- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Would you like to see some tweets from the editor-in-chief of Scientific American?
Posted on 11/7/24 at 12:13 am
Posted on 11/7/24 at 12:13 am
Posted on 11/7/24 at 12:32 am to L.A.
Jeez, how unprofessional.
This bitch needs to be fired. Embarrassing.
This bitch needs to be fired. Embarrassing.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 12:33 am to L.A.
Sounds like a very cool & logical person who takes in all the facts & evidence before forming their opinion.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 12:37 am to L.A.
She must have a high therapist bill. It’s about to get higher.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 5:09 am to L.A.
I feel like a large portion of these type of people have some previous childhood bully trauma they are letting drive their adult behaviors.
Maybe Trump reminds them of them but they are just illogically behaving.
Maybe Trump reminds them of them but they are just illogically behaving.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 5:13 am to DomincDecoco
Could be.
Or she could have just been drinking and started shite-posting on her social.
Or she could have just been drinking and started shite-posting on her social.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 5:21 am to L.A.
I don’t think I’ll read Scientific American.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 5:37 am to L.A.
Apparently Laura Helmuth has a history of embarrassing herself…
Substack
Substack
She’s crazy.
That any magazine, especially one that supposedly is about science, would have this nut as a leader speaks volumes.
quote:
This is just the latest example in a long history of Laura Helmuth screwups. A recent BMJ investigation documented over a dozen social media posts by Helmuth promoting transgender care for children, despite scientific evidence showing such treatment has had “devastating consequences” for minors. And after she posted last year on X that “sparrows have four different chromosomally distinct sexes” the Wall Street Journal reported that X’s community notes had to correct Helmuth’s error.
Substack
quote:
Earlier this week, a reader sent me this post on Blue Sky, with Helmuth promoting an article falsely claiming there was evidence to support six-feet social distancing during COVID. There isn’t. Former NIH Director Francis Collins and Tony Fauci have both testified to Congress that this evidence doesn’t exist. Helmuth shoehorns this narrative into Scientific American by ignoring Tony Fauci’s congressional testimony that six feet social distancing was “an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data” and then insisting it’s actually just a political fight between Fauci and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Substack
She’s crazy.
That any magazine, especially one that supposedly is about science, would have this nut as a leader speaks volumes.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 5:39 am to L.A.
Thats how you perpetuate female stereotypes...
Popular
Back to top

10









