Started By
Message

re: Wikileaks schools NPR, beats NPR like a rented mule

Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by DawgsLife
Ellijay, Ga.
Member since Jun 2013
62121 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

He is a believer in the government he works for.

What government does he work for?

quote:

He is a narcissist and an elitist.

Can you name me one politician that isn't?

quote:

He thinks we are ignorant peons.

So, you don't like Hillary Clinton, either, I assume?
Posted by GenghisKhan
Gulf Coast
Member since Aug 2016
960 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:09 pm to
Yeahh, cuz in your estimation the Old South does not contribute a damn thing to the present day federal government. We be just a bunch of culcha and rednecks waitin on our gubberment checks every month!
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Actually, it isn't. I see you complain that they exposed Hillary but did not expose Trump. And then you go to they are not what they represent themselves to be.
Those are the two common threads that seem to run through your responses, yet when try to clarify you say I am not correct.

Can you plainly and succinctly explain your problem that does not indicate it is because they are not fair or they are hypocrites, then? I am just trying to get down to the core reasoning.


I understand, intimately, the fact that the government of even a free society needs to carry out some of its functions, specifically those relating to the national security, in secret. The intelligence community and the capabilities its officers, agents, servicemembers, and contractors bring to bear are critical to keeping this country safe. And when it does its job well, you rarely hear about it.

I have little sympathy for all of the pleas for openness for the sake of openness as it concerns national security. But it's an especially unpersuasive argument for the compromise of important secrets, especially those relating to sources and methods, when it's clearly not in service to openness at all, but to some foreign power or partisan agenda. When it disadvantages us and our vital interests the world over.
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 2:13 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:10 pm to
What's funny is that even if wiki was exposing Russia along with Hillary, NT would still be pissed because they didn't expose Trump too.

Make no mistake. This is about NT being pissed Trump won. All else is a smoke screen
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12447 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

have little sympathy for all of the pleas for openness for the sake of openness as it concerns national security. But it's an especially unpersuasive argument for the compromise of important secrets, especially those relating to sources and methods, when it's clearly not in service to openness at all, but to some foreign power or partisan agenda. When it disadvantages us and our vital interests the world over.


Say it with me, "Exposing the election rigging of Podesta, the DNC, and Hillary Clinton is GOOD for our national interests."
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Say it with me, "Exposing the election rigging of Podesta, the DNC, and Hillary Clinton is GOOD for our national interests."


I'm not talking about the election right now. Jesus. I'm talking about disclosures going back the better part of a decade prejudicial to the US, UK, Germany, Australia, France.

Let go of the fricking election bone. That's probably the only thing that drew most of your asses into this thread in the first place. No one is trying to rob you of the highlight of your lives. We're talking about broader issues. Why don't you go back five years if you want to see me beating the same drum about fricking Assange, Snowden, Greenwald, Manning and the whole lot.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Wikileaks schools NPR, beats NPR like a rented mule



If NPR was any worse, they'd be CNN or Buzzfeed.
Posted by DawgsLife
Ellijay, Ga.
Member since Jun 2013
62121 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I have little sympathy for all of the pleas for openness for the sake of openness as it concerns national security.


Was any of the information classified as Top Secret?
I mean, if Wiki was wrong to expose the information, wasn't Hillary just as complicit for keeping it on an unsecured server? One that was forbidden? Then Abedin sending that to her husband, who had not clearance at all, so he could copy them? I mean, if they had done none of those things this would not be an issue, would it?
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12447 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I'm not talking about the election right now. 


Say it.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Say it.



ROFLMAO
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167102 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

What's funny is that even if wiki was exposing Russia along with Hillary, NT would still be pissed because they didn't expose Trump too.

Make no mistake. This is about NT being pissed Trump won. All else is a smoke screen

No doubt whatsoever this is the case. Yet, there has been what 4-5 pages of NT74 and Cuckeye saying absolutely nothing in this troll thread; but their convoluted cons of pure BS. One of the other posts in here saying NT74 is a narcissist that thinks he is above all of us-rings so damned true.

But the dirty little secret he constantly dances around is: this is: because he is just like the democrats-- he is in a bubble above us all in knowing what is good for us.

This thread turned into a cuckeye, NT74 troll job. It is a trifling waste of time.

Stand by for DCuckeye to respond with deflective, short, magic eight ball answers-- like he is so above all thinking he and NT74 are in a limo asking for grey poupon. When they are really trolling jackasses.

4 more pages... and no one will still know what NT74 or Cuckeye are really arguing.
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 1:33 pm
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

This is about NT being pissed Trump won


That's been pretty clear for months.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
49846 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Make no mistake. This is about NT being pissed Trump won. All else is a smoke screen


Exactly. Clint kept talking about how he was go8ng to troll this board soooo hard When Trump lost.

Only problem? Yet again, just like wit Jeb, Iran, Trump/Russians, Obamacare, etc., Clint was WRONG yet again.

Yet, he hides behind a slick avatar and pretends to be better than anybody else. By now, who hasn't figured him out?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Say it.


Pepsi's better than Coke?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

troll thread
Not my thread, Gidget. Go reread the OP. Teach Shorty to read with comprehension and you two can even discuss it amongst yourselves.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Must be sad to spend your Sunday Morning literally hoping that the west continues to be flooded with more 3rd worlders. Then again, you do support amnesty and open borders.


This.

All this Russia hysteria is insane. Russia is your primary concern? Really?

It would honestly be better for the future of France if it was invaded by Russia at this point. That might actually keep France from becoming part of the caliphate.

Liberalism is killing the West quickly.
Posted by DawgsLife
Ellijay, Ga.
Member since Jun 2013
62121 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Pepsi's better than Coke?



Heresy I tell you! Heresy!




Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17353 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

It would honestly be better for the future of France if it was invaded by Russia at this point.


Russia would be better than President Angela Merkel?
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:48 pm to
Fascinating story on how Macron's IT team set up Wikileaks and the Russians by seeding false information and email addresses into phishing attempts. How Macron bitchslapped Fancy Bear
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167102 posts
Posted on 5/7/17 at 1:50 pm to
Every time you call me a derogatory misogynist name; or tell me to go cook you something, one of the little liberal fairies dies. It is very sad.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram