- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ waits for ruling and runs another story with sources.. Trump involved
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:18 pm to NashvilleTider
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:18 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
People are falling into the same trap as the last term. This is all BS - but the media can shape the narrative with headlines. The administration needs to get a handle on this.
I agree and have said as much somewhere on this board today.
0
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:18 pm to Jjdoc
Supposedly trump found out a few months ago that his name was mentioned throughout the files.
Since then it appears as though trumps attitude toward the whole thing has changed.
Since then it appears as though trumps attitude toward the whole thing has changed.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:20 pm to Jjdoc
If Obama’s name was mentioned in the files, would anyone doubt the veracity of it?
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:22 pm to antman123
quote:
so they have names
Yes
quote:
just unsubstantiated claims
No, Names and other stuff which may include unsubstantiated claims or party invitations.
quote:
they release said names, not only do they set off a witch hunt, but how do they not get sued by all of those people that they have now tied to epsteins crimes with no actual proof.
That's why the courts won't release the GJ testimony.
quote:
theres no way they are going to release names unless they have actual evidence of those people committing crimes. no matter how bad people want the witch hunt.
See immediately above^
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:25 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
i was of the opinion that we might see some grand jury testimony documents because that would be the stuff most likely to have actual evidence substantiating it. i guess we will have to see how the judges rule in the other cases that they requested
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:25 pm to 14&Counting
Mid-terms are going to be a blood bath. So much material against the magats.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:28 pm to Kentucker
Wager?
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:30 pm to Houag80
So you'll bite at the shiny thing in front of your face because it's shiny. This is a shiny thing
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:33 pm to KiwiHead
So like you with anything you think will get Trump
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:33 pm to KiwiHead
If Trump was in it then the dems would have released the files years ago because they are so eaten up with TDS.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:37 pm to Jjdoc
So Elon wasn’t lying??
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:37 pm to Auy2k
trump is in the files, everyone knows this, but what you are saying, i think, is if there was any evidence of trump doing anything wrong in the files, it clearly would have been leaked at a minimum
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:39 pm to PorkSammich
elon was implying that trump had banged kids with that tweet, thats why he said he went too far and deleted it. no one with any sense would not assume trump would be mentioned in the epstein files given their known history
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:44 pm to Auy2k
No doubt on the Epstein files. Personally, I think Trump doesn't want it released because innocent people and true victims could be hurt by the release.
I actually think he's being pretty decent in respect to the victims......he knows however you'll never accept it, so he has to misdirect and offer you up some rancid meat for you to chew on for a few days.
You'll eat it, too.
I actually think he's being pretty decent in respect to the victims......he knows however you'll never accept it, so he has to misdirect and offer you up some rancid meat for you to chew on for a few days.
You'll eat it, too.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:46 pm to jbdawgs03
Not just yet. Let’s see if Trump can pull some magic out of his arse and make this Epstein mess go away. He’s trying awfully hard with the Obama and Clinton distractions, neither of whom seem at all worried. He’s very good at manipulation but this involves the people who voted for him only because of the economy - a very big group. They may finally be repulsed by his character enough to desert him.
If it does come to it, what kind of wager are you thinking about?
If it does come to it, what kind of wager are you thinking about?
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:47 pm to Jjdoc
Who didn't know Trump's name were in the files?
There are a bunch of names in the files.
There are names all over the JFK files. That doesn't mean every name in the file killed JFK.
There are a bunch of names in the files.
There are names all over the JFK files. That doesn't mean every name in the file killed JFK.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:49 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
If Obama’s name was mentioned in the files, would anyone doubt the veracity of it?
Michelle Obama called Weinstein a dear friend and a wonderful human.
Was Michelle fricking actresses with Weinstein? She must have since they are besties.
Add whoopi to the guilty list too.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:00 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
I actually think he's being pretty decent in respect to the victims......he knows however you'll never accept it, so he has to misdirect and offer you up some rancid meat for you to chew on for a few days.
Trump is not known for his empathy.
The bottom line in this situation is that he is the sitting president and there is speculation about his involvement with Epstein. Lots of it. He has three options:
1. Shutter the files and accept whatever comes;
2. Release all of the files and accept whatever comes; and,
3. Make it all go away.
He’s desperately trying for the third option but it isn’t working. It isn’t going away. Will he try something more extreme next? Say, resigning? Oh, sorry, I’m fantasizing.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:06 pm to Kentucker
quote:
I’m fantasizing
Now that’s a reasonable and rational conclusion. The rest of it, not so much.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News