Started By
Message

re: Rank the top 10 football leagues in the world

Posted on 9/17/12 at 3:29 pm to
Posted by DB10_AFC
South Louisiana
Member since Jun 2012
7080 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 3:29 pm to
I knew I forgot something.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 3:31 pm to
I haven't watched the Ukrainian league in a couple years. I worked with a guy from the Ukraine and he told me more useless Ukrainian shite than I care to know (hence my bias towards them in this thread). I also watched my fair share of illegal Ukrainian streams.

Agreed 100% on Ligue 1.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9423 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Dynamo Kiev has always been the king I believe.



Since the league started in the early 90s with Ukraine's independence, Kiev has won it about twice as much as Shaktar but they've always been pretty good.

They were decent historically in the Russian League but, yes, Kiev was much more the power until the Ukrainian League was founded.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Ligue 1 is probably the number 1 feeder league for the big leagues right now.



What about La Liga? Not a feeder league per se, but aside from RM and FCB, the league has provided a ton of talent to other leagues in the past 5 or so years.
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 3:43 pm to
The Portuguese league is probably a better shout as a feeder league. FC Porto has provided half the players on every major team the past 10 years, and the other clubs in that league have done a fantastic job of scouring South America for talent.

La Liga isn't a feeder league per say, because many of its best players stay on their original professional clubs for awhile, David Villa, David Silva, Fernando Llorente etc.
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 3:47 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

FC Porto has provided half the players on every major team the past 10 years


A bit superlative here, if I am reading you correctly. Porto has sold some great players though. Portugal offers an easy transition to Europe for lots of South Americans, which is why the league has such an advantage.

France does the same for many Africans, though the French develop talent better. I suppose you could call Lyon the Porto of France with the way they sign young players and sell them for hefty fees.
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 4:11 pm to
I'm obviously being hyperbolic, but if you look at their transfer history, the money they've made off of transfers is outstanding. Lyon did the same thing in the 2000s, but I don't recall any big money sales from Lyon lately.



Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

La Liga isn't a feeder league per say, because many of its best players stay on their original professional clubs for awhile, David Villa, David Silva, Fernando Llorente etc.



There are also many doing the opposite.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:44 pm to
1. ESS-EEE-SEE
2. NFL

everybody else
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31255 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

I agree with this for Europe with the exception of Ligue 1 which I think probably has a lot more depth than the others in that tier?

Yeah, I have France solidly as fifth and ahead of the rest of the tier, but I was just trying to recap what was said in this thread to my best. Maybe I misinterpreted some earlier posts.

Dandy, my tiers were not really ordered, so if it makes you feel better, then Spain can be #1.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram