Started By
Message

re: Willis/Wade Trial Day 2 Link

Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:00 am to
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
11804 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:00 am to
Here it is on Rumble. It is better to give them the eyes/revenue than Google/Youscrewed

LINK

edit: this is from yesterday. I will try to find todays.


here is todays:
LINK
This post was edited on 2/16/24 at 8:10 am
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20288 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:03 am to
They just started
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
11804 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:03 am to
quote:

She fits the empowered black woman stereotype


I have worked with several. Most are intolerable and intolerant. Even the competent ones cover for the majority who are incompetent and promoted way over their skills and ability.

It should piss of the competent black women and they should out the bad apples, but they instead let the rot spread to them. smh
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15561 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:04 am to
quote:

SlowFlowPro

Posted this yesterday but wanted your thoughts. I don’t deal with the criminal system, so out of curiosity

we all had to take ethics, right? It was even a separate exam to be licensed.

The appearance of impropriety standard was 100% covered in that class for public official recusals. It isn’t limited to just judges from my memory

THE WHOLE POINT of a special prosecutor was that there had to be some sort of conflict in the DA’s office, right? They are supposed to be completely independent as in Ken Starr, Mueller, etc., unless it’s different from the federal system somehow?

You’d think a lawyer would know they can’t frick the independent counsel you appointed because your office couldn’t ethically handle the case? She seems to say oh well, I didn’t realize I couldn’t do that she she’s a prosecutor herself. It just seems insanely bold to lie like that
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
9201 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:05 am to
What? Fat, lazy, corrupt, arrogant and stupid?
That empowerment.
She appears to have obtained her law degree from "We's be the Law University "
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
9201 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:06 am to
Simple answer.

In this case it's (D)ifferent...because of OMB.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80171 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:08 am to
Boo, no more Willis this morning. Hopefully defense recalls her at end
Posted by geauxkoo
Member since Oct 2021
1361 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:08 am to
He had to let her ramble so she can't say later, on appeal, that she was not allowed to properly respond.

On top of that, when you have someone who just talks and talks like both her and her boy toy, you just let them continue to dig the hole.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14622 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Boo, no more Willis this morning. Hopefully defense recalls her at end



Wait, what?
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19359 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Boo, no more Willis this morning. Hopefully defense recalls her at end

I'm shocked her side isn't doing a cross. They can lead. Why would you not?
Posted by autauga
Member since Sep 2015
3655 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:14 am to
If Willis sees something on YouTube she doesn't like she will barge into court and demand to testify again.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422891 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:14 am to
quote:

You’d think a lawyer would know they can’t frick the independent counsel you appointed because your office couldn’t ethically handle the case? She seems to say oh well, I didn’t realize I couldn’t do that she she’s a prosecutor herself. It just seems insanely bold to lie like that

If I had the abilities to read minds like God, I'd bet 100 SFP dollars before gaining that ability that she was lying.

Creating a story where this un-marked, un-tracked, and un-documented cash is being used by a major public official to reimburse a third party, is a bigger deal to me. That means they don't have any sort of plausible deniability and are grasping for the most dangerous explanation possible.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80171 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:14 am to
Bc they are cutting their losses. They know it will do no good and defense will immediately be able to recross and fire her up.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422891 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:17 am to
quote:

I'm shocked her side isn't doing a cross. They can lead. Why would you not?

They never wanted her on the stand.
Posted by AmishSamurai
Member since Feb 2020
2667 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:18 am to
quote:

That means they don't have any sort of plausible deniability and are grasping for the most dangerous explanation possible.


There is no explanation that would make any sense.

The fact that the DA for the state of GA regularly pays 3rd parties in cash, without receipt, for "legal services" is a clear ethics violation and should result in her being disbarred.

But Fani is a double threat to legal proceedings so nothing is going to happen.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80171 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:18 am to
quote:

They never wanted her on the stand.


Yup her big arse mouth and attitude got the best of her... She fricked herself and its glorious.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422891 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Yup her big arse mouth and attitude got the best of her... She fricked herself and its glorious.


I was eating lunch live and I looked up and was like "who is the lady in red? Is that Willis?"

I went and watched it again. She literally storms in like a wrestler interrupting a promo and both the judge and her attorney react with a "oh my fricking god. please god no. frick my life" reaction.
Posted by hogcard1964
Illinois
Member since Jan 2017
10495 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:20 am to
I don't believe the prosecution is actually done questioning her.
Posted by AmishSamurai
Member since Feb 2020
2667 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:21 am to
Also her claim of commingled campaign funds that she may have used personally because "cash is fungible" is a felony violation and should result in prison time.

But again, she's got that double threat immunity and won't get a single day in prison ...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422891 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:21 am to
quote:

The fact that the DA for the state of GA regularly pays 3rd parties in cash, without receipt, for "legal services"

huh?

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 43
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 43Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram