrrrroger
Like who? I want you to tell me so I can bookmark it.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 6:24 am to JackieSonnier
He will be OU 2027 head coach once Venables doesn’t make playoffs by next year.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 6:47 am to Grimetime
quote:
If it's not Lane, it will be Heupel.
Heupel is NOT going to downgrade to LSU.
Name one metric that is better at LSU.
City? Get real. Knoxville>>>Ghetto Rouge.
NIL collective? UT has one of the best. LSU has one of the worst.
AD? Not even close. Danny White is currently the best AD in the nation.
Money? NOPE! We are rolling in it at the moment. WE HAVE MORE MONEY THAN YOU!
Better chancelloer and president? Another not even close.
Plowman and White have made the athletic Department at Tennessee one of the premier places to coach.
You are delusional. LSU is no longer a premier job. You are dumpster fire at the moment.
You're not getting:
Heupel
Kiffin
Freeman
OR ANY OTHER SPLASH HIRE!
You are getting either a coordinator, a small school coach, or a Verge Ausberry DEI hire.
Bookmark this comment.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:18 am to JackieSonnier
Why hire someone who will role out the second he is offered the OU job??
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:33 am to JackieSonnier
If you like Heupel, just get Golesh, who I think runs that offense better.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:08 am to koLSU86
quote:
Not that they’re not still good offensively, but their most productive offensive years were when Golesh was the OC.
Josh Heupel QB production by year as stand alone OC/HC:
2016: Drew Lock 24td 10int
2017: Drew Lock 45td 11int
2018: McKenzie Milton 34td 6 INT
2019: Dillon Gabriel 33td 7int
2020: Dillon Gabriel 34td 4int (in 10g)
2021: Hendon Hooker 36 TD 3int
2022:Hendon Hooker 32td 2INT
2023: Joe Milton 27td 5int
2024: Nico Iamleava 22td 5int
2025: joey aguilar 20td 6int
Are we really going to sit here and pretend Heupel's success stems from Alex Golesh lol
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:13 am to Thunderfist
My god dude. How many savageorangecankle alters does this make now?
Posted on 11/1/25 at 9:23 am to JackieSonnier
It would just be great if he could shave before a game.
Geez… put it in his contract. You’re on national television guy… have a little self respect.
Geez… put it in his contract. You’re on national television guy… have a little self respect.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 10:53 am to JackieSonnier
He’s not worth the heup
Posted on 11/1/25 at 10:58 am to Rrrrroger
quote:
Josh Heupel is not trading Danny White and beautiful Knoxville for Baton Rouge and da govnah
Josh Heupel will be taken to some restaurants in BR and New Orleans and take a pay cut to come to Louisiana.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 11:50 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Are we really going to sit here and pretend Heupel's success stems from Alex Golesh lol
Where the did I say that? I guess reading is hard? I said the most productive offenses statistically since Heupel was hired were when Golesh was the OC. I didn’t say they were bad offensively since he left or that Heupel is a bad coach. He’s a great offensive coach. No doubt about it, but it’s just an observation and not a hit against Heupel. I even said it in the original post that they’re still good on offense. Jump to conclusions much?
Posted on 11/1/25 at 11:56 am to koLSU86
I can read. You implied that the level of success those years was due to Golesh, when Heupel's sustained success stands alone just fine.
Or perhaps it was Hendon Hooker, who of course, is one of the many to thrive under Heupel's direction.
Or perhaps it was Hendon Hooker, who of course, is one of the many to thrive under Heupel's direction.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:01 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
You implied that the level of success those years was due to Golesh, when Heupel's sustained success stands alone just fine.
I implied that they had better offensive production when Golesh was there as a team, and had a drop off in yards and points scored after he left…. I didn’t say a word about Heupel not sustaining success, because he obviously has. Are you Heupels pastry supplier or something?
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:09 pm to koLSU86
nah, but if you have to prop someone up with anecdotal information, he may not be the guy to focus on.
Popular
Back to top


2




