- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Houston to offer Tom Herman 3.1 million per year
Posted on 11/20/15 at 4:39 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Posted on 11/20/15 at 4:39 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
and thats before we even touch that being the second fiddle in california is infinitely better than being second fiddle in south carolina. the pure notion that south carolina is even close to being as good as a job as UCLA is fricking ridiculous
This post was edited on 11/20/15 at 4:40 pm
0
Posted on 11/20/15 at 4:40 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
So being fourth fiddle most years in the East is better than being second fiddle to USC?
Solid reading comprehensions skills
Posted on 11/20/15 at 4:53 pm to Cockopotamus
You said there are some negatives at UCLA that might make it even with USC. 
Posted on 11/20/15 at 4:58 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
You said there are some negatives at UCLA that might make it even with USC.
Yea. If you had some reading comprehension then you would understand that the negative is being in the same sports market as Southern Cal, the Lakers, Clippers, Kings, Dodgers and potentially a couple NFL teams.
But keep proving me right about how the only thing y'all can say about South Carolina's job not being desirable is "hurrrrr durrrrrrrr South Carolina's football history is shite"
Posted on 11/20/15 at 5:22 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:and that does not make it equal to south carolina
that the negative is being in the same sports market as Southern Cal, the Lakers, Clippers, Kings, Dodgers and potentially a couple NFL teams.
Posted on 11/20/15 at 5:23 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
the negative is being in the same sports market as Southern Cal, the Lakers, Clippers, Kings, Dodgers and potentially a couple NFL teams.
Think about why for a minute doe
Posted on 11/20/15 at 6:16 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
and that does not make it equal to south carolina
Thats not the only downside and I didn't even suggest that they made UCLA equal to South Carolina, just that they made UCLA not a clearly better job.
Regardless, I'm still waiting for someone to regale me with the reasons that UCLA, Cal, Washington, Ole Miss, Baylor and TCU are better jobs.
Only one so far is "hurrrrrrr durrrrrr South Carolina's football history is shite"
This post was edited on 11/20/15 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 11/20/15 at 6:23 pm to Cockopotamus
UH football history >>>>> USCe football history
UH football future with Herman >>>>> USCe football future with Herman
UH football future with Herman >>>>> USCe football future with Herman
Posted on 11/20/15 at 6:27 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:except it is
just that they made UCLA not a clearly better job.
quote:for UCLA? its the fact that they have actually have a history of winning to go with being smack dab in the middle of the most football talent in the country
, I'm still waiting for someone to regale me with the reasons that UCLA
This post was edited on 11/20/15 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 11/21/15 at 7:07 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
didn't even suggest that they made UCLA equal to South Carolina
quote:
UCLA not a clearly better job
So you’re suggesting that SCAR is a better job than UCLA?
quote:
Regardless, I'm still waiting for someone to regale me with the reasons that UCLA, Cal, Washington, Ole Miss, Baylor and TCU are better jobs.
The argument is all semantics. In the current climate, all of the jobs, except maybe Washington, are more desirable programs.
quote:
Baylor and TCU
swim in oil money, situated in the hotbed of recruiting, have great coaches and are building a winning tradition.
quote:
Ole Miss
can be/is becoming a recruiting giant. They play in the best division in football. They have tradition, money, strong alumni base and good facilities.
quote:
Cal
Another product of having a great recruiting base. Academically, they are top notch so they attract the traditional student athlete. Maybe not a better program per se, but Cal is a more desirable situation.
quote:
UCLA
Really?
quote:
Washington
The only plus for UW is location and a pretty good history of football. All things considered, this is the closest program in that group to SCAR.
Posted on 11/21/15 at 7:31 am to Glory, Glory
quote:
Cal is a more desirable situation.
Then why is Sonny Dykes trying to figure out how to get the hell out of Berkeley?
Look, I get it. South Carolina is a shitty program with shitty history and should just promote the groundskeeper to head coach.
Posted on 11/21/15 at 10:14 am to Demarko Murie
I doubt boosters would be on board for ut hiring another conference USA guy. I like him but for ut and their resources everyone is in play
Posted on 11/21/15 at 12:09 pm to UHTiger
You think Herman will really want to walk into a locker room of guys who lost to the Citadel the previous year and take on that rebuild? Houston is a better job than South Carolina going forward
Houston is a better job than South Carolina going forward 
Posted on 11/21/15 at 12:17 pm to Dustin Johnson
Posted on 11/21/15 at 1:02 pm to Dustin Johnson
Do you really think one game the previous year is going to affect a coach's decision on taking a job or not?
Posted on 11/21/15 at 1:06 pm to Cockopotamus
Why is it a better job that those places? It doesn't have the edge in recruiting, money, academics, or history. Basically you are going to say it's a better job because it's in the SEC.
Posted on 11/21/15 at 3:01 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
you would understand that the negative is being in the same sports market as Southern Cal, the Lakers, Clippers, Kings, Dodgers and potentially a couple NFL teams.
Still not enough to make UCLA a job anywhere close to the level of South Carolina. If you win at UCLA you will be top dogs in that city with maybe the exception of the Lakers. Even if you do have to compete with those other teams UCLA has many other things that put it on a whole level above USC.
Posted on 11/21/15 at 6:07 pm to Cockopotamus
oh yes, yes, yes... please take Herman. he just lost to a 5-5 UConn team.
Posted on 11/21/15 at 6:08 pm to ladyluckUGA
Obviously a terrible coach now
Posted on 11/21/15 at 6:15 pm to ladyluckUGA
one loss at Houston and he's now a bad coach. What an idiot.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News