Started By
Message

re: 75 million? I prefer O

Posted on 12/2/17 at 7:59 am to
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
22560 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 7:59 am to
Agree!!
Posted by GeauxEaux
Member since Dec 2016
719 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 9:59 am to
It’s just as likely O wins as it is Jimbo wins. Just research Jimbo and you find he fell into his so no reason to believe he can find it on his own.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Few coaches could have turned this season around after the Troy loss








How about few coaches could have led LSU to a loss vs Troy???
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
22135 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Jimbo will have to go through Saban, Gus and Orgeron.



One of these is not like the other
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
17895 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Just research Jimbo and you find he fell into his so no reason to believe he can find it on his own.

Fell into what? A national championship? What on earth are you talking about?
Posted by blzr
Saratoga
Member since Mar 2011
30744 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 12:23 pm to
Lol no one prefers O. You sound poor as frick
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33964 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

GeauxEaux
Member since Dec 2016
61 posts


YA suspect
This post was edited on 12/2/17 at 12:36 pm
Posted by doya2
Charenton
Member since Jan 2005
8893 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 12:43 pm to
75 mill is a drop in the bucket for the Aggies. So what if they paid him 100 mill? It's their money! They hired a good coach. Quit bitchng about the money.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46671 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

that doesn’t mean he’s better than Orgeron.




quote:

I believe he’s every bit as good as Fisher


This post was edited on 12/2/17 at 12:47 pm
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9552 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 1:56 pm to
Solid point, this hire was not impressive to the alumni base. It was aimed at a less sophisticated segement of the fan base. I have yet to meet an actual knowledgeable alumni that was excited about this hire or truly excited about the future under O.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116459 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 2:06 pm to
Derek go frick your self
Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9095 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 2:12 pm to
Jimbo’s deal isn’t even that much per year compared to the market. In 3-4 years it will look even more economical.

If he wins we will increase it, and if he don’t we will buy him out. Don’t worry about it y’all.
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14794 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 2:29 pm to
Jimbo is a consistent 9 win a year coach in the ACC. He will have an occasional outlier, but he is nothing more than that. Translates into about 8 wins a year consistently in SEC.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33964 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Jimbo’s deal isn’t even that much per year compared to the market. In 3-4 years it will look even more economical.



No use trying to explain this.

Much better idea to get a coach that no one wants, doesn't do anything, is cheap and can be easily fired.

Why we would want someone like that, I have no idea, but here we are.

I don't know why we think we can laugh at anyone. All this past year has done is make LSU look cheap and not committed to winning.
This post was edited on 12/2/17 at 3:58 pm
Posted by proger
Member since Nov 2007
750 posts
Posted on 12/2/17 at 5:42 pm to
Hey Derek, I guess you think the concessions were outstanding this year too, eh?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram