- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

T mobile 5g is suppose to be the best out there--going to try for 30 days-has anyone else?
Posted on 1/30/21 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 1/30/21 at 6:04 pm
I have been with ATT since 1986 and BellSouth Mobility days but I read their 5g is nothing special but T's is a major step up. I called T tonight and signed up. I can cancel anytime within 30 days and return the phone.
Has anyone done this with T? Any hang ups dealing with them other than being a cell company?
Has anyone done this with T? Any hang ups dealing with them other than being a cell company?
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:12 pm to JDGTiger
Works fine for me. No dead spots, no dropped calls, plenty fast enough. Any sad spots that were around are now full bar LTE. The rest is 5G.
In and around NOLA
In and around NOLA
Posted on 1/30/21 at 8:59 pm to JDGTiger
5G full service everywhere around me and I'm fairly rural Missouri. TMO 5G is nutty.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 12:23 am to JDGTiger
It's time to lower your expectations on "5G". Tech writers irresponsibly hyped up "5G" without understanding what it is. To this day, they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about when they pump out articles/videos. We've been sold "up to Gigabit speeds" and "new mmWave bands" by these amateur idiots. This has led to many people scratching their heads whenever their phones are peaking at 20-30 Mbps on 5G.
Let me explain;
In order to get the speeds that every idiot tech writer has been writing about, carriers will need massive amounts of contiguous spectrum (blocks of 100 MHz of spectrum). Unfortunately, carriers won't find this in existing FDD spectrum they own (Bands 2, 4, 12, 66, etc). To get massive blocks of contiguous spectrum, carriers had to go looking for it in the 28 GHz and 39 GHz bands.
Success? Not quite.
Anyone who took HS physics would know that higher frequencies don't travel/penetrate as far as lower frequencies. This means that these amazing speeds we've been promised will only be found in certain neighborhoods, parks, convention centers, and stadiums (think of ranges similar to that of WiFi routers). AT&T and Verizon are practically screwed at the moment until the FCC auctions off spectrum in the 3.5 - 3.8 GHz area. In the meantime, in order to be able to claim "nationwide coverage", they have had to repurpose or share existing LTE spectrum with 5G NR (AT&T killed 3G/LTE on the 850 MHz band for n5 while Verizon is using DSS to simultaneously broadcast LTE and NR on the PCS and AWS bands). This is why 5G isn't setting speed records at the moment.
Now there's a reason why I didn't mention T-Mobile. They are the only carrier that currently has the spectrum to offer wide coverage with faster speeds. Clearwire (which was bought by Sprint, which was bought by T-Mobile) owned a lot of EBS/BRS licenses. They owned an average of 160 MHz of bandwidth in the 2.5 - 2.6 GHz band in most markets. While T-Mobile is moving extremely fast in deploying n41 in places such as Houston and Dallas, don't expect to find it everywhere just yet. It'll take time (there was a shortage of equipment a while back).
TL;DR version. Lower your expectations. T-Mobile will likely have the best 5G network in a few years. Today, everyone sucks unless you find their rare mmWave towers that can't penetrate a wet paper towel.
Let me explain;
In order to get the speeds that every idiot tech writer has been writing about, carriers will need massive amounts of contiguous spectrum (blocks of 100 MHz of spectrum). Unfortunately, carriers won't find this in existing FDD spectrum they own (Bands 2, 4, 12, 66, etc). To get massive blocks of contiguous spectrum, carriers had to go looking for it in the 28 GHz and 39 GHz bands.
Success? Not quite.
Anyone who took HS physics would know that higher frequencies don't travel/penetrate as far as lower frequencies. This means that these amazing speeds we've been promised will only be found in certain neighborhoods, parks, convention centers, and stadiums (think of ranges similar to that of WiFi routers). AT&T and Verizon are practically screwed at the moment until the FCC auctions off spectrum in the 3.5 - 3.8 GHz area. In the meantime, in order to be able to claim "nationwide coverage", they have had to repurpose or share existing LTE spectrum with 5G NR (AT&T killed 3G/LTE on the 850 MHz band for n5 while Verizon is using DSS to simultaneously broadcast LTE and NR on the PCS and AWS bands). This is why 5G isn't setting speed records at the moment.
Now there's a reason why I didn't mention T-Mobile. They are the only carrier that currently has the spectrum to offer wide coverage with faster speeds. Clearwire (which was bought by Sprint, which was bought by T-Mobile) owned a lot of EBS/BRS licenses. They owned an average of 160 MHz of bandwidth in the 2.5 - 2.6 GHz band in most markets. While T-Mobile is moving extremely fast in deploying n41 in places such as Houston and Dallas, don't expect to find it everywhere just yet. It'll take time (there was a shortage of equipment a while back).
TL;DR version. Lower your expectations. T-Mobile will likely have the best 5G network in a few years. Today, everyone sucks unless you find their rare mmWave towers that can't penetrate a wet paper towel.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 7:32 am to Texas Weazel
quote:this is also why they need more towers. the towers need to be closer together but they obviously aren't willing to invest the money. There's no money to gain.
Anyone who took HS physics would know that higher frequencies don't travel/penetrate as far as lower frequencies.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:30 am to arcalades
They would have to put a massive amount of towers to get mmWave in every single american neighborhood. The cost of doing this would be astronomical and not feasible for mobile users.
What Verizon is building today is their WISP foundation for tomorrow. mmWave will not be as widespread as people think it will be for mobile users. Small cellphones can't get more than a block of outdoor coverage from mmW small cells. It's bad enough that you can't even get it inside buildings that sit right next to the node.
But sticking directional outdoor antennas for 5G home internet? That's a whole other ballgame and the likely end game for Verizon. Fixed UEs will overcome some of the disadvantages seen on mobile UEs with mmW. For now, Verizon marketing is more than happy to use mmWave as a "proof of concept" for 5G.
Also, at some point Verizon will piss off enough people and have their small cell build out halted. There are similar stories like the one above all over the country. The FCC will eventually fold and shut this down IMO.
What Verizon is building today is their WISP foundation for tomorrow. mmWave will not be as widespread as people think it will be for mobile users. Small cellphones can't get more than a block of outdoor coverage from mmW small cells. It's bad enough that you can't even get it inside buildings that sit right next to the node.
But sticking directional outdoor antennas for 5G home internet? That's a whole other ballgame and the likely end game for Verizon. Fixed UEs will overcome some of the disadvantages seen on mobile UEs with mmW. For now, Verizon marketing is more than happy to use mmWave as a "proof of concept" for 5G.
Also, at some point Verizon will piss off enough people and have their small cell build out halted. There are similar stories like the one above all over the country. The FCC will eventually fold and shut this down IMO.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:46 am to Texas Weazel
quote:You seem pretty knowledgeable about radio. Do you think Starlink will be able to scale? What are the logistics of blanketing the globe with high speed wireless coverage? As an example, if they were to service a city of ~100k, would they try to put a dish at every residence, or would they link the sats to ground relay stations to basically be the backbone for local WISPs, or something else?
Texas Weazel
Posted on 1/31/21 at 12:41 pm to Texas Weazel
I have T-Mobile and 5G in New Orleans with iPhone 12 Pro Max and i literally can tell no difference in my day to day activities. It loads ESPN website and normal stuff just as fast/slow as 4g LTE.
I’m sure it’s faster on paper but for most folks, they wont be able to tell a difference in my opinion.
I’m sure it’s faster on paper but for most folks, they wont be able to tell a difference in my opinion.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 12:32 pm to DoubleDown
Thanks everybody.
I am actually want to see if T mobile is better in a rural area I frequent. They show 5g there on their coverage map.
I get the phone tomorrow and will give a report if anyone is interested.
I am actually want to see if T mobile is better in a rural area I frequent. They show 5g there on their coverage map.
I get the phone tomorrow and will give a report if anyone is interested.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 2:59 pm to Korkstand
I'm not sure about starlink. Logistics wise, it's a different beast than wireless.
I don't think their goal is to connect entire cities with 100k+ populations. They'll definitely have their work cut out to make sure that congestion doesn't creep up on their network.
Having said that, there was some talk about wireless carriers using these low orbiting satellites for backhaul. Laying fiber is expensive and microwave backhaul isn't always feasible due to terrain and other factors. I know T-Mobile and Verizon have used satellite backhaul in the past in new rural sites and during hurricane recovery efforts. T-Mobile added new coverage along I-25 in Wyoming using satellite backhaul. Latency was awful, but it got the job done. With starlink's lower latency, it should be a game changer for business customers who work in rural part of the world.
I don't think their goal is to connect entire cities with 100k+ populations. They'll definitely have their work cut out to make sure that congestion doesn't creep up on their network.
Having said that, there was some talk about wireless carriers using these low orbiting satellites for backhaul. Laying fiber is expensive and microwave backhaul isn't always feasible due to terrain and other factors. I know T-Mobile and Verizon have used satellite backhaul in the past in new rural sites and during hurricane recovery efforts. T-Mobile added new coverage along I-25 in Wyoming using satellite backhaul. Latency was awful, but it got the job done. With starlink's lower latency, it should be a game changer for business customers who work in rural part of the world.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 3:01 pm to DoubleDown
I believe T-Mobile has only deployes 10x10 MHz of 5G NR in the 600 MHz band (n71). That's not going to give you better speeds (especially in SA mode).
But what n71 will do is give you a lifeline in places where there is congestion since not many users have 5G phones yet.
The real difference maker will come when T-Mobile finally deploys n41 in New Orleans.
But what n71 will do is give you a lifeline in places where there is congestion since not many users have 5G phones yet.
The real difference maker will come when T-Mobile finally deploys n41 in New Orleans.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 3:11 pm to Texas Weazel
Going to 5G Tmobile has been great. Lower bill and faster speeds, you don't really see the speeds so much on your phone but my MIL doesn't have home internet for some weird arse reason in her 1/2 million dollar Houston home and I was using my phone for hot spots and it was faster than any home internet I have ever had.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 3:58 pm to armsdealer
Yeah I get about 130Mbps. I definitely notice it.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 10:42 pm to Texas Weazel
quote:This. Around me there are fricking little mini towers everywhere. Feels like I'm being bombarded with 5g from all around.
Also, at some point Verizon will piss off enough people and have their small cell build out halted. There are similar stories like the one above all over the country. The FCC will eventually fold and shut this down IMO.
Posted on 2/2/21 at 7:52 pm to JDGTiger
Ok my speeds here north of Hammond in a fairly rural area are great—200 mbps down and 20 up in speed test. Much faster than my charter WiFi and my ATT phone is 22 mbps down and 4 mbps up on lte here.
I also have three bars of cellular reception vs 2.
I am going to carry both phones for a week or so. I want to use the faster one as a hot spot for my work from home stuff.
Videos are the main thing I see the difference in.
The t mobile phone is an iPhone 12 and the att phone is a ten.
I also have three bars of cellular reception vs 2.
I am going to carry both phones for a week or so. I want to use the faster one as a hot spot for my work from home stuff.
Videos are the main thing I see the difference in.
The t mobile phone is an iPhone 12 and the att phone is a ten.
This post was edited on 2/2/21 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 2/8/21 at 9:37 am to JDGTiger
JDG,
are you doing that "try our network" thing where they send you a device? I'm considering switching from AT&T too. Looks like my bill could be almost 1/2 of my current bill.
I'd like to hear more reports.
are you doing that "try our network" thing where they send you a device? I'm considering switching from AT&T too. Looks like my bill could be almost 1/2 of my current bill.
I'd like to hear more reports.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 7:52 pm to Geauxlden Eagle
Yes I did that and after a week I moved my number from ATT to T-Mobile.
I am very happy with it. I am using it as a hot spot at home now. I may drop Charter.
You notice the speed when you are streaming or downloading large files. When I set up my phones my 20-30 apps loaded in like 3 or 4 minutes.
Other thing I did was sign up for Amazon HD music streaming--free for 30 days. I am using that to see if I lose connection while traveling.
I get very good download speeds compared to LTE and I get LTE in very remote areas where my ATT phone used to downgrade.
I am very happy with it. I am using it as a hot spot at home now. I may drop Charter.
You notice the speed when you are streaming or downloading large files. When I set up my phones my 20-30 apps loaded in like 3 or 4 minutes.
Other thing I did was sign up for Amazon HD music streaming--free for 30 days. I am using that to see if I lose connection while traveling.
I get very good download speeds compared to LTE and I get LTE in very remote areas where my ATT phone used to downgrade.
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 2/14/21 at 2:41 pm to JDGTiger
I have had T-Mobile for years. I have 6 phones for $120/mo using my son's military discount. Unlimited everything. The only difference being that I recently got a 5G phone S21 Ultra.
I get about the same with 5G as with LTE - @70 mps down.
I get about the same with 5G as with LTE - @70 mps down.
Popular
Back to top
