- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why didn't the Dutch bring on the backup keeper again?
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:36 pm
It worked last time, why not again?
4
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:37 pm to benhamin5555
no subs
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:37 pm to benhamin5555
They already used all 3 of their subs.
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:38 pm to TH03
Gotcha
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:38 pm to PsychTiger
sheet
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:42 pm to benhamin5555
I feel like he's gonna be roasted for wasting the subs if they lose. The current goalie is 0/16 on saving penalties...
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:45 pm to benhamin5555
lmao that keeper blows
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:46 pm to TH03
Why not start Krul in the first place?
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:50 pm to benhamin5555
quote:
Why didn't the Dutch bring on the backup keeper again?
It worked last time, why not again?
No subs, but you would think since he had the foresight last time, he would have this time to save one....
That goalie fricking blows in penalties
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:50 pm to TheWalrus
People will question the keeper decision, but the Dutch only made 2 of their PKs, it wouldn't have mattered who was in goal 
Posted on 7/9/14 at 5:57 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
the Dutch only made 2 of their PKs, it wouldn't have mattered who was in goal
Posted on 7/9/14 at 6:10 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
People will question the keeper decision, but the Dutch only made 2 of their PKs, it wouldn't have mattered who was in goal
Completely irrelevant... Everything changes fluidly throughout. Choices are made as things move along, so you can't assume they would have missed the second one had the other keeper been in goal and stopped one.
Posted on 7/9/14 at 8:30 pm to Lsut81
Van Persie was subbed off for Huntelaar in the 96th minute I believe. The alternative option that Van Haal probably should have taken was getting a tired RVP to stay on for the remaining 24 minutes, sub on Krul near the end, and let RVP take the first PK.
Posted on 7/9/14 at 9:01 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
Why not start Krul in the first place?
Or Vorm
Posted on 7/9/14 at 9:11 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
Why not start Krul in the first place?
Maybe Cillessen is a better keeper during the match and before pk's.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News