- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fired Coaches should not get a free ride..........
Posted on 12/28/07 at 7:30 pm to Macavity92
Posted on 12/28/07 at 7:30 pm to Macavity92
quote:
Most of these guys do not have the academic requirements to teach.
They don't have to teach. They can be janitors......
quote:
Students should not be required to pay back scholarships. That is absurd.
Not really. How many waste that. They should be required to pay it back if they don't finish.
Posted on 12/28/07 at 9:35 pm to Bobby Moore
I may have missed part of the argument, but why should a player have to pay back a scholoarship for years he was actually at the university? Unless I am mistaken, a scholarship has to be renewed every year so they aren't getting the money for all four years when they only stay three.
Posted on 12/28/07 at 11:29 pm to Fububutsy
quote:
I may have missed part of the argument, but why should a player have to pay back a scholoarship for years he was actually at the university?
They can't tell you. Fortunately, this lame idea will never be implemented.
Posted on 12/29/07 at 2:52 am to Bobby Moore
quote:
When a University fires a Coach and then pays him for a number of years, he should be required to stay at that University and do some other job. They should be required to EARN the money and not just get a free salary. It would not have to be attached to the sport, but they could teach or something to earn this money.
Nolan Richardson got $40,000 a month for several years after leaving Arkansas. Why? He and other coaches should be required to stay and work for that money. Why should Ole Miss pay Coach O $200,000 a year and him not do nothing?
Players that leave early to the NFL or NBA and not stay and graduate should be required to pay back their scholarship.
Bobby, When a coach is fired, what has happened from a legal standpoint, if I understand correctly, is that the school has, in effect, violated the contract with the coach. The coach has no obligation to the school. He didn't violate the contract. Also, generally if a school has fired a coach, the LAST thing the school wants is the coach hangin' around. Paying the coach for the term of the contract fulfills the school's contractual obligation. Conversly, if the coach leaves to move to another school/coaching job, he probably, depending on the terms of the contract has to pay the school a buyout because HE is violating the contract.
Regarding students leaving early...remember the scholorships are for one year with the option to be renewed for the next year. A school can, at any time decide to take the player's scholarship away...for no better reason that the kid turns out to not be as good a player as the school origially thought...and yes, that does happen sometimes. Also, the players are not slaves. They cannot be forced to stay in school if they choose to pursue thier choosen prfession...even if that choosen profession is professional football, basketball, baseball, etc. The school had the student athlete's services on the fieled/court for the length of time he was in school, and when he leaves the school has no further financial obligation to the former student athlete.
Posted on 12/29/07 at 10:32 am to jbs780
isnt getting some of these kids, some of yall call them "street thugs" some type of education and forcing them to get there high school diploma and some college better then nothing???????
also if you look at it many players who dont make it in the pros end up going back to school or end up with a decent job where they are able to support themselves and their families. Isnt that the point of college to begin with? Make them contributing members of society.
making them pay back a scholarship is retarted. they fall under the same rules as somebody that gets an academic scholarship. if they fail out they can lose their scholarship, they dont have to repay it. What if a academic scholarship recipient transfers schools after 2 years, should they have to repay the money to lsu?
also the coaches things is the most retarded thing ever. yea im sure we really want smoke here working for us. its called a severance package. its in the contract and its what it takes to get these big time coaches.
also if you look at it many players who dont make it in the pros end up going back to school or end up with a decent job where they are able to support themselves and their families. Isnt that the point of college to begin with? Make them contributing members of society.
making them pay back a scholarship is retarted. they fall under the same rules as somebody that gets an academic scholarship. if they fail out they can lose their scholarship, they dont have to repay it. What if a academic scholarship recipient transfers schools after 2 years, should they have to repay the money to lsu?
also the coaches things is the most retarded thing ever. yea im sure we really want smoke here working for us. its called a severance package. its in the contract and its what it takes to get these big time coaches.
Posted on 12/29/07 at 12:30 pm to Bobby Moore
You really don't understand contract law at all, do you?
And how is it hurting you exactly if scholarship students leave school before graduation?
And how is it hurting you exactly if scholarship students leave school before graduation?
Posted on 12/29/07 at 6:11 pm to Bobby Moore
With both players and coaches there is a great deal of economic risk in committing to a program.
The coaches generally do not get a free ride. Until recently coaching was much less lucrative and less stable than now. Except for the elite, not much has changed. They take many professional risks with many costs when they go to a program, especially the assistants. Only head coaches had contracts. Now some assistants are getting contracts at major programs--Nebraska and Michigan for example. Those assistants who stay at Nebraska will earn their pay by recruiting according to Osborne. Those not retained will be paid through January 2009. If they take other employment the contract payout will be reduced accordingly. That is fairly common in most employment contracts. Few coaches will sit out long. Competition for coaching positions at colleges is more fierce than liberal arts teaching positions at those same schools. A fired coach may not get a job right away and will almost certainly have to move to take a new job. He may be coming from a team that did not do well or is under the cloud of investigation.
I think schools and their financial backers should look at these contracts and salaries and make sure that they are in the best interests of the institution. Look at WVU suing Rodriguez for his move to Michigan and the irrationally long deal given Weis at Notre Dame. I think there should be less guaranteed money and more incentive pay based on wins-losses, graduation rates, compliance with rules, and other performance measures that affect the football program. The coaches seem to have good agents taking advantage of the "irrational exuberance" in the coaching market. At some point the bubble will burst. Until that happens the institutions should take a more business like approach. One can compare this to the market for executive talent in business or star power in movies. The results often do not justify the costs or meet expectations.
Regarding scholarships, another poster pointed out correctly that there is no guarantee. Scholarships now are one-year and renewable. Between NCAA limits and IRS rules on taxable income, there is a real squeeze on players to gain and maintain athletic scholarships. The institution gets a lot from the player with no commitment to the player for longevity. Until Vietnam, it was quite normal for people to drop out of college to take a good job. Now it is for athletes and computer geniuses. I favor education and graduation, but it is a cost-benefit analysis. Many players have returned to finish school--Shaq for example, and they will do so for a variety of reasons.
The coaches generally do not get a free ride. Until recently coaching was much less lucrative and less stable than now. Except for the elite, not much has changed. They take many professional risks with many costs when they go to a program, especially the assistants. Only head coaches had contracts. Now some assistants are getting contracts at major programs--Nebraska and Michigan for example. Those assistants who stay at Nebraska will earn their pay by recruiting according to Osborne. Those not retained will be paid through January 2009. If they take other employment the contract payout will be reduced accordingly. That is fairly common in most employment contracts. Few coaches will sit out long. Competition for coaching positions at colleges is more fierce than liberal arts teaching positions at those same schools. A fired coach may not get a job right away and will almost certainly have to move to take a new job. He may be coming from a team that did not do well or is under the cloud of investigation.
I think schools and their financial backers should look at these contracts and salaries and make sure that they are in the best interests of the institution. Look at WVU suing Rodriguez for his move to Michigan and the irrationally long deal given Weis at Notre Dame. I think there should be less guaranteed money and more incentive pay based on wins-losses, graduation rates, compliance with rules, and other performance measures that affect the football program. The coaches seem to have good agents taking advantage of the "irrational exuberance" in the coaching market. At some point the bubble will burst. Until that happens the institutions should take a more business like approach. One can compare this to the market for executive talent in business or star power in movies. The results often do not justify the costs or meet expectations.
Regarding scholarships, another poster pointed out correctly that there is no guarantee. Scholarships now are one-year and renewable. Between NCAA limits and IRS rules on taxable income, there is a real squeeze on players to gain and maintain athletic scholarships. The institution gets a lot from the player with no commitment to the player for longevity. Until Vietnam, it was quite normal for people to drop out of college to take a good job. Now it is for athletes and computer geniuses. I favor education and graduation, but it is a cost-benefit analysis. Many players have returned to finish school--Shaq for example, and they will do so for a variety of reasons.
Posted on 12/29/07 at 6:24 pm to jbs780
quote:
When a coach is fired, what has happened from a legal standpoint, if I understand correctly, is that the school has, in effect, violated the contract with the coach. The coach has no obligation to the school. He didn't violate the contract.
A firing is not a violation necessarily. Most contracts that are reasonably well-drafted have termination provisions. The breach or violation may occur if the termination provisions are not followed.
Posted on 12/29/07 at 10:22 pm to Bobby Moore
I hope you're not in the running to be our next AD
Posted on 12/29/07 at 10:47 pm to Bobby Moore
quote:
When a University fires a Coach and then pays him for a number of years, he should be required to stay at that University and do some other job. They should be required to EARN the money and not just get a free salary. It would not have to be attached to the sport, but they could teach or something to earn this money.
Nolan Richardson got $40,000 a month for several years after leaving Arkansas. Why? He and other coaches should be required to stay and work for that money. Why should Ole Miss pay Coach O $200,000 a year and him not do nothing?
Players that leave early to the NFL or NBA and not stay and graduate should be required to pay back their scholarship.
It's in the contract that is negotiated by both parties. Every other element of the contract (compensation, term, etc.) is made with knowledge of this fact.
I'm sure coaches would be willing to allow schools to fire with no compensation as long as they are compensated accordingly for losing the guaranteed money.
This post was edited on 12/29/07 at 10:50 pm
Posted on 12/29/07 at 10:55 pm to Bobby Moore
quote:
When a University fires a Coach and then pays him for a number of years, he should be required to stay at that University and do some other job. They should be required to EARN the money and not just get a free salary.
Right.... because once they have been fired, they have soooooo much motivation to do a good job for that school
I nominate your post for stupid post of the year.
Posted on 12/30/07 at 12:53 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
Right.... because once they have been fired, they have soooooo much motivation to do a good job for that school
It does not matter whether they do a good job or not, they could EARN their future salary by doing something....even be a nightwatchman.........
[quote]I nominate your post for stupid post of the year.
Thanx.......
Posted on 12/30/07 at 12:54 pm to Lithium
quote:
Fired Coaches should not get a free ride..........
I hope you're not in the running to be our next AD
and you think they should get a free ride.....dumb....
Posted on 12/30/07 at 6:57 pm to Bobby Moore
quote:
Fired Coaches should not get a free ride..........
I hope you're not in the running to be our next AD
and you think they should get a free ride.....dumb....
The are not getting a free ride Bobby. The are being compensated for having thier contract broken. Contract law! You ever had a legal contract with someone, and had the thing broken? Bet you wanted to be compensated...like anyone would.
Posted on 12/31/07 at 1:15 am to Bobby Moore
quote:
Players that leave early to the NFL or NBA and not stay and graduate should be required to pay back their scholarship.
That's so dumb I won't even comment on it, lol.
quote:
When a University fires a Coach and then pays him for a number of years, he should be required to stay at that University and do some other job
First off, they signed a CONTRACT and the terms of termination are either stated in the contract or agreed upon termination.
Second, using your logic, shouldn't universities NOT be able to fire coaches at all?
Posted on 12/31/07 at 5:30 am to shel311
quote:
Players that leave early to the NFL or NBA and not stay and graduate should be required to pay back their scholarship.
That's so dumb I won't even comment on it, lol.
but you did....lamb and dumb.....
quote:
using your logic, shouldn't universities NOT be able to fire coaches at all?
not be able to fire.......does that mean they can't or can.......NOT!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 12/31/07 at 5:32 am to jbs780
quote:
The are not getting a free ride Bobby. The are being compensated for having thier contract broken. Contract law! You ever had a legal contract with someone, and had the thing broken? Bet you wanted to be compensated...like anyone would.
Thanks. This and a lot more good answers here explain what I was looking for. I don't pretend to know everything like some arseholes on the rant do, but I do have the balls to post and accept their stupid remarks to learn more.
Popular
Back to top

2







