Started By
Message
locked post

Would You Support a "Living Wage"?

Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:26 pm
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
21958 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:26 pm
If it meant that all social programs were denied to those that worked because they make enough money to no longer qualify.

Isn't that the rub? That we subsidize the bottom line of companies that intentionally underpay their employees because they are all on SNAP, Section 8 or some form of government assistance.

Would certainly help identify those that are just looking for a handout rather than a handup.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:29 pm to
I’d support replacing all welfare and removal of minimum wage with universal income if that’s the offer.
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12026 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:29 pm to
About as much as I'd support a 'dying' wage. Nobody gets paid for doing nothing or doing bottom-of-the-barrel work.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:31 pm to
Minimum wage was NEVER intended to be a wage to support a family or household.

It was "MINIMUM" wage because it was supposed to be for part-time high school kids working after school and summer workers.
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18073 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

I’d support replacing all welfare and removal of minimum wage with universal income if that’s the offer.


What would that accomplish? Where’s the difference?
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
21958 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:32 pm to
quote:


I’d support replacing all welfare and removal of minimum wage with universal income if that’s the offer.


You could interpret it that way, and feel free. But I was speaking more of raising wages to a base "living wage" and in exchange removing the ability of companies to underpay employees by raising that wage above the cutoff for all subsidies.
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
21958 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:33 pm to
quote:


Minimum wage was NEVER intended to be a wage to support a family or household.

It was "MINIMUM" wage because it was supposed to be for part-time high school kids working after school and summer worker


I wasn't debating the definition or the history of minimum wage. I was positing a completely different hypothetical.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57220 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

It was "MINIMUM" wage because it was supposed to be for part-time high school kids working after school and summer workers.


If you're an adult making minimum wage at your primary place of employment, the problem is with you, not the system.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:35 pm to
Free college
Free trade school.

Medicare for 55 and up.

Socialist security, as is.

The advantage of so called living wage is the end of small time hoodlum crime. No need. No hookers either.



Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36031 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:42 pm to
I we gave everyone a "living wage" and people used that up, and they needed food, shelter, heslthcare; we'd wind up giving them more and more. There would be no cap.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:43 pm to
No.

Also time to put time limits on welfare, and caps on welfare for able bodied people.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Free college
Free trade school.
It would not be free, otto, it would be paid by other taxpayers.

Get your terminology straight.
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
6124 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:48 pm to
My solution: Set a "living wage" if that's what you want to call it. Every able bodied person has a set time to find a job. If your job pays less than the living wage the government will supplement the difference. If you're too lazy to work, you get nothing.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:50 pm to
No.

We should do away with the minimum wage too. There is no reason to prevent a person from taking a job at a wage less than minimum wage.

Many of the unemployed today are simply not worth the minimum wage. Perhaps an employer would take a chance on them at $3 or $5 per hour.

Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 5:57 pm to
I already make a living wage
Posted by westerntigerfan
Member since Oct 2012
886 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

I’d support replacing all welfare and removal of minimum wage with universal income if that’s the offer.


What would that accomplish? Where’s the difference?


It would get rid of the massive government entitlement bureaucracy. There would be no need for government housing programs, no department of education, no medicaid, no Obamacare, no food stamp program, no welfare. There would be much less waste fraud and abuse, and it would shrink the size of government. We've spent the last 80 years building up these programs in America, they are not going anywhere. We might as well replace them with something that works better and shrinks government.

Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
24959 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Would You Support a "Living Wage"?
You mean wealth redistribution? Taking money from those who earn it and give it to those who dont? No i do NOT support a living wage
Posted by PickupAutist
Member since Sep 2018
3022 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 6:14 pm to
Personally believe if you go more than a year or two making minimum wage, the problem is probably you.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

If it meant that all social programs were denied to those that worked because they make enough money to no longer qualify


I’d rather the social programs be denied to those who refuse to work.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24750 posts
Posted on 9/29/18 at 6:17 pm to
2 Thessalonians 3:10

For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram