- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You democrats brought this on yourselves
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:22 pm to GeauxFightingTigers1
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:22 pm to GeauxFightingTigers1
I didn't have much of a problem with the first two, but confirming a judge one week before the election is a bit crappy to me. But I understand it. They played within the rules of the game and sadly our highest court is now just a game.
So I expect the dems to play the game to their favor and the court is forever tainted for everyone.
So I expect the dems to play the game to their favor and the court is forever tainted for everyone.
4
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
They didn’t apply it to SC votes, but they sure af changed it.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:24 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
They played within the rules of the game and sadly our highest court is now just a game.
And you can thank the Democrats for that. The ball started rolling with what Ted Kennedy did to Robert Bork.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:25 pm to munchman
quote:Good point. After Bush, then McCain, everyone was proclaiming the Republicans would be a party on its death bed by 2020.
They never envisioned the republicans being in power when Harry Reid did away with the filibuster.
They thought Crooked Hillary would be president & house-senate democratic.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:25 pm to geauxtigers87
Lol! Trump should hand write Harry a Reid a thank you note and CC Chuck Schumer!
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:27 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
I didn't have much of a problem with the first two, but confirming a judge one week before the election is a bit crappy to me. But I understand it. They played within the rules of the game and sadly our highest court is now just a game. So I expect the dems to play the game to their favor and the court is forever tainted for everyone.
The rules were already played with by Reid, not sure what rule you are talking about. The Republicans played by the Dems rule, you and them just don't like the outcome.
Don't be puss.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:27 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
No crying about it at all, but it's true, go look it up. Reid changed the rules for lower courts, and the Republicans changed the rules for the Supreme Court.
It’s the same rules, regarding federal judicial confirmation, you idiot.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:30 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
Except they did not change the Supreme Court rules, the Republicans did.
But nice try
Oh my sweet summer child. Go post on DU and collect some soros bucks
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:30 pm to geauxtigers87
frick that
they brought it on themselves with Judge Bork
they brought it on themselves with Judge Bork
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:31 pm to mtntiger
quote:
Voting against an imminently qualified judge simply because she might vote for limits on the "right" to kill babies.
How disappointed will you be when that doesn't happen?
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:32 pm to RoscoeSanCarlos
quote:I would say, at this point, replace Thomas and Alito with young, conservative constitutionalists to extend the conservative court for decades.
Lol! Trump should hand write Harry a Reid a thank you note and CC Chuck Schumer!
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:33 pm to mtntiger
quote:
Voting against an imminently qualified judge simply because she might vote for limits on the "right" to kill babies.
Said same thing on Kav, but did he do anything on their right to murder babies. no i dont think so. Damn sky screaming losers.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
How disappointed will you be when that doesn't happen?
You probably need to wait a few days for this to gain traction.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:35 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Voting against an imminently qualified judge simply because she might vote for limits on the "right" to kill babies.
How disappointed will you be when that doesn't happen?
Now there's a retarded take
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
Shocked face
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:35 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
I didn't have much of a problem with the first two, but confirming a judge one week before the election is a bit crappy to me.
So a President is only supposed to do their job for 3.75 years of their term? That’s what you’re saying, right?
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:40 pm to Goforit
quote:
Pay back!
Not payback at all, it’s just playing by the rules lol
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:40 pm to Tigers0918
quote:You would be straight-faced lying if you said the Dems would have rolled over and waited until after the election if Hillary was president and Dems controlled the Senate.
I didn't have much of a problem with the first two, but confirming a judge one week before the election is a bit crappy to me.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:41 pm to Centinel
quote:
And you can thank the Democrats for that. The ball started rolling with what Ted Kennedy did to Robert Bork.
This... In the current age of ever increasing media... What Kennedy did to Bork was criminal in the moment and forever changed the character of the supreme court justice selection process.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:47 pm to Centinel
quote:
You probably need to wait a few days for this to gain traction.
You overestimate some of these people.
And right on time, there's one now...
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:49 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
Except they did not change the Supreme Court rules, the Republicans did.
But nice try
Harry Reid was a Republican? He was the one who changed the rules that required 60 votes on judicial nominees to a simple majority in 2013. Remind me again who controlled the Senate in 2013.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News