- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why has Massie never gone after releasing the information on the Congress sex slush fund?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:30 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
My brother in Christ, it isn't a difficult thing to answer.
Pivot!
Why hasnt he be after this all year? Hes all bark no bite
0
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:31 am to stout
quote:
Why hasn't he been as consistent on releasing the info as he has with the Epstein list?
As I told young boosie years ago, it's all about the reaction.
Trump turned this into a war in a major unforced error. That's going to lead to responses, which then leads to more unforced errors from the campaign/MAGA content creators, which will lead to more responses from those who have remained consistent on the issue.
Trump and his admin have handled this Epstein matter about as bad as you can. Just self-sabotage after self-sabotage and about 4-5 major 180s. And this isn't even including the retarded ruse about the grand jury materials and trying to sell that as "the Epstein files".
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:31 am to Powerman
quote:
Does he need to talk about everything 24/7 for it to matter?
He could at least go as hard after it as he has the Epstein list
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:31 am to stout
Probably because he is on it.
This is the list the public should demand
This is the list the public should demand
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes. I want to release the congressional sexual slush fund list,” the congresswoman wrote on X.
You know a post on x doesn’t actually do anything.
The point still stands. They aren’t really fighting hard to release this.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:32 am to stout
quote:
He could at least go as hard after it as he has the Epstein list
I don't think your comparison here is worth caring about. He did bring attention to it.
The public seems much more interested in the Epstein list
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump turned this into a war in a major unforced error. That's going to lead to responses, which then leads to more unforced errors from the campaign/MAGA content creators, which will lead to more responses from those who have remained consistent on the issue.
So you are admitting it's more about attention for Massie than actual principles.
quote:
Trump and his admin have handled this Epstein matter about as bad as you can.
I agree. The binders were such a stupid way to try to pacify the calls for action.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:34 am to stout
quote:And yet the same rules dont apply with Trump and the Epstein files.
The staunch small-government libertarian could really win me over
Not a cult.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump and his admin have handled this Epstein matter about as bad as you can. Just self-sabotage after self-sabotage and about 4-5 major 180s. And this isn't even including the retarded ruse about the grand jury materials and trying to sell that as "the Epstein files".
Not to mention sending Maxwell to club fed after a private meeting with Trump's former attorney
That alone stinks of corruption and leads to a lot of questions
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:34 am to Powerman
quote:
He did bring attention to it.
And dropped it when it didn't get the clicks on X and the news headlines he was seeking. That's not very principled and makes him just another character in the soap opera that is our political discourse.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:35 am to stout
quote:
So you are admitting it's more about attention for Massie than actual principles.
No. That's not what I said.
There was no major blowback on the Congress sex slush fund, so there was nothing to keep it going. It just died.
Trump's admin and MAGA content creators attacked Massie for being on the right side of the issue, which means everyone else on the right side of the issue had to respond. The attention-creating behavior was from Trump, his admin, and the MAGA content creators promoting the NPC talking points.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:35 am to Lighteningbolt
quote:
And yet the same rules dont apply with Trump and the Epstein files.
Not a cult.
Where did I say I didn't want the list released? I think it's a waste of time fighting over the list, considering we will probably lose midterms, so we should focus more on more important matters, but I do think it all should be released.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There was no major blowback on the Congress sex slush fund, so there was nothing to keep it going. It just died.
Such principles and the excuses you ppl make
L after L
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:36 am to dgnx6
quote:
You know a post on x doesn’t actually do anything
Slofro doing Slofro things
He use to quote/cite other slofros and use that as his fundamental argument
Now he pulls X post to make an empty point
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. That's not what I said.
There was no major blowback on the Congress sex slush fund, so there was nothing to keep it going. It just died.
You didn't say it but your post pretty clearly summarized that when there was no red meat for Massie to garner himself some attention, he dropped it like a hot potato.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And this isn't even including the retarded ruse about the grand jury materials and trying to sell that as "the Epstein files"
So you don’t want to know who Maxwell was getting girls for?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:38 am to dgnx6
quote:
You know a post on x doesn’t actually do anything.
What about Massie and MTG trying to get Congress on board?
quote:
The point still stands. They aren’t really fighting hard to release this.
They're doing the same thing. It's just this one has more support from Congress (for obvious reasons)
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:38 am to Padme
quote:
He use to quote/cite other slofros and use that as his fundamental argument
Now he pulls X post to make an empty point
Sir, this is a Wendy's
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:39 am to dgnx6
quote:
So you don’t want to know who Maxwell was getting girls for?
We already know the answer to that question within the context of that prosecution, and the answer is Epstein.
You're just furthering my point about how stupid focusing on the grand jury testimony is. It was a slight of hand/ruse by the admin for ignorant NPCs. Nothing more.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:40 am to Powerman
quote:
The public seems much more interested in the Epstein list
There is more likely an actual list of Congress using slush money than an Epstein list.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News