Started By
Message

re: USA --- Miracle on Ice Gold vs. 2014 World Cup Championship?

Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30531 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

his is like asking which is better, arse or titties?

The answer is, neither one is better than the other.


Yea, Im out. There is only really one douche in the thread. Which is a shame.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9292 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:38 pm to
Exactly and that was just as big a win in terms of sporting terms as the miracle on ice but the USA team has to win several games like that.

Also can't stress this enough....WE HAD COME IN SECOND TWO TOURNEYS AGO. I don't care how big a gulf there was between the USA and the ussr, the gaps between them and other teams were minimal, it doesn't matter that the team were amateurs. Our amateur basketball teams did pretty good didn't they? If only 5 countries care it doesn't matter
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21119 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

There is no Brazil, Portugal, Spain, Germany...etc...

Equal to the Soviets and the massive gulf between us and them and everyone else.



quote:

and show me the opponent who has dominated the world for 20 years in every major competition?



If Brazil's main competition in soccer was Canada and Sweden, they may have won every single World Cup.
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30531 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

discounting the fact that our group is one of the toughest in WC history,


Its not even the toughest in THIS world cup.



ETA: Ok, Im really out now.

Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31264 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:39 pm to
You care too much about this college/professional difference. Spain has like a dozen guys that did not make their roster that would be the best player on the US national team. For example, some of these superstars are even "college age" players like Isco who is only 21 or 22 I believe. Daniel Carvajal also missed the Spanish team at age 22 and he is one of the premier right backs in the world.

The real difference is that the World Cup gauntlet is more grueling. Winning one absurd game is far easier than getting out of the group and then winning four more games in Brazil (where the home nation could be very well be a late round opponent).

I would predict that a US soccer college all-star team is more likely to beat Brazil or any superpower soccer nation in one single home than the USMNT is to win this World Cup.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:40 pm to
The only decent team our hockey team played in 1980 before they got to Russia was Sweden and possibly Czechoslovakia.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:40 pm to
quote:


Well, there wouldnt be a movie without the Gold Medal so there is that.
If the US were to win the WC, I can guarantee you Spike Lee would kill Brooklynites to do the movie.

It would not be an ABC after school special (yeah, I´ve seen the movie)......
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 9:41 pm
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

There is only really one douche in the thread
According to your logic, there are three.
quote:

Which is a shame.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9292 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:42 pm to
Id argue ours is tougher than the Italy/England group or the Netherlands/Spain group. But it doesn't matter they're each historically tough.

Italy/England is first group with 3 WC winners in one group.
Netherlands/Spain is first group with last tourneys finalist.
Our group is the first where all 4 teams made the group stages last tourney.

So there are 3 historically tough groups
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21119 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Its not even the toughest in THIS world cup.



Yes, it is.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Czechoslovakia.
hence my comment. I´d venture to say they´d be the equivalent of Bosnia-Herzogovina.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

They'd be great wins. Not miracles.


You are right in this regard, but if the US won the whole tournament, getting multiple results against top 10 teams, then yes it would be a miracle. While the US does have players I. Professional leagues, the gap in talent is really large. We don't have one player who is even on a decent European team, or could be considered a star anywhere other than the MLS. That is a stark difference to virtually all the other top nations. So let's say we get into the knockout stages, which means we've gotten results against either Germany or Portugal. Then in the knockouts we face Belgium, Argentina, Italy, and Spain on our way to the trophy. If that happened, it would be one of the greatest runs in WC history. All those teams are vastly superior in talent, and though we could compete with each in a one game playoff, beating them in a tournament, one after another, would be so unbelievable that I wouldn't doubt people would refer to the run as a miracle.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Its not even the toughest in THIS world cup.


According to the average rankings it is. By a half point. It's a pretty tough group.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Netherlands/Spain

I think Chile makes this the toughest group, in spite of Australia being in it.

ETA I think Spain and Chile come out, BTW.
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 9:48 pm
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9292 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:48 pm to
I wouldn't argue with that. But like I said, there are three historically tough groups this wc
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

I would predict that a US soccer college all-star team is more likely to beat Brazil or any superpower soccer nation in one single home than the USMNT is to win this World Cup.


Hope they're all 8ft tall, 2.2 feet wide, and made of bricks, because they aren't making it competitive otherwise

ETA: I agree with you that the US winning would be insane, but I don't even think that an NASL all-star team anchored by ancient Marcos Senna, ancient World Cup winning Kleberson, and a bunch of names that might have meant something at some point would have a greater chance at winning a one off with someone like Spain, Brazil, etc than the US winning a World Cup.
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 10:09 pm
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Marcos Senna

This guy. This guy......

An all time fave, on many levels.
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 10:13 pm
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
30134 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Bluefin

You should post here more often. Your comments are gold.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31264 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 10:19 pm to
The point is that one unthinkable miracle is more likely than four huge upsets. Obviously, the college or NASL team would get ravaged like 99.9% of the time.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
30134 posts
Posted on 6/11/14 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Our familiarity with Mexico helped us and we played super well against the weakest German side since unification.

Yeah... that team still made the finals
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram