- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This thread is for all the Jurgy naysayers....where you at now?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:03 pm to Sheep
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:03 pm to Sheep
Yeah, but if you take him who do you leave off? And how does that help us bring a backup for Beckerman? Honestly if Beckerman, Bradley, or Jones go down we are super fricked.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:10 pm to cwil177
Howard
Guzan
Rimando
Fab
DMB
Besler
Cameron
Brooks
Omar
Yedlin
Parkhurst
Bradley
Jones
Donovan
Beckerman
Mix
Zusi
Bedoya
Green (if we have to keep the promise)
Altidore
Dempsey
Boyd
Aron
Nearly every player has a suitable backup and I think almost everyone is happy besides Wondo, Davis, and Chandler.
Guzan
Rimando
Fab
DMB
Besler
Cameron
Brooks
Omar
Yedlin
Parkhurst
Bradley
Jones
Donovan
Beckerman
Mix
Zusi
Bedoya
Green (if we have to keep the promise)
Altidore
Dempsey
Boyd
Aron
Nearly every player has a suitable backup and I think almost everyone is happy besides Wondo, Davis, and Chandler.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:13 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
No need for 8 defenders. I'm pretty sure there was a study done where it showed you don't need that many. Hence no Parkhurst. But otherwise I agree.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:14 pm to crazy4lsu
I listed Yedlin in the eight, but he is an outside winger for us, so it is really seven.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:17 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
He's not a winger for us. He's a late game sub who would start at RB if he had to start. He's most definitely not a winger. Just because he's used there tactically doesn't mean it is his position. Regardless, Parkhurst would have been a waste of a spot. WC teams rarely use 7 defenders, and if they do, they have a very serious injury crisis.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:19 pm to crazy4lsu
Who would you take then over Parkhurst cause I don't know who you take instead?
Do you want a midfielder? Corona, Edu?
Wondo? I would pick him I guess.
Do you want a midfielder? Corona, Edu?
Wondo? I would pick him I guess.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:20 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
So then there's no Chandler, no Wondo, but Parkhurst and Donovan, instead? I don't rate Parkhurst, but after what we saw of Chandler in the warm-ups, I can't rate him, either.
Lichaj? Lichaj? Bueller?
Lichaj? Lichaj? Bueller?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:22 pm to Keys Open Doors
Boyd and Donovan in. I guess Parkhurst as well, but I am not set on that spot.
Davis and Wondo out. I am indifferent between Parkhurst and Chandler as of now.
I would take Green out of Wondo, but that seems like that was not an option.
Davis and Wondo out. I am indifferent between Parkhurst and Chandler as of now.
I would take Green out of Wondo, but that seems like that was not an option.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:24 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Parkhurst is not of international quality. At least with Chandler you can see why Klinsmann would take him, as he is a fantastic athlete, but lacks intelligence.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:25 pm to crazy4lsu
Fair enough. Chandler over Parkhurst works. The big issues were no Donovan and no backup for Jozy. Nothing else is probably that critical.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:28 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
The back up for Jozy is a massive deal for me. If a target striker is essential to the way you play, why you wouldn't take two is beyond my understanding.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:29 pm to uway
quote:
Clint hasn't done much since he got his nose broken
Other than score the goal that ended up sending us through to the next round...have you been watching the same World Cup?
Donovan would have given us much more quality on the wing, especially as a sub, than that hack Davis.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:35 pm to crazy4lsu
I think 99% of us were on the same page there. I was fine with Wondo, but not at the expense of not having a backup lone striker.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:37 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Fair enough. Chandler over Parkhurst works. The big issues were no Donovan and no backup for Jozy. Nothing else is probably that critical.
I think we needed 5 midfielders for these last two games, and we don't have a backup for Jozy anyway.
Nothing I've seen from Boyd in a US jersey makes me want to play him at lone striker in place of Dempsey even though Dempsey doesn't really fit there.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:39 pm to LSU03
quote:
Other than score the goal that ended up sending us through to the next round...have you been watching the same World Cup?
He hasn't done much to help with possession.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:40 pm to uway
quote:
Nothing I've seen from Boyd in a US jersey makes me want to play him at lone striker in place of Dempsey even though Dempsey doesn't really fit there.
Except he's more likely to be the battering ram that we need just for the sheer fact that he is a very large player. If all he was brought on for was to be the late game sub when we punt it forward, it would have been worth it considering what has happened to Altidore.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 4:40 pm to petar
You're building a nice straw man here...It's the Group of Death, in part because WE were in it. It's the Group of Death because any of those teams would be expected to advance in a normal group. I'm glad we advanced, but we didn't win the group, and we played much of this game with one leg tied behind our back because, Brad Davis.
But most importantly, the choice is not "Bob Bradley or Klinsmann?" The choice is "Klinsmann, or someone better?" for the next World Cup.
But most importantly, the choice is not "Bob Bradley or Klinsmann?" The choice is "Klinsmann, or someone better?" for the next World Cup.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:15 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Regardless, Parkhurst would have been a waste of a spot. WC teams rarely use 7 defenders, and if they do, they have a very serious injury crisis.
Agreed.
RB - Johnson, Cameron, Parkhurst
CB - Besler, Cameron, CB3 (Brooks, Goodson, Omar), Parkhurst
LB - Beasley, Johnson, Parkhurst
I believe that Parkhurst is around the Brad Davis level of player as well - but he's *can* play those positions.
You can leave your 4th CB at home (let's call that Omar), your backup LB (Chandler) and your backup RB (Yedlin) and replace them with one guy.
Without any other changes to the roster (i.e. keep Green, keep Wondo, keep Davis
Now, you have flexibility if/when injury and card accumulation strikes. As it is now, we were sold the line that we brought our two best 11s (+ Rimando), meaning that it's our "first 11" + "our second 11." Clearly, that's a load of horseshite - as many players have no clear replacement. We're left with central midfielders and defenders playing wide positions, and no strikers. We're making it work, but duct tape only holds for so long.
I think making those changes and replacing Davis with Donovan is pretty close to the best lineup we could put on the field.
For those that clamor for the inclusion of Yedlin, that's easy - replace Green.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:41 pm to Shane4689
I say it's good that the Ghanese (is that what they're called?) goalie threw the game.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 5:43 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
quote:
MrFreakinMyagi
If you post that in a few more threads, maybe people will start listening to you.
Popular
Back to top



1



