- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would it be morally justified, if you could go back in time and kill baby Hitler?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:07 pm
I've heard people say how dropping the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified, because it ended a war that would have costed a multitude of more lives if extended.
So if you could get into a time machine and kill baby Hitler, would you?
So if you could get into a time machine and kill baby Hitler, would you?
26
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:07 pm to Revelator
Sure?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:08 pm to Revelator
I would seriously consider it. But I try to leave that kind of thing to God.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:10 pm to Revelator
Just go back and accept him to art school.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:12 pm to VOR
If one believes in objective morality, and believe that murder is objectively evil, then it is never ok regardless of consequence.
If one believes morality is relative with no ultimate arbiter of good/evil, then it's all relative to the individual doing the killing's perspective. Because I think the majority of humanity would agree we'd be better off without Hitler having ever come to adulthood, it would be pretty easy to justify it.
Of course the world would we so radically different without WWII that you'd be playing with fire.
If one believes morality is relative with no ultimate arbiter of good/evil, then it's all relative to the individual doing the killing's perspective. Because I think the majority of humanity would agree we'd be better off without Hitler having ever come to adulthood, it would be pretty easy to justify it.
Of course the world would we so radically different without WWII that you'd be playing with fire.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:13 pm to Revelator
Cernovich Tweet?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:13 pm to Revelator
Since it's vitally important to your belief system, consider Hitler's actions are the reason Israel exists today. Without Hitler, there is no re-establishment.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:13 pm to Revelator
Given the opportunity why not just go cockblock his dad
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:15 pm to anc
quote:
Just go back and accept him to art school.
Or let Charles Manson cut a record!
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:16 pm to Revelator
It's a false question.
Because You would also kill millions of Europeans through starvation before Hitler.
The post-war plan was to starve Germany to death after WWI by the Americans and mostly British.
If one word could describe Germany during the immediate aftermath of World War I, it would be "starvation." And yet, while some 900,000 German men, women and children were starving to death, the American and British public knew nothing about the reason for this holocaust, deliberately caused by the continuation of a wartime British naval blockade.Even today, only a few non-Germans know the truth, and American and British historians, for the most part, have participated in the coverup of this most appalling crime.
The guilt of the world press in covering up the atrocity is compounded by the fact that the American and British public were told of the starvation itself, but were kept ignorant of the criminal policies of the Allies which produced it.
Hitler reversed this and saved millions of Germans in the 1930's from starvation and death at the hand of the Allies.
He then ended up condemning those to death in war years later...but Germany was on the brink of total disaster after WWI.
So ironically Hitler saved millions of Europeans and then condemned millions of Europeans to death.
Because You would also kill millions of Europeans through starvation before Hitler.
The post-war plan was to starve Germany to death after WWI by the Americans and mostly British.
If one word could describe Germany during the immediate aftermath of World War I, it would be "starvation." And yet, while some 900,000 German men, women and children were starving to death, the American and British public knew nothing about the reason for this holocaust, deliberately caused by the continuation of a wartime British naval blockade.Even today, only a few non-Germans know the truth, and American and British historians, for the most part, have participated in the coverup of this most appalling crime.
The guilt of the world press in covering up the atrocity is compounded by the fact that the American and British public were told of the starvation itself, but were kept ignorant of the criminal policies of the Allies which produced it.
Hitler reversed this and saved millions of Germans in the 1930's from starvation and death at the hand of the Allies.
He then ended up condemning those to death in war years later...but Germany was on the brink of total disaster after WWI.
So ironically Hitler saved millions of Europeans and then condemned millions of Europeans to death.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:16 pm to CoachChappy
So many dead because Hitler’s father had a weak pullout game. 
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:17 pm to Revelator
Is this a metaphor for Baby Trump? Don’t make me go back in time to stand guard over Golden Baby GEOTUS and all the filthy, filthy Progressive time travelers who would hurt him. If one of you dirty bastards so much as slow plays him on his binky, Imma be all up in yo grill...
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:18 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
It's a false question.
It's not false. I didn't ask about the future repercussions of such an act. I just asked if you personally would do it?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:19 pm to Revelator
Sure.
Why not.
The anti semites of the country would probably not like that many joos hanging around controlling the media and what not, but then there would be no israel for america to dote upon, so i guess it would be a wash.
Why not.
The anti semites of the country would probably not like that many joos hanging around controlling the media and what not, but then there would be no israel for america to dote upon, so i guess it would be a wash.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:22 pm to Revelator
Though shalt not kill
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:22 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Don’t make me go back in time to stand guard over Golden Baby GEOTUS and all the filthy, filthy Progressive time travelers who would hurt him.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:24 pm to Revelator
Well - silly revelator - Adult hitler is clearly still alive today. Why not just kill adult hitler to serve justice? Who even needs a time machine in this hypothetical?
Tool.
Tool.
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:26 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Since it's vitally important to your belief system, consider Hitler's actions are the reason Israel exists today. Without Hitler, there is no re-establishment.
Becsue it was God's will for Israel to once again be established as a country, it would have happened regardless.
This post was edited on 2/17/18 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:29 pm to Revelator
Was it also God's will to kill two thirds of them in order to get the holy land?
Posted on 2/17/18 at 6:32 pm to PuntBamaPunt
quote:
Was it also God's will to kill two thirds of them in order to get the holy land?
God could have certainly accomplished the task of returning Jews to Israel without the Holocaust.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News