Started By
Message

re: Montreal unveil their MLS logo

Posted on 8/7/11 at 1:01 am to
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 1:01 am to
Not a fan of the crest. It has some good elements, but I hate the attempt to make the logo slightly 3D. Also not a fan of the gradients and shading.
Posted by LSUCanFAN
In the past
Member since Jan 2009
28100 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 1:40 am to
quote:

bet they end up higher than the other Canadians.

Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15307 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 3:25 pm to
I like it!!
It does NOT have a soccer ball in it. Excellent.
What IS it with these singular, stupid nicknames....Impact, Crew, Fire, Revolution, Galaxy, ...sorry, I just don't like it, and it doesn't matter the sport, although in years past I supported the Jazz, and the Brass.

Football clubs nicknames need to be organic, not branded. Everton are toffees, because the FANS started calling them that, and the same for other clubs. All this test marketing a team name, then changing just bugs me to no end.

Soccer is not a Tigers or Bulldogs, or whatever kind of sport, TO ME, unless those names are earned or given by the fans. Hull City are Tigers because of their colors, not because it was test marketed. LSU is Tigers because of a long glorious history dating back to the 19th century.

Like Montreal's badge, like the motto on it, like Blackburns' Arte et labora....like the colors, just that stupid name.

Thank the Lord Dallas Burn and Tampa Bay Mutiny are gone.
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 3:47 pm to
its why FC NOLA needs to happen
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 3:57 pm to
Need a name change:
Montreal Impact
San Jose Earthquakes
Colorado Rapids
New England Revolution
Columbus Crew

Need a crest change:









Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 4:05 pm to
I agree with everyone of those.
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26190 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

San Jose Earthquakes


I disagree with this one.

The NASL team (back in the 70's when Pele played) was named the Quakes. They should stick with that tradition. They need a new crest for sure, though.
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 4:23 pm to
Speaking of New England does anyone think they might be better off in Boston instead of Foxborough?
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 4:30 pm to
I know it's tradition, but it's really lame.
Posted by MisterDoctorMister
Member since Jul 2011
387 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Speaking of New England does anyone think they might be better off in Boston instead of Foxborough?


Absolutely, but since the Kraft's own Gillette Stadium it's free to play there. I think Harvard Stadium would be a much better temporary alternative.
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26190 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Speaking of New England does anyone think they might be better off in Boston instead of Foxborough?


Everybody should think that.

New England needs a soccer stadium anywhere. If they build one, they will do better than they're doing now. The problem is that the Krafts own Gilette stadium, so there's no economic benefit to getting a new stadium.

They'd rather be minor league and leech off of the rest of the league.
Posted by americanoutlaw
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2010
4917 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 6:33 pm to
That's where the Breakers play, so it may actually cause a minor conflict. I'm sure they could share since the guys share with the Pats.
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 7:07 pm to
I'm glad the Kansas City Wizards are no more.
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 7:11 pm to
dont forget about some of their jerseys
This post was edited on 8/7/11 at 7:12 pm
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 7:12 pm to
Posted by Lexo
LaPlace
Member since May 2008
3436 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

Football clubs nicknames need to be organic, not branded. Everton are toffees, because the FANS started calling them that, and the same for other clubs. All this test marketing a team name, then changing just bugs me to no end.


I agree, but, I think American teams can try a bit too hard to emulate European clubs.

Real Salt Lake, Sporting KC, DC United... none of them sound right.
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Real Salt Lake, Sporting KC, DC United... none of them sound right.



I actually love the sound of DC United

Sporting KC isn't bad at all IMO

I can agree on Real Salt Lake though.
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 7:23 pm to
Yeah I think DC United sounds good. Sporting KC is a lot better than the Wizards and Real Salt Lake is pretty dumb IMO.
Posted by Lexo
LaPlace
Member since May 2008
3436 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 7:51 pm to
I guess if I wanted to get hyper-technical, none of them should use FC either. Since the American term is soccer, it should be SC Dallas or Toronto SC. But, we'll leave that alone.
This post was edited on 8/7/11 at 7:53 pm
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 8/7/11 at 8:53 pm to
Kind of a neat video Montreal made

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram