- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:27 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
but the English press will overlook it
Of course they will. But then they will give a full page to Raheem Sterling's car being dirty.
SCH, you left out the best part of Klopp's argument:
quote:
"Everybody thinks it's a lot of money. It is a lot of money," Klopp said. "But he could've left for crazy money. "The clause for Oblak for example is €100m, so nice!"
A fricking buy-out clause is not the same thing as the actual value of a player. That's like saying Isco is worth 700MM.
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:30 am to theOG
So you think Atletico would’ve sold for less than that?
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:36 am to TheZaba
quote:
So you think Atletico would’ve sold for less than that?
like i said in the other thread no one is paying that crazy clause except PSG
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:39 am to StraightCashHomey21
My point is merely if they weren't gonna sell for less than that, then that's what he's worth to them
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:41 am to TheZaba
How do we know? Did Liverpool ever make a move for him? Was there any interest at all? It is a ridiculous argument to make.
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:42 am to theOG
Of course it's a hypothetical, but compared Oblak going for 100m to Isco going for 700m is just as ridiculous
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:46 am to theOG
If that's the case then go ahead and argue to make yourself feel better
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:47 am to TheZaba
Were you trying to prove your point or mine?
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:50 am to theOG
quote:
Were you trying to prove your point or mine?
quote:That's what the link was for. How exactly did that prove your point?
How do we know? Did Liverpool ever make a move for him? Was there any interest at all?
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:52 am to TheZaba
quote:
That's what the link was for.
Ah, yeah.
quote:
How exactly did that prove your point?
Because his release clause is in fantasy land. Just like Isco's.
This line from your article referencing Oblak cracked me up:
quote:
Liverpool will simply refuse to pay that figure - more than double the current world record fee for a goalkeeper.
Posted on 7/27/18 at 9:55 am to theOG
That was just the journalist adding fluff to the article
Obviously we were willing to pay hefty (not that hefty since we refused to pay when Roma was asking for 100 and 75m initially.
Obviously we were willing to pay hefty (not that hefty since we refused to pay when Roma was asking for 100 and 75m initially.
Posted on 7/27/18 at 10:42 am to TheZaba
The fee is what we were willing to pay to get him... I don't care in the market we're in today...
All I'm interested in now is if he performs well... if he does, I don't care if it was 40, 50, 60 or 70..
The GK market is a lot different to other positions, IMO.. There were only 1 or 2 options available for us that were clear upgrades and 1 was more expensive..
edit: with our trouble at keeper, I'm glad we didn't try and experiment on guys they think MAY improve us.. we've been burned on that the past couple of times..
All I'm interested in now is if he performs well... if he does, I don't care if it was 40, 50, 60 or 70..
The GK market is a lot different to other positions, IMO.. There were only 1 or 2 options available for us that were clear upgrades and 1 was more expensive..
edit: with our trouble at keeper, I'm glad we didn't try and experiment on guys they think MAY improve us.. we've been burned on that the past couple of times..
This post was edited on 7/27/18 at 10:51 am
Posted on 7/27/18 at 10:46 am to TFTC
Agree. You got your guy, now it's just about performance.
Posted on 7/27/18 at 10:53 am to TFTC
quote:All of this. Which is why we did the same thing with VVD and so far I’m pleased with the way that turned out
All I'm interested in now is if he performs well... if he does, I don't care if it was 40, 50, 60 or 70..
The GK market is a lot different to other positions, IMO.. There were only 1 or 2 options available for us that were clear upgrades and 1 was more expensive..
edit: with our trouble at keeper, I'm glad we didn't try and experiment on guys they think MAY improve us.. we've been burned on that the past couple of times..
Posted on 7/27/18 at 11:00 am to TheZaba
He's gotten the squad to a point where he can target specific and clear upgrades on need positions... And are revenue is at a point where we can afford to do this... hopefully, the scatter shot approach to player recruitment is over..
Posted on 7/27/18 at 5:00 pm to TFTC
Gianluigi Buffon was bought by Juventus in 2001 for 52M euro. At that time, that was equal to 46.8M dollars.
46.8M 2001 dollars = 66.3M 2018 dollars ( https://www.dollartimes.com/inflation/inflation.php?amount=100&year=1999)
Alisson's fee was 72.5M euro = 84.5M 2018 dollars
I'm not surprised, due to player inflation and huge TV contracts for leagues, that Liverpool had to pay an 18M premium in 2018 over that of a comparable transfer in 2001.
46.8M 2001 dollars = 66.3M 2018 dollars ( https://www.dollartimes.com/inflation/inflation.php?amount=100&year=1999)
Alisson's fee was 72.5M euro = 84.5M 2018 dollars
I'm not surprised, due to player inflation and huge TV contracts for leagues, that Liverpool had to pay an 18M premium in 2018 over that of a comparable transfer in 2001.
Posted on 7/27/18 at 5:41 pm to beatbammer
Buffon was bought for like £34 million
The standard for transfers, and back the the euro was no where near as strong as it is now.
You guys basically doubled the Emerson fee still
The standard for transfers, and back the the euro was no where near as strong as it is now.
You guys basically doubled the Emerson fee still
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News