- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I have no idea if this a "legitimate" sauce.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:16 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:16 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
"O wants a coordinator that has an innovative scheme but will take input on tempo and protections based on the opponent's defense" "Aranda would be part of that input process. That's the reason Aranda was part of the meeting with O and Canada after Troy."
The more Aranda is involved, the better.
Plus, this gives him some experience with offense and overall decision making, should he ever be in consideration to be our full-time head coach.
I like the idea of an offensive and defensive coordinator somewhat working together in an effort to scheme in the best interest of the overall team.
2
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:23 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I like the idea of an offensive and defensive coordinator somewhat working together in an effort to scheme in the best interest of the overall team
Sure, but if your contribution is to cut out the motion and to play it straight, it's pretty useless.
This thread has turned into some proof that Canada wouldn't listen to Aranda, which is dumb since the OP never said or implied that.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:25 pm to slackster
quote:
Canada wouldn't listen to Aranda, which is dumb since the OP never said or implied that.
I'm not sure your reading correctly. Aranda was definitely part of the equation though and it's no secret there was a rift between Aranda and Canada. I'm pretty damn sure keeping both wasn't as option
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:25 pm to slackster
quote:
Sure, but if your contribution is to cut out the motion and to play it straight, it's pretty useless.
I don't think anyone implied that was Aranda's contribution, though I haven't read the entire thread.
Just that Aranda's input would be provided.
This post was edited on 1/8/18 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:25 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I like the idea of an offensive and defensive coordinator somewhat working together in an effort to scheme in the best interest of the overall team.
I'd prefer it if the HC had a meeting with the coordinators and said ok here's what we need to do on offense and here's what we need to do on defense. Then the the OC and DC run off to their bat caves to do their sorcery. But I'm not sure Orgeron's up to that.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:29 pm to MountainTiger
quote:
I'd prefer it if the HC had a meeting with the coordinators and said ok here's what we need to do on offense and here's what we need to do on defense. Then the the OC and DC run off to their bat caves to do their sorcery. But I'm not sure Orgeron's up to that.
Im pretty sure Aranda defense wouldn't be as successful with a hurry up offense on the other side of the squad. I believe both Aranda and Orgeron prefer more ball control
We saw elements of a hurry up in the first couple of games and a lot of penalties
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Has Aranda ever coached in a place that ran a lot of hurry up?
It might just be a complete unknown to him.
It might just be a complete unknown to him.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:31 pm to 7nette
quote:
The reasoning behind the shifts is to see how the defense will react and try to find the mismatch based off of that information gained. The exact same concept that Dave Aranda tries to do with his packages, creating a mismatch. The difference is Canada's offense is reactionary while Aranda's defense forces the mismatches. They're not just doing it for the hell of it.
This^^^^^^^^
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:32 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Has Aranda ever coached in a place that ran a lot of hurry up?
Wisconsin was ball control, run it downhill
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Wisconsin was ball control, run it downhill
Meant before that. In Utah or wherever he was
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:35 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Green Chili Tiger
All that you said in your OP sounds a hell of a lot more realistic and likely than all the crap that gets read into every little thing around here.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I'm not sure your reading correctly. Aranda was definitely part of the equation though and it's no secret there was a rift between Aranda and Canada. I'm pretty damn sure keeping both wasn't as option
I'm reading just fine. Orgeron wanted to play it straight vs Troy. Canada didn't. We played it Orgeron's way and lost. After that, they had a come to Jesus, and Orgeron backed off.
Oh, and Aranda put in a good word for Canada to get a he job originally. What am I missing?
When did this beef between Canada and Aranda suddenly start?
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:36 pm to Green Chili Tiger
This all makes sense, which makes me prone to believe it. It absolutely makes sense for Aranda to have input in the scheme. I can see Canada getting upset at all the “input” feeling he was being disrespected. I knew there had to be a lack of “team” mentality at the core of the issue.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:37 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
don't think anyone implied that was Aranda's contribution, though I haven't read the entire thread.
Just that Aranda's input would be provided
Yeah, I trust Aranda's input far more than Orgeron's. I'm talking about Orgeron's useless input that cost us the Troy game.
ETA - I may be confused here. Some people are acting like Canada and Aranda wouldn't work together based on the OP. It sounds like you're suggesting Aranda should be involved with the new OC, not that he and Canada had some kind of problem.
This post was edited on 1/8/18 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:39 pm to BayouBengals03
No, but the had Chuck Keaton as QB
They lost to BYU 6-3 that year
They lost to BYU 6-3 that year
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:39 pm to BoogerEater
quote:
And the offense still sucked, what's your point?
How many OC's do you think would've done better with our personnel this year and one offseason to implement it?
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:39 pm to Green Chili Tiger
I tried to tell everyone about Gilbert, but noooooooo! I'm apparently spreading false information.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:41 pm to tjohn deaux
quote:
This all makes sense, which makes me prone to believe it.
Why?
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:41 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
how many more times are you football ignorant morons gonna keep stating this? You realize how stupid this makes you look? you should be ashamed of yourself clown. please get a football education. study film. go to coaches clinics.
It's almost like they think the motions are to tire out the defense before the play starts.
Posted on 1/8/18 at 5:42 pm to slackster
quote:
I'm talking about Orgeron's useless input that cost us the Troy game.
LSU had over 400 yards of offense, but had 4 turnovers. Turnovers and allowing their running back to gain 190 yards cost the game.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News