- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Thoughts on security system that saves video to DVR vs the cloud
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:28 am
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:28 am
I know all about the Ring doorbell, and how it saves recorded video to the cloud. There is no hardware to deal with...but your data is "less secure".
Meanwhile, I have friends who have camera systems at their house that save the video to a DVR that sits in a closet in their house...which is connected to the internet and allows them access to the video. Obvious this is an extra piece of hardware that could go bad.
What is the general consensus about cloud based security video vs DVR based security video?
I like the simplicity of the Ring set up but I hate their ugly cameras...I prefer the doom style...so that has me exploring options.
Thanks in advance.
Meanwhile, I have friends who have camera systems at their house that save the video to a DVR that sits in a closet in their house...which is connected to the internet and allows them access to the video. Obvious this is an extra piece of hardware that could go bad.
What is the general consensus about cloud based security video vs DVR based security video?
I like the simplicity of the Ring set up but I hate their ugly cameras...I prefer the doom style...so that has me exploring options.
Thanks in advance.
Posted on 4/30/21 at 10:31 am to Chicken
i think costco sells some bundles but kork, tigerwise, and VAbuckeye are your spirit animals here.
eta i went from diy to ring because at the time foscam was a dumpster fire and you had to practically learn how to code to get it working...for 10 minutes until it broke again.
i am sure there are much easier solutions now.
eta i went from diy to ring because at the time foscam was a dumpster fire and you had to practically learn how to code to get it working...for 10 minutes until it broke again.
i am sure there are much easier solutions now.
This post was edited on 4/30/21 at 10:32 am
Posted on 4/30/21 at 11:28 am to Chicken
I had a position at LSU during grad school where part of my responsibility was managing the DVRs. I would strongly suggest not going the DVR route. Our equipment broke all of the time, the drives would not last long, even the surveillance grade drives, though I believe they have gotten a lot better.
Though I have not done it, if I wasn't going Ring/dropcam the avenue I would explore would be setting up a VMS on Azure, connecting your IP cams to that and archiving your footage there under your own security configurations as opposed.
Chicken you have more to be concerned about than me, but I would still go with the service companies. It's easier, and I don't think any one with the technical sophistication needed to get into that data would be targeting me.
Though I have not done it, if I wasn't going Ring/dropcam the avenue I would explore would be setting up a VMS on Azure, connecting your IP cams to that and archiving your footage there under your own security configurations as opposed.
Chicken you have more to be concerned about than me, but I would still go with the service companies. It's easier, and I don't think any one with the technical sophistication needed to get into that data would be targeting me.
Posted on 4/30/21 at 11:44 am to Chicken
For real security always get hard-wired PoE cameras with DVR for local storage. As you mentioned, this makes your data more secure as in your data belongs to you, but also it is less secure because as you also mentioned the hardware could go bad or be stolen. You can mitigate some of the risk by choosing a DVR that can take more than one hard drive. This duplicates your data to protect against hard drive failure, though obviously it will cost more. And you can hide or otherwise physically secure the device.
Some of the advantages of hard-wired cameras with local storage:
Full resolution recording 24/7 with no fees. Most of the cloud cams with free storage only record on motion, the length of clips is limited, and some even have a "cooldown" period between events. They miss a lot. Full time recording to the cloud costs a lot.
Wifi is finicky. It is subject to interference which can reduce speeds or drop the connection altogether, which obviously impacts video quality.
If your internet connection goes down, you're still recording.
If you scale up to 4/6/8/10 cameras, it requires a LOT of bandwidth, so much that many home internet plans just can't upload it all with full time recording. For reference, standard HD video can burn through 1GB or more per hour per camera. With only 4 cameras many people will hit their 1TB monthly cap in around a week. It could also completely saturate the total upload capacity for many users, which means video just won't get saved. 4K cameras makes it several times worse. You need gigabit upload and uncapped internet for cloud cams to match the capacity of local storage, and your ISP needs to maintain the speed through high use periods.
You can record through power outages by adding a UPS to power your router and NVR, which will in turn power your cameras. This will also give you surge protection.
You can get all the same features like person/vehicle detection, notifications, two-way talk, etc. Many vendors even have doorbell cameras that integrate with the NVR just like any other camera.
Get some quotes from local security and/or low voltage wiring companies.
Some of the advantages of hard-wired cameras with local storage:
Full resolution recording 24/7 with no fees. Most of the cloud cams with free storage only record on motion, the length of clips is limited, and some even have a "cooldown" period between events. They miss a lot. Full time recording to the cloud costs a lot.
Wifi is finicky. It is subject to interference which can reduce speeds or drop the connection altogether, which obviously impacts video quality.
If your internet connection goes down, you're still recording.
If you scale up to 4/6/8/10 cameras, it requires a LOT of bandwidth, so much that many home internet plans just can't upload it all with full time recording. For reference, standard HD video can burn through 1GB or more per hour per camera. With only 4 cameras many people will hit their 1TB monthly cap in around a week. It could also completely saturate the total upload capacity for many users, which means video just won't get saved. 4K cameras makes it several times worse. You need gigabit upload and uncapped internet for cloud cams to match the capacity of local storage, and your ISP needs to maintain the speed through high use periods.
You can record through power outages by adding a UPS to power your router and NVR, which will in turn power your cameras. This will also give you surge protection.
You can get all the same features like person/vehicle detection, notifications, two-way talk, etc. Many vendors even have doorbell cameras that integrate with the NVR just like any other camera.
Get some quotes from local security and/or low voltage wiring companies.
Posted on 4/30/21 at 12:12 pm to Stuckinthe90s
quote:
I had a position at LSU during grad school where part of my responsibility was managing the DVRs. I would strongly suggest not going the DVR route. Our equipment broke all of the time, the drives would not last long, even the surveillance grade drives, though I believe they have gotten a lot better.
quote:
Stuckinthe90s
I kid.
Yeah any drive can fail at any time, but modern surveillance drives are really good. Generally if they last a month they're going to run for years.
quote:No offense, but this sounds really terrible. This is building your own cloud video service, so it has all the downsides of that, and in addition it requires a lot of technical knowledge and it will cost 10X more. The video storage alone would cost something like $18/mth per terabyte, and that's not including the cost to run the VM. Then what video recording/management software are we using? Mobile app? How do we handle push notifications? Motion/person detection?
I would explore would be setting up a VMS on Azure, connecting your IP cams to that and archiving your footage there under your own security configurations as opposed.
I love reinventing the wheel unnecessarily, and even I wouldn't think about doing this. Sounds like way more to manage and fix than just swapping out an $80 hard drive every 5-10 years. Hell I could keep a whole second NVR on standby for less than the cost of 1 year of Azure, and in the meantime I would get better quality video, longer retention, and everything would just work.
Posted on 4/30/21 at 12:41 pm to Chicken
I have hardwired cameras and DVR at home. It works well and is reliable but the app isn't as snazzy as the modern wireless stuff offers.
Posted on 4/30/21 at 3:00 pm to Chicken
quote:
What is the general consensus about cloud based security video vs DVR based security video?
It really depends on your risk profile. If I had a lot to lose, like I owned a valuable website, or even if I had valuable information, such as access to the real identity of potentially powerful people that made posts anonymously they'd never make publicly on my valuable website, I'd probably need to worry about security and should keep the internal camera footage of how my neighbor pays me back for borrowing toilet paper on a local DVR so it's not used against me as leverage.
Just sayin.
Popular
Back to top
5









