Started By
Message
locked post

You can’t hardly find accurate/unbiased COVID-19 information anywhere

Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:04 pm
Posted by TulaneFan
Slidell, LA
Member since Jan 2008
14035 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:04 pm
I was curious about the current mortality rate for Coronavirus, so I tried to Google search it.

Nothing but straight up bullshite and overinflated stats. Everything had an angle, only articles about what is happening in Italy and the high death rates amongst old people were what came up. It’s obvious the propaganda machine is hard at work right now.

99% of articles are overhyping the virus severely, while accurate and relevant information is being buried

Posted by thadcastle
Member since Dec 2019
2615 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:07 pm to
Based off Johns Hopkins Coronavirus data it is 4.783%. That is based off of confirmed cases.

ETA: Not sure why people are down voting math and facts .
This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 4:11 pm
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
16973 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Nothing but straight up bullshite and overinflated stats.

And you know this how? You would have to have a an accurate data set to compare it to. How do know your set is accurate if
quote:

You can’t hardly find accurate/unbiased COVID-19 information anywhere
This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 4:12 pm
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

can’t hardly find accurate/unbiased COVID-19 information anywhere

quote:

I tried to Google search it

:|
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6837 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:10 pm to
While I can't vouch for the ultimate accuracy, the Worldometer site has been very consistent in their numbers.

My tracker (link in OP in the stickied thread at the top of the forum) has mortality info for the US based on the numbers that have been published.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32242 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:10 pm to
Not using a double negative for sure.
Posted by TulaneFan
Slidell, LA
Member since Jan 2008
14035 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

And you know this how?


I don’t know... I just know that when a bunch of people tell you different things, someone has to be lying. I can only guess these figures are over exaggerated because it fits the narrative
Posted by Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Lafayette LA
Member since Nov 2005
14089 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:14 pm to
Ii just found some

“We aren’t even testing all of the people who are symptomatic. We are only testing the most severe cases due to limitations placed upon us” Dr Stefanski - Head of the Lafayette Parish Covid Medical Response Team

Also mention cases doubling in the area
This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 4:15 pm
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Based off Johns Hopkins Coronavirus data it is 4.783%. That is based off of confirmed cases.

ETA: Not sure why people are down voting math and facts .


Because the data is wrong and incomplete?
Posted by thadcastle
Member since Dec 2019
2615 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Because the data is wrong and incomplete?


I agree, I bet it is closer to 1% but based off the data we currently have that is the mortality rate.
Posted by CajunTiger92
Member since Dec 2007
2821 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:36 pm to
I've looked for a compilation of data that Louisiana reports every day but haven't come across one yet. A simple table that has the data for each day. Most of the places I've looked simply replace the report every day.
Posted by thadcastle
Member since Dec 2019
2615 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

I've looked for a compilation of data that Louisiana reports every day but haven't come across one yet. A simple table that has the data for each day. Most of the places I've looked simply replace the report every day.

All data for all states

LA currently has a 3.779% mortality rate, based off confirmed cases.
This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 4:41 pm
Posted by mightyMick
Member since Aug 2018
3067 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:50 pm to
Consider this from ground zero state Washington, where the coronavirus has been in the country the longest. Interesting.

LINK
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

I was curious about the current mortality rate for Coronavirus, so I tried to Google search it.


The short answer is that is at the moment unknowable. Anyone who tells you they have that answer is lying, guessing, or stupid. Mortality rate is the % of the people who have it who've died. Right now, no one can say with any level on confidence how many people have it. So when you see a high mortality rate like in LA, it is just as likely that there are many people who have it and are fine and aren't in the denominator.


LINK

quote:

The COVID Tracking Project collects information from 50 US states, the District of Columbia, and 5 other US territories to provide the most comprehensive testing data we can collect for the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. We attempt to report positive and negative results, pending tests, and total people tested for each state or district currently reporting that data.



This link I think has the best US data because in addition to listing positive cases and deaths, it lists hospitalizations and the total number tested.
This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 4:54 pm
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
20111 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Nothing but straight up bullshite and overinflated stats

Based on?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Based off Johns Hopkins Coronavirus data it is 4.783%. That is based off of confirmed cases.

ETA: Not sure why people are down voting math and facts .




because that is complete bullshite because NOBODY knows the denominator to do the calculation
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30008 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 5:26 pm to
using google or bing as your search engine is like only watching CNN/MSNBC and then complaining about not getting unbiased china virus information anywhere
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7629 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 5:28 pm to
Doesnt matter as the denominator isnt known and an accurate one will likely never be known as most testing in the US for sure has been only people with worse cases and bad symptoms, at least in the beginning.

If your only testing the worst cases your worst outcomes will have higher numbers
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

I don’t know... I just know that when a bunch of people tell you different things, someone has to be lying. I can only guess these figures are over exaggerated because it fits the narrative


It's not necessarily that. It's that one of the two variables in the equation has giant confounding variable (% of population tested) and there is no good way to get around it or correct for it mathematically, not yet at least. If you're looking for a better way to measure the deadliness, try COVID -19 mortality as a percentage of COVID-19 hospitalization. That's a much more shelf stable metric. Better still all cause respiratory mortality per 000 this year vs. the population corrected average over the last 3 years.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45211 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 6:20 pm to
The media takes info from the Chinese Communist Party as the gold standard.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram