- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bruce Feldman Reporting
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:31 pm to Macintosh504
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:31 pm to Macintosh504
quote:
Imagine Kelly loses denbrock but keeps house
This is looking like a legitimate possibility.
0
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:35 pm to 1999
Haha that is fricking great LSU. Way to frick that up.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:43 pm to Kramerica Industries
Feldman is a retard. He just got a major pay bump here
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:47 pm to CBP3110
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:55 pm to KaizenLSU
His contract will get approved. I can’t recall a time when we ever had one not approved.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:56 pm to Big4SALTbro
It’s not about it getting approved, it’s the time it is taking to get it done. If he negotiates a new deal with Notre Dame while he has a low buyout and before signing with LSU he is basically gone.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:00 pm to Big4SALTbro
he will be gone well before february though. LSU must have thought they were in the clear after holding off aggy.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:02 pm to KaizenLSU
ND would have to pay him what we are going to.
If we agreed to a deal on Dec 6th probably practically no way to get that approved officially by the board two days later. I’m sure ND works the same way. The BOS meetings happen on a schedule.
FWIW losing Denbrock before firing house would cause a lot of lost faith in BK, not that it matters since Scott is such a clown with contracts.
If we agreed to a deal on Dec 6th probably practically no way to get that approved officially by the board two days later. I’m sure ND works the same way. The BOS meetings happen on a schedule.
FWIW losing Denbrock before firing house would cause a lot of lost faith in BK, not that it matters since Scott is such a clown with contracts.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:16 pm to GeauxHouston
quote:
Okay then we promote Sloan. Not the end of the world.
Sloan has done very well. He's been outstanding with JD's development and is #6 in CFB recruiting.
He had some co-OC and OC experience at LA Tech, but only a few years. We definitely need to do whatever it takes to keep him, but OC would be risky with his limited experience.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:28 pm to KaizenLSU
That’s who I meant fricked it up
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:28 pm to 1999
False, it was agreed to in principle on the 6th, believe it or not a day and a half is not enough time to have everything drawn up for the BOS meeting on the 8th.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:29 pm to Big4SALTbro
Of course it will but by that time it won’t mean shite if he leaves before. He has zero buyout right now right? Since he hasn’t signed anything?
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:30 pm to Big4SALTbro
Are they going to have to pay what we paid? If his family wants to go back there then I bet he would take a pay cut if it’s close to the amount we offered.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:31 pm to BayouCowboy
Exactly he’s not ready to be an OC, plus losing Denbrock what does that do to Underwood.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:37 pm to Kramerica Industries
This may secretly be great for us. Before JD started balling out I had serious issues with Denbrock.
In my mind Denbrock has never proven anything here yet except for JD being so mobile and learning a great deep ball.
In my mind Denbrock has never proven anything here yet except for JD being so mobile and learning a great deep ball.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:38 pm to 1999
quote:
Matt Moscona
@MattMoscona
Mike Denbrock and LSU agreed on a contract extension Dec. 6. All contracts must be approved by the BOS, which met two days later, Dec. 8. Denbrock's deal, however, was not on the agenda. The next LSU BOS meeting is Feb 23 when, presumably, the extension would be approved.
Oh I would MELT melt if this happens.
Not a lawyer, but does it mean nothing that LSU and Denbrock agreed to a contract even though the BOS can't approve it yet? Is that not binding at all? If not, what's to stop schools/coordinators from shopping around after a verbal agreement to a contract extension now that all the cards are on the table?
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:49 pm to CBP3110
quote:
Exactly he’s not ready to be an OC, plus losing Denbrock what does that do to Underwood.
Sloan is his primary. Listen to Nuss talk about Sloan. He can't stop praising him for helping him develop. Losing Denbrock probably wouldn't effect Underwood. Losing Sloan might.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:50 pm to Kramerica Industries
It’s got the legs of Jerry’s Kids.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:54 pm to CBP3110
quote:
Exactly he’s not ready to be an OC
Sure he is. If we don't make him one soon, somebody else will.
quote:
plus losing Denbrock what does that do to Underwood.
I'd be very surprised if Underwood doesn't have a much better relationship with Sloan than Denbrock. Sloan leaving would probably jeopardize getting Underwood more than Denbrock.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News