- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Baker to Tulane the right decision for him?
Posted on 12/5/25 at 2:23 am to WaterLink
Posted on 12/5/25 at 2:23 am to WaterLink
These days it seems it's fewer guys getting head coaching jobs from only being coordinators. I think becoming a G5 head coach at a place like Tulane (one of the best G5 programs in the country) is a plum job.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 2:55 am to John Rambeaux
Two more years at LSU gets him more than 2 years at Tulane. Far more to be accomplished at LSU in two years than Tulane. 2 more years at LSU and you get a job offer way better than Tulane.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 3:09 am to Goldfinger
Not really sure how you can make that argument when the coach of Tulane just got the UF job.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 3:37 am to NOSA
What’s the history of the glory of the Florida job? Err. none. Those guys are long gone. Everyone is poaching Florida and that dude isn’t gonna stop it. Billy 2.0.
This post was edited on 12/5/25 at 3:49 am
Posted on 12/5/25 at 6:52 am to John Rambeaux
That decision is up to Baker. He wants to be a HC and I do believe he will be a good HC. Whenever he wants to make the move will be when he deems it the right time.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:02 am to John Rambeaux
I think it is a good decision either way. I hope he chooses to stay and go straight to a P5 HC job in 2-3 years.
This post was edited on 12/5/25 at 8:02 am
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:21 am to Goldfinger
quote:
Two more years at LSU gets him more than 2 years at Tulane. Far more to be accomplished at LSU in two years than Tulane. 2 more years at LSU and you get a job offer way better than Tulane.
Do some of you even watch what actually happens? Jesus
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:24 am to John Rambeaux
Tulane has emerged as one of the better G5 programs in this era. Both previous HCs got P4 HC jobs, one at Florida.
And its his alma mater
So yeah its a no brainer
And its his alma mater
So yeah its a no brainer
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:44 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
I think it is a good decision either way. I hope he chooses to stay and go straight to a P5 HC job in 2-3 years.
I hope he stays too, because I think that’s the only way we can truly compete for a championship in ‘26. If he leaves, I think there will just be too much turnover to realistically expect to be up there with the top teams and Lane should probably pivot and set his sights on ‘27 as the year to seriously make a run at an NC.
I don’t know if he’s capable of that, I just mean maybe focus more on portal guys with multiple years of eligibility remaining instead of 1 and dones. Maybe focus more on developing young talent already on the team and developing them to be ready to dominate in ‘27 as 2nd or 3rd year starters. I’m not saying punt on ‘26–still try to put together a team that can compete for a playoff spot, but just not at the expense of the ‘27 team. We’ll see how he balances the short term with the long term.
But as far as Baker is concerned, he’s got to take the Tulane job if offered. The timing is perfect for him. Could he stick around at LSU and get a P4 job? Sure. But it would be a South Carolina, Arkansas, Mississippi State type gig. Recent history shows it’s better to be G5 HC and have success and bounce to a bigger job than to go straight from being a DC, regardless of the team’s success. We could win the next 2 NCs, and Lane would get almost all the credit.
And besides Tulane being his alma mater, the fact that their last 3 coaches got P4 gigs after having success there, he’s also coached at LSU for 3 years, and LA Tech for however many he was there. So he has relationships with high school coaches and knows how to recruit the state of Louisiana. And he’ll likely take some guys from the LSU staff with him that have experience recruiting Louisiana as well.
And Lane says he’s going after THE BEST players, not just taking guys because they are from this school or that school. So Blake might be able to grab some Louisiana guys—especially from New Orleans—that might have normally signed with LSU but weren’t good enough to play here, but might wind up being significant contributors at Tulane.
So, I think that any DC should probably strongly consider the HC gig at Tulane. Even if they had zero ties to the school or the state of Louisiana. Just because of the recent success of their HCs getting P4 jobs. But Baker is uniquely qualified for that particular job even more due to his ties there. Timing is so important when it comes to these decisions. And I can’t see there being a better time/opportunity for Blake to make the jump than right now at Tulane. He can’t turn it down.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:51 am to SulphursFinest
quote:
Considering the last Tulane coach just went to Florida, I don’t think it’s a bad decision
Hard to argue with this logic. But would have loved to see how Blake could have developed from mixing it up, X's & O's with Lane for a couple of years. I don't think moving to the next step is as clear an open & shut case, even looking at career end goals.
Blake has to choose his path.
Either a Tiger or a Greenie Weenie Tiger Bait.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:59 am to 3rdGenTiger
If Baker is good at Tulane, he will be a much hotter commodity than Sumrall given his previous resume and recognition. And Sumrall got a great job. So...
Yeah
Yeah
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:18 am to John Rambeaux
quote:
Is Baker to Tulane the right decision for him?
Yes, Tulane has a track record now of sending coaches to major programs. Also, being in the American Conference, he can make a good run for 2 years and bounce to an elite HC job. I want him to stay, selfishly, but Tulane is a great school to use as a stepping stone.
If Tulane was to join the ACC, i dont know where they stand in terms of HC opportunities.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:25 am to BigGreenTiger
quote:
Also, being in the American Conference, he can make a good run for 2 years and bounce to an elite HC job.
Will say the same thing about BB as I did with Sumrall 2 years ago.
If Blake keeps us winning 9+ games a year and continues getting into and possibly winning the conference championship. I will write the best recommendation letter to whichever Power job is looking for him to be their next HC.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:30 am to dupergreenie
The only reason I would be worried is Tulane really has nowhere to go but down
If he goes 8-4 for 4 straight seasons that will be considered “bad” and not sure will garner interest from big programs
But ultimately I think it’s smart to take the job
If he goes 8-4 for 4 straight seasons that will be considered “bad” and not sure will garner interest from big programs
But ultimately I think it’s smart to take the job
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:42 am to lsupride87
quote:
Tulane really has nowhere to go but down
Uhhh....no....he could maintain what Fritz and Sumrall did.
Our 2026 schedule isn't overly tough. No Ole Miss.
@Duke
South Alabama
@ Kansas St
Southern Miss
We do play Memphis, UTSA and @ USF.
Sumrall went 9-5 last year with 3 straight losses and was in consideration for the North Carolina job. He did bring us to the Conference championship game last year though.
The 2027 OOC schedule is even easier so there shouldn't be any reason why he should go 8-4 next year.
Baker should be able to win 9-10 games at Tulane. Just hire a competent OC.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:45 am to dupergreenie
quote:Umm, thanks for saying exactly the same thing
Uhhh....no....he could maintain what Fritz and Sumrall did.
He has to maintain 10-2 or better to match what the previous coaches did. That’s a tough situation. Also known as “nowhere to go but down”. This is a compliment to Tulane
This post was edited on 12/5/25 at 9:47 am
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:51 am to lsupride87
Yeah but implying 'nowhere to go but down' implies that they couldn't just maintain the program.
I think he will maintain it. Sumrall brought in some decent recruits and after it leaked that Baker was going to Tulane we had a 4* IOL sign and a former Oklahoma St commit commit to us.
We also don't do bad in the portal.
I think he will maintain it. Sumrall brought in some decent recruits and after it leaked that Baker was going to Tulane we had a 4* IOL sign and a former Oklahoma St commit commit to us.
We also don't do bad in the portal.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:54 am to dupergreenie
Tulane needs to keep doing what they are doing. Yes, Baker will leave for a better job in 3 years or so, but that's ok.
If they keep making themselves a place where good coaches go to take the next step, then they make themselves an elite G5 school.
If they do what they did many years ago and get sick of it and hire someone that they think won't leave...mistake
If they keep making themselves a place where good coaches go to take the next step, then they make themselves an elite G5 school.
If they do what they did many years ago and get sick of it and hire someone that they think won't leave...mistake
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:55 am to dupergreenie
quote:
Yeah but implying 'nowhere to go but down' implies that they couldn't just maintain the program.
That’s not what he said. His point was abundantly clear and makes perfect sense. Damn
Posted on 12/5/25 at 10:56 am to Mingo Was His NameO
This entire thread is mental gymnastics LOL.
The "best" coordinator-to-HC candidates this cycle received the following jobs:
Stein: Kentucky
Hartline: USF
Klein: Kansas State
Lupoi: Cal
Not a single one of those is a premier program. And both Klein and Lupoi only got the Kansas State and Cal jobs because they both played and coached there previously (ie: legacy ties).
Now look at the G5 coaches:
Sumrall: Florida
Golesh: Auburn
Morris: Oklahoma State
Silverfield: Arkansas
Chesney: UCLA
This list of jobs is clearly better than the grouping that the coordinators received. And when you look at Chesney and Morris you will see two guys that barely even had much G5 experience at all (2 years and 3 years), which proves that a coach doesn't even need to spend a lot of time at the G5 level before they become viable candidates elsewhere. Silverfield wasn't a "hot" prospect at all (sorry Arky fans) and that guy still ended up getting an SEC head coaching job that is basically on the same level as the job that "hot prospect" Will Stein received (Kentucky).
It is CLEAR that under the new model of CFB with NIL and the Transfer Portal that AD's are prioritizing existing head coaching experience and are simultaneously lowering coordinator candidates, and thus are pushing them to take G5 head coaching positions first. Auburn had the chance to promote Durkin, and they didn't. They chose Golesh over him because of existing HC'ing success, even with Durkin having the advantage of already having skin in the game at Auburn.
Finally: Kirby and Lanning are two outlier cases. Most of the past examples where a sitting coordinator received a HC job at a "top" program without ever being a HC previously involved them being promoted as the inhouse candidate at the school they were already at. For example:
Sherrone Moore to Michigan, Ryan Day to OSU, Lincoln Riley to Oklahoma, etc. Those guys got those jobs because they already had ins and were known products at those programs. They likely would never have received those jobs had they been coordinators elsewhere.
The "best" coordinator-to-HC candidates this cycle received the following jobs:
Stein: Kentucky
Hartline: USF
Klein: Kansas State
Lupoi: Cal
Not a single one of those is a premier program. And both Klein and Lupoi only got the Kansas State and Cal jobs because they both played and coached there previously (ie: legacy ties).
Now look at the G5 coaches:
Sumrall: Florida
Golesh: Auburn
Morris: Oklahoma State
Silverfield: Arkansas
Chesney: UCLA
This list of jobs is clearly better than the grouping that the coordinators received. And when you look at Chesney and Morris you will see two guys that barely even had much G5 experience at all (2 years and 3 years), which proves that a coach doesn't even need to spend a lot of time at the G5 level before they become viable candidates elsewhere. Silverfield wasn't a "hot" prospect at all (sorry Arky fans) and that guy still ended up getting an SEC head coaching job that is basically on the same level as the job that "hot prospect" Will Stein received (Kentucky).
It is CLEAR that under the new model of CFB with NIL and the Transfer Portal that AD's are prioritizing existing head coaching experience and are simultaneously lowering coordinator candidates, and thus are pushing them to take G5 head coaching positions first. Auburn had the chance to promote Durkin, and they didn't. They chose Golesh over him because of existing HC'ing success, even with Durkin having the advantage of already having skin in the game at Auburn.
Finally: Kirby and Lanning are two outlier cases. Most of the past examples where a sitting coordinator received a HC job at a "top" program without ever being a HC previously involved them being promoted as the inhouse candidate at the school they were already at. For example:
Sherrone Moore to Michigan, Ryan Day to OSU, Lincoln Riley to Oklahoma, etc. Those guys got those jobs because they already had ins and were known products at those programs. They likely would never have received those jobs had they been coordinators elsewhere.
Popular
Back to top

0






