- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why should we trust that AG Barr is not a political operative/appointee
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:25 pm
He most likely, in his 70s, left a easy multimillion dollar job as a partner at one of the best firms in america...to potentially take all the heat for trump.
We still don't know who paid off all of BK's debts, mortgages before his confirmation.
Is it really implausible to suggest that GOP operatives have paid Barr multimillions through backchannels to steer the russia thing clear?
Its clear that the evidence in the report is damning, unethical, unflattering, and alarming, but not prosecutable. Our standard for governance and good faith in our institutions cannot just be *legality means acceptability*. That destroys all norms and customs that we side pass because of our good faith in man, belief in the greater good, belief in our good intentions, and bc we dont want to be straddled with over legislation and government oversight.
We are undoing those good faith measures now because far too many in this country base their morality off of our laws (which have been sadly immoral at various times in history).
What has Barr done to deserve our good faith in him considering how he has plagued the investigation from its outset? We have a documented, by his own admission, overseer of the most important political investigation in US history? Why should we just trust that he does have ulterior motives?
He's near retirement and possibly took a multimillion dollar pay cut for this pressure cooker?
Doesn't add up, nor should it to you either
We still don't know who paid off all of BK's debts, mortgages before his confirmation.
Is it really implausible to suggest that GOP operatives have paid Barr multimillions through backchannels to steer the russia thing clear?
Its clear that the evidence in the report is damning, unethical, unflattering, and alarming, but not prosecutable. Our standard for governance and good faith in our institutions cannot just be *legality means acceptability*. That destroys all norms and customs that we side pass because of our good faith in man, belief in the greater good, belief in our good intentions, and bc we dont want to be straddled with over legislation and government oversight.
We are undoing those good faith measures now because far too many in this country base their morality off of our laws (which have been sadly immoral at various times in history).
What has Barr done to deserve our good faith in him considering how he has plagued the investigation from its outset? We have a documented, by his own admission, overseer of the most important political investigation in US history? Why should we just trust that he does have ulterior motives?
He's near retirement and possibly took a multimillion dollar pay cut for this pressure cooker?
Doesn't add up, nor should it to you either
52
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:26 pm to StrongSafety
He destroyed the 5 families
Now hes doing it again with his good bro Trump and Guily
We realize how scared you all are
Now hes doing it again with his good bro Trump and Guily
We realize how scared you all are
This post was edited on 4/11/19 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:27 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
Why should we trust that AG Barr is not a political operative/appointee
WTF? All U.S. Attorney Generals are political appointees.
Name one that is not. You can't.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:28 pm to GumboPot
quote:
WTF? All U.S. Attorney Generals are political appointees.
Name one that is not. You can't.
But, but hand picked by the President. This is a precedent, right?
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:28 pm to StrongSafety
Where is your evidence that Barr is trying to cover up findings?
1) he offered to mueller to read his summary of key conclusions
2) he is seeking advice and counsel of mueller in the redaction process of whole report
3) he agreed to testify
1) he offered to mueller to read his summary of key conclusions
2) he is seeking advice and counsel of mueller in the redaction process of whole report
3) he agreed to testify
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:28 pm to StrongSafety
The mafia bro
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:28 pm to StrongSafety
Wow. That is the only word I can find. Just, wow.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:28 pm to StrongSafety
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:29 pm to DelU249
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:29 pm to GumboPot
Typo.I meant operative. He just loathed conspiracy theories at a House meeting yesterday. He made a very nuanced defense for 45 yesterday in the midst of his hearing.
Who does he work for -- 45 or the us? The DOJ is supposed to be a independent judiciary branch, but the presidents judiciary branch which he can wield and weaponize at his leisure
Who does he work for -- 45 or the us? The DOJ is supposed to be a independent judiciary branch, but the presidents judiciary branch which he can wield and weaponize at his leisure
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:29 pm to StrongSafety
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:30 pm to StrongSafety
But we should totally trust Eric Holder & Loretta Lynch aka Elizabeth Carlisle right?
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:30 pm to StrongSafety
You mean like Odumbf*ck's Wingman?
Despite having the MOST CORRUPT administration in the history of this country, Odumbf*ck appointed the two biggest pieces of criminal FILTH to be his Attorney General. As a result, he goes around now telling anyone who would listen how his administration was so clean because there was never any investigations into wrong doings.
Despite having the MOST CORRUPT administration in the history of this country, Odumbf*ck appointed the two biggest pieces of criminal FILTH to be his Attorney General. As a result, he goes around now telling anyone who would listen how his administration was so clean because there was never any investigations into wrong doings.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:31 pm to StrongSafety
Hey StrongSafety, if you're looking for the Q thread, it's the one with about a gazillion pages.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:33 pm to Kankles
quote:
Loretta Lynch aka Elizabeth Carlisle right?
I guarantee you that that reference will go over the heads of every ProgFilth on this board because neither PMSNBC nor the ClintonNewsNetwork has ever even MENTIONED it.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:33 pm to DelU249
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Where is your evidence that Barr is trying to cover up findings?
1) he offered to mueller to read his summary of key conclusions
2) he is seeking advice and counsel of mueller in the redaction process of whole report
3) he agreed to testify
He has done the bare minimum, what about the choices in between. You're completely ignoring his 19 page opinion on the SC that as laughed as as legal trash by vet lawyers. Is he not a biased observer and now overseer? Why did he come to a conclusion on the report as opposed to sending it to congress first? He could have sent it to them redacted, without a conclusion.
He refused to say if he shared it with the WH. Agents have come out and said he didn't use their summaries. He literally used 4 partial sentences from the 300+ report in his 4 page summary.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:34 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
Who does he work for -- 45 or the us?
Sure.
When Barr fails to enforce the law please let us know.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 3:35 pm to StrongSafety
Hey numb nuts, are you Tarzana, BamaAtl triplets ???
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News