- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wikileaks schools NPR, beats NPR like a rented mule
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:09 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:09 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Nowhere near as amusing as watching your flip.
Except I won bigly with the flip and saw Hillary Clinton defeated and the conservative majority on the Supreme Court preserved, you know something you didn't vote for.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:14 pm to Sentrius
quote:Thank you for your interest in Navytiger74.
You passive agressive melt and quiet rage at Trump supporters has been quite amusing the last few months. I know you were looking so very much forward to berating and heckling them after Trump lost the election but you can't do that so you have to find other convenient scapegoats in other elections, culture wars between the left and right and just being salty about whatever Trump does in office.
I'm pretty convinced that the only thing that has kept you truly melting down about Trump winning is that you apparently and allegedly hate Hillary Clinton.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:16 pm to Sentrius
quote:
Except I won bigly with the flip
Not so far.
quote:
saw Hillary Clinton defeated
So did I.
quote:
conservative majority on the Supreme Court preserved
So did I.
quote:
something you didn't vote for
Incorrect.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:20 pm to GenghisKhan
quote:I'm actually fond of saying that if you live most places in the south you may as well go ahead and consider your tax dollars recycled back into your respective shitty state. And by your dollars, I mean all of yours plus a good helping from other donor states like Virginia, Washington, etc. So let's just concede that in all likelihood I'm wasting taxpayers' dollars who live in New Jersey or California or something.
He actually sits his arse in an office somewhere and post all day on OT using our tax dollars.
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:20 pm to Navytiger74
[quote) Just to clarify things, what are you upset about concerning WikiLeaks?
That they masquerade as an openness and civil libertarian organization while likely acting, in at least some tangential way, as a part-time agent of Moscow. As alleged by many, most recently the Director of CIA.
[/quote]
So, you are basically saying they aren't fair?
WkiLeaks
That they masquerade as an openness and civil libertarian organization while likely acting, in at least some tangential way, as a part-time agent of Moscow. As alleged by many, most recently the Director of CIA.
[/quote]
So, you are basically saying they aren't fair?
WkiLeaks
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:21 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Thank you for your interest in Navytiger74.
He just read your mail, phony, and you're too stupid to see it.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:23 pm to DawgsLife
quote:No. No, actually.
So, you are basically saying they aren't fair?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:25 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
So, you are basically saying they aren't fair?
No. No, actually.
Actually, yes. Had they hacked and released emails on everybody you would be happy, right?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:25 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
So, you are basically saying they aren't fair?
No. No, actually.
Yes. Yes Actually.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:28 pm to DawgsLife
quote:No, I would still very much despise Assange and his organization and dream of the day when gets a 6x6 in a federal prison. But they would have a stronger case for being a nonaligned champion of openness. As it stands, you have to be pretty stupid to buy that.
Actually, yes. Had they hacked and released emails on everybody you would be happy, right?
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:30 pm to Sentrius
quote:It's amazing how people find voting for the candidate who won as a personal victory. Any convictions they have for one candidate will get twisted around to justify support for the frontrunner.
Except I won bigly with the flip
quote:And there you have the only justification, 50% of which is that he (eventually) picked a winner.
and saw Hillary Clinton defeated and the conservative majority on the Supreme Court preserved
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:30 pm to Navytiger74
Damn. Whole lot of beatdown in this thread. Time to kneel the ball with 4:00 left in the game.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:32 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:You'd probably understand the salience of the points a little better if I could somehow post in crayon, baw.
Damn. Whole lot of beatdown in this thread. Time to kneel the ball with 4:00 left in the game.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:34 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
But they would have a stronger case for being a nonaligned champion of openness.
So it is their hypocrisy? Is that why you despise them so much?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:36 pm to DawgsLife
quote:Why I despise them so is perfectly apparent. But you're free to ask if you're done with shitty guesses.
Is that why you despise them so much?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:36 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
It's amazing how people find voting for the candidate who won as a personal victory. Any convictions they have for one candidate will get twisted around to justify support for the frontrunner.
Kind of like when a football team wins a game and their fans take it as a victory?
quote:
And there you have the only justification, 50% of which is that he (eventually) picked a winner.
That was a very important issue for him....and me I might add. What was important to you, and what did Hillary promise to fulfill your hopes?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:38 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
So it is their hypocrisy? Is that why you despise them so much?
He is a believer in the government he works for. He is a narcissist and an elitist. He thinks we are ignorant peons.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:40 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
How could you not trust that winning face?
Slimy statist politician.
Granted, she's only marginally less of a statist.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:41 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Why I despise them so is perfectly apparent.
Actually, it isn't. I see you complain that they exposed Hillary but did not expose Trump. And then you go to they are not what they represent themselves to be.
Those are the two common threads that seem to run through your responses, yet when try to clarify you say I am not correct.
Can you plainly and succinctly explain your problem that does not indicate it is because they are not fair or they are hypocrites, then? I am just trying to get down to the core reasoning.
Popular
Back to top



3






