StripedPaws

Stats most certainly do not tell the whole story but most in TR seem to think so...if wait, that's only if it favors their guy.

Stats would be so much interesting if they included errors like in baseball. Receivers may not look as good as we think. ??

quote:

---

So, we’re gonna start a guy that could not beat out our previous shitty quarterbacks and everybody is hunky dory with that? The mental gymnastics you people are doing trying to say this guy is gonna do good is really hilarious.

---

None of the 3 current QBs "beat out our previous shitty quarterbacks" last year but one is gonna have to play. So what's exactly your point?

quote:

---

Brennan will be the starter and he will progress nicely, like all top QBs do. Growing pains, yes...but when the light goes on and stays on, we will have one of the best to ever play here. Just jumping around and begging for some miracle to occur without experience is a moronic approach.

---

Is he a top QB bc he was a 4 Star? So was LN. Why is it growing pains for MB, but can't possibly be growing pains for the other two. Maybe JM's growing pains have ended. Yes, he was a 3 Star, but a 3 Star who won 2 state titles in the highest Texas classification, consistently against D1 level talent like Jamal Adams, Toby Weatherby, Ed Paris and Ed Ingram, to name a few.

quote:

---

JM can play. The rant does not want to hear it. That said, its bullshite. QB job was decided last year. T-h-e-r-e i-s N-O C-o-m-p-e-t-i-t-i-o-n.

---

This post is the TRUTH! Anyone who thinks there is an actual QB competition is just delusional. MB was GIVEN the #2 spot last year in anticipation for the #1 slot this year...HOWEVER...that does not necessarily make him suitable for the starting position. All 3 QBs played spread offenses in HS, so until the offense fits the talent, it's all pointless.

quote:

---

baw, have you looked at our receiving corps in the league right meow?

---

What is your point WinnPtiger?

Please explain @rickyh. That reply was hilarious.

quote:

---

I don’t have to twist anything to fit an agenda The facts fit the agenda quite well. You could almost say the facts dictate the agenda

---

Who really knows what the real facts are when the narrative is CLEARLY being controlled.

This thred went completely off the rails from the original post...too funny

I think a BALANCED offense would be more beneficial. Continuing to use the RBs, but don't live and die by them, continue to use the TE from time to time but not enough for a team to know the play when 84 is in the game, and start using more than one WR on just a 9 route.

Completely agree TigerLunatik. I just want to talk about something OTHER THAN QBs. For some reason, EVERY YEAR, the conversation is the right QB when it's ALWAYS MORE!