- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If there was ever an MLS team in the southeast... what's a good name?
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:17 pm to WarSlamEagle
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:17 pm to WarSlamEagle
Meh, there's not much else I can really say. Atlanta has poor attendance for its non-NFL sports, and I am unsure as to how NASL numbers truly translate statistically. I think starting an MLS team is extremely challenging to begin with, for any city.
And great, they have an owner and a stadium. So did every failed MLS expansion team. Not sure why you're harping on that as being relevant since that's not what I'm referring to.
And great, they have an owner and a stadium. So did every failed MLS expansion team. Not sure why you're harping on that as being relevant since that's not what I'm referring to.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:23 pm to acgeaux129
quote:
Atlanta has poor attendance for its non-NFL sports
pot meet kettle when it comes to ATL and Nola the hornets games have awful #'s and the saints pre 2005 were not exactly packing the house.
I could careless if ATL gets a team but they are clearly the best option in the south.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:27 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
But you picked Nashville man. That is just embarrassing.
actually no, they have come in good #'s to USMNT games
lol, so has Jacksonville man.
quote:
frick no
oh yeah, it was Redskins.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:27 pm to StraightCashHomey21
I would get season tickets for NOLA FC. I would root against the Atl Uppity Black Folk. So NOLA wins.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:28 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
pot meet kettle when it comes to ATL and Nola the hornets games have awful #'s and the saints pre 2005 were not exactly packing
Is this a joke?
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:29 pm to acgeaux129
quote:
Is this a joke?
no you can't be for real if you think saints games where packed pre 2005
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:32 pm to acgeaux129
quote:
Not sure why you're harping on that as being relevant since that's not what I'm referring to.
It's relevant for a freaking bid. Puts you ahead of the other potential cities. Orlando City has plans, but their stadium hit a rough patch with legislation. Again, I'm talking about the bid.
No one knows for sure how the turnout will be, but the Sounders had lower numbers before they made their MLS move than Atlanta has now. Then they go to MLS and the attendance explodes.
I think with all of the factors lined up, it appears that Atlanta would look more like the 19 current MLS franchises than the two that went under in the Dark Ages.
As for the crappy sports town problem...Atlanta draws more than Kansas City in MLB and NFL, and Sporting Kansas City sells out their stadium a good bit. Now, the Falcons/Braves > Chiefs/Royals...so that makes a difference. Still, Atlanta wouldn't be the "worst" sports town in terms of attendance with a MLS team.
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:33 pm to StraightCashHomey21
New Orleans has been right in line with Atlanta for quality vs. attendance with 1/5 of the population.
While I'm a fan of New Orleans teams, etc. I'm not some diehard NOLA clown FWIW.
While I'm a fan of New Orleans teams, etc. I'm not some diehard NOLA clown FWIW.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:34 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:
It's relevant for a freaking bid.
awesome!!
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:46 pm to acgeaux129
quote:
I'm not some diehard NOLA clown FWIW.
good b/c the saints vs falcons shite talking threads are awesome being a neutral party
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:56 pm to acgeaux129
quote:
awesome!!
Well, that's what I've been referring to the entire time. Took you long enough to figure it out.
I have no idea how it will turn out, but the conditions look favorable. You're the dude with the crystal ball.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:57 pm to StraightCashHomey21
My wish would be Nashville. They do well in supporting hockey and its a great city to visit and bar hop. It's just a wish though. I don't know if it would be successfull but I would hit up a handful of games every year.
And as to the original question, something whiskey themed. Distillers, bootleggers, moonshiners etc. I know those aren't really pc but new franchise names are almost always terrible theses days.
And as to the original question, something whiskey themed. Distillers, bootleggers, moonshiners etc. I know those aren't really pc but new franchise names are almost always terrible theses days.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:04 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:
Well, that's what I've been referring to the entire time. Took you long enough to figure it out.
Lolz, I've been discussing the feasibility the whole time.
quote:
You're the dude with the crystal ball.
Correct.
So we can't speculate on success/failure like y'all have for all the other cities? Okay.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:09 pm to acgeaux129
Whatever, man. I think Atlanta is a good spot for MLS expansion for several reasons, and you know that it will fail because it's Atlanta. Nothing's gonna change that.
A lot more factors go into the success/failure of an expansion team, but I think the factors we can see right now point to a favorable outlook for Atlanta and MLS. I can't say for sure that it'll be a roaring success. I can say that it looks like a good expansion city compared to the others.
A lot more factors go into the success/failure of an expansion team, but I think the factors we can see right now point to a favorable outlook for Atlanta and MLS. I can't say for sure that it'll be a roaring success. I can say that it looks like a good expansion city compared to the others.
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:11 pm to WarSlamEagle
That sounds fair.
never mind, you edited. but the melodramatic stuff is cool.
never mind, you edited. but the melodramatic stuff is cool.
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:12 pm to acgeaux129
And I know you're not a NOLA nut or whatever, but I think the city would do well for a second or third-tier team. The market size is just too small for MLS to take a look.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:15 pm to WarSlamEagle
Both Atlanta and Nashville would be a good addition. I'd be fine if neither team had a real "name" outside of Atlanta FC or the like. We don't need a name like the "Galaxy". A secondary name will come just through experience.
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:22 pm to Lordofwrath88
The Gulf Coast Fighting Marlins
Posted on 6/2/13 at 2:02 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:
As for the crappy sports town problem...Atlanta draws more than Kansas City in MLB and NFL, and Sporting Kansas City sells out their stadium a good bit. Now, the Falcons/Braves > Chiefs/Royals...so that makes a difference. Still, Atlanta wouldn't be the "worst" sports town in terms of attendance with a MLS team.
Eh, that is somewhat hard to compare. Arrowhead has ~6k more seats than the Georgia Dome. Also, KC used to pack Arrowhead but recently it has dwindled with the lack of success of the team. Meanwhile the Falcons attendance has risen recently with the success of the team.
And as for the Royals, Kauffman has a lot less seats than Turner Field and the Braves are a lot more successful so no arguments there.
Btw SKC averages about 19,400 while Sporting Park holds about 18,400, so they sell it out more often than "a good bit"
ETA: I think Atlanta will be a good MLS market in a few years, but just wanted to point that stuff out
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 2:03 pm
Popular
Back to top


2




