Started By
Message

re: If there was ever an MLS team in the southeast... what's a good name?

Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:17 pm to
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:17 pm to
Meh, there's not much else I can really say. Atlanta has poor attendance for its non-NFL sports, and I am unsure as to how NASL numbers truly translate statistically. I think starting an MLS team is extremely challenging to begin with, for any city.

And great, they have an owner and a stadium. So did every failed MLS expansion team. Not sure why you're harping on that as being relevant since that's not what I'm referring to.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Atlanta has poor attendance for its non-NFL sports


pot meet kettle when it comes to ATL and Nola the hornets games have awful #'s and the saints pre 2005 were not exactly packing the house.

I could careless if ATL gets a team but they are clearly the best option in the south.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

But you picked Nashville man. That is just embarrassing.


actually no, they have come in good #'s to USMNT games


lol, so has Jacksonville man.

quote:

frick no


oh yeah, it was Redskins.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:27 pm to
I would get season tickets for NOLA FC. I would root against the Atl Uppity Black Folk. So NOLA wins.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

pot meet kettle when it comes to ATL and Nola the hornets games have awful #'s and the saints pre 2005 were not exactly packing


Is this a joke?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Is this a joke?


no you can't be for real if you think saints games where packed pre 2005
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Not sure why you're harping on that as being relevant since that's not what I'm referring to.

It's relevant for a freaking bid. Puts you ahead of the other potential cities. Orlando City has plans, but their stadium hit a rough patch with legislation. Again, I'm talking about the bid.

No one knows for sure how the turnout will be, but the Sounders had lower numbers before they made their MLS move than Atlanta has now. Then they go to MLS and the attendance explodes.

I think with all of the factors lined up, it appears that Atlanta would look more like the 19 current MLS franchises than the two that went under in the Dark Ages.

As for the crappy sports town problem...Atlanta draws more than Kansas City in MLB and NFL, and Sporting Kansas City sells out their stadium a good bit. Now, the Falcons/Braves > Chiefs/Royals...so that makes a difference. Still, Atlanta wouldn't be the "worst" sports town in terms of attendance with a MLS team.
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 12:54 pm
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:33 pm to
New Orleans has been right in line with Atlanta for quality vs. attendance with 1/5 of the population.

While I'm a fan of New Orleans teams, etc. I'm not some diehard NOLA clown FWIW.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

It's relevant for a freaking bid.


awesome!!
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

I'm not some diehard NOLA clown FWIW.



good b/c the saints vs falcons shite talking threads are awesome being a neutral party
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

awesome!!

Well, that's what I've been referring to the entire time. Took you long enough to figure it out.

I have no idea how it will turn out, but the conditions look favorable. You're the dude with the crystal ball.
Posted by tripleLindy
Chattanooga,TN
Member since Aug 2011
173 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 12:57 pm to
My wish would be Nashville. They do well in supporting hockey and its a great city to visit and bar hop. It's just a wish though. I don't know if it would be successfull but I would hit up a handful of games every year.

And as to the original question, something whiskey themed. Distillers, bootleggers, moonshiners etc. I know those aren't really pc but new franchise names are almost always terrible theses days.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Well, that's what I've been referring to the entire time. Took you long enough to figure it out.


Lolz, I've been discussing the feasibility the whole time.

quote:

You're the dude with the crystal ball.


Correct.


So we can't speculate on success/failure like y'all have for all the other cities? Okay.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:09 pm to
Whatever, man. I think Atlanta is a good spot for MLS expansion for several reasons, and you know that it will fail because it's Atlanta. Nothing's gonna change that.

A lot more factors go into the success/failure of an expansion team, but I think the factors we can see right now point to a favorable outlook for Atlanta and MLS. I can't say for sure that it'll be a roaring success. I can say that it looks like a good expansion city compared to the others.
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 1:11 pm
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:11 pm to
That sounds fair.

never mind, you edited. but the melodramatic stuff is cool.
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 1:13 pm
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:12 pm to
And I know you're not a NOLA nut or whatever, but I think the city would do well for a second or third-tier team. The market size is just too small for MLS to take a look.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:15 pm to
Both Atlanta and Nashville would be a good addition. I'd be fine if neither team had a real "name" outside of Atlanta FC or the like. We don't need a name like the "Galaxy". A secondary name will come just through experience.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84835 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:22 pm to
The Gulf Coast Fighting Marlins
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 1:24 pm to
AC Atlanta.
Posted by svb
Missouri Fan
Member since Jun 2012
3127 posts
Posted on 6/2/13 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

As for the crappy sports town problem...Atlanta draws more than Kansas City in MLB and NFL, and Sporting Kansas City sells out their stadium a good bit. Now, the Falcons/Braves > Chiefs/Royals...so that makes a difference. Still, Atlanta wouldn't be the "worst" sports town in terms of attendance with a MLS team.


Eh, that is somewhat hard to compare. Arrowhead has ~6k more seats than the Georgia Dome. Also, KC used to pack Arrowhead but recently it has dwindled with the lack of success of the team. Meanwhile the Falcons attendance has risen recently with the success of the team.

And as for the Royals, Kauffman has a lot less seats than Turner Field and the Braves are a lot more successful so no arguments there.

Btw SKC averages about 19,400 while Sporting Park holds about 18,400, so they sell it out more often than "a good bit"

ETA: I think Atlanta will be a good MLS market in a few years, but just wanted to point that stuff out
This post was edited on 6/2/13 at 2:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram