- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do they call it transphobic?
Posted on 11/20/23 at 9:22 pm to SaintsReportExile
Posted on 11/20/23 at 9:22 pm to SaintsReportExile
Same reason they chose everything. To subvert and undo everything in the dominant culture.
Diversity Equity Inclusion , CIS …. They are meant to warp & obfuscate, current language and understanding. It’s no coincidence that DEI stands as a direct opposition to Opus Dei. . CIS is both a misapplication of the original term, as well as a smack in the face to those who grew up using the word “sissy.” Turning it on its head from that original common usage.
Of course, they won’t admit to this, and will quickly bring up that it’s purely academic in origin. But that only dates back to 1994.
These people want to create chaos and misunderstanding.
Diversity Equity Inclusion , CIS …. They are meant to warp & obfuscate, current language and understanding. It’s no coincidence that DEI stands as a direct opposition to Opus Dei. . CIS is both a misapplication of the original term, as well as a smack in the face to those who grew up using the word “sissy.” Turning it on its head from that original common usage.
Of course, they won’t admit to this, and will quickly bring up that it’s purely academic in origin. But that only dates back to 1994.
These people want to create chaos and misunderstanding.
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 9:24 pm
1
Posted on 11/20/23 at 9:26 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's the same reason they don't want to acknowledge that homos and trannies are doing these things BY CHOICE and are not born that way.
Correct. It has been proven that there is no homosexual gene.
quote:
There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms
LINK
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 11/20/23 at 9:26 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
What does CIS even stand for? Normal?
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:16 pm to SaintsReportExile
It places them in a position of being victimized, which is bolstered by advocacy, so it becomes empowering.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:18 pm to SaintsReportExile
quote:speak for yourself
We are not scared of you at all
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:19 pm to SaintsReportExile
I was watching Catfish earlier and the host was wearing a “stop trans hate” tee shirt.
How ironic. A man who made a career outing those pretending to be someone they’re not, knighting for people literally pretending to be someone they’re not.
How ironic. A man who made a career outing those pretending to be someone they’re not, knighting for people literally pretending to be someone they’re not.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:19 pm to SaintsReportExile
I'm transnegative.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:22 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:I don't know, I've never watched it
What does CIS even stand for?
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:23 pm to SaintsReportExile
quote:
We are not scared of you at all.
They know that.
It's supposed to suggest that you are a redneck who is 'afraid' of anything you "don't understand."
The left continually deliberately distorts language and the meaning of words. You know that.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:24 pm to Demshoes
I’m a trans woman butch lesbian
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:25 pm to jeffsdad
Homonauseous ; not homophobic
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:25 pm to LRB1967
quote:
I don't think transphobic is a real word
I'm so glad it doesn't matter what you think.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:28 pm to MemphisGuy
Yes, replace CIS for 'normal', just like you'd replace 'trans' for fake. But they can't say those things, because it undercuts their intentions.
In short, CIS was hijacked and repurposed by some weird sexual fetish academic who claims its origins are some obscure early 1900's German study or some such. It's all wholly contrived and just basic elitist gibberish. Like all Leftist crap.
In short, CIS was hijacked and repurposed by some weird sexual fetish academic who claims its origins are some obscure early 1900's German study or some such. It's all wholly contrived and just basic elitist gibberish. Like all Leftist crap.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:28 pm to SaintsReportExile
These are my thoughts...
They are trying to make you look like the bad guy and claim that you are threatening the trans and gay folk, thereby diverting attention from the true victim, which are the children.
They are trying to make you look like the bad guy and claim that you are threatening the trans and gay folk, thereby diverting attention from the true victim, which are the children.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 10:33 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's the same reason they don't want to acknowledge that homos and trannies are doing these things BY CHOICE and are not born that way.
Why do people still say things like this?
Actions are chosen. So yeah, people choose to dress as the opposite gender and/or have gay sex.
But people who are really gay/trans (and I get that there's way more Gen-Zers responding to a social contagion than there are really gay/trans people) do not have a choice about how they feel on the inside.
I'm not saying they have to indulge any feelings they have any more than I think a straight guy needs to indulge feelings he might have for screwing his wife's best friend, but why can't people just admit that some people are just gay? They do not experience any physical attraction to the opposite sex, but instead are very attracted to members of their own sex? Why is that impossible for some people to admit?
The whole, "It's not a choice!" "Yes it is" debate is so pointless and I can't understand why people argue over it so much. It doesn't matter whether the feelings are a choice or whether the feelings are the result of a gene or some other factor that the person cannot control.
Pedophilia doesn't appear to be a choice. It's still not appropriate to indulge in. Alcoholism/addiction doesn't appear to be a choice. It's still not appropriate to indulge in.
Something doesn't have to be a choice for it to not be o.k. to act on.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 11:37 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
whether the feelings are a choice or whether the feelings are the result of a gene
This has been determined not true already
It's like science, man.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 11:40 pm to SaintsReportExile
typical leftists language designed to create victimhood.
Posted on 11/20/23 at 11:52 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
But people who are really gay/trans (and I get that there's way more Gen-Zers responding to a social contagion than there are really gay/trans people) do not have a choice about how they feel on the inside.
You answered your own question. There is frequently a social/choice component to the behavior. You’re oversimplifying it just as much in the opposite direction.
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:14 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
This has been determined not true already
It's like science, man.
So what? The point is that it doesn't matter.
And btw, that's not what "has been determined." "What has been determined" is that they haven't yet found a gene or combination of genes that they can definitively say causes people to be gay. They could find it tomorrow. Not that it would matter.
THAT'S actually "science, man."
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:17 am to Flats
quote:
You answered your own question. There is frequently a social/choice component to the behavior. You’re oversimplifying it just as much in the opposite direction.
How I am oversimplifying anything by observing that it doesn't matter what the cause is for people who are really gay, a group that I clearly differentiated from those just following a social fad? As in, those responding to an internal motivation as opposed to an outside motivation.
I'm not trying to explain why it happens. I don't care. I'm saying it doesn't matter.
Homosexual relations are objectively more destructive. There is more disease and injury associated with it, a higher rate of domestic violence (for both men and women) and as much as the LGBTQ community want people to think that they are just like everyone else with one little difference, there's also a much higher rate of promiscuity, infidelity, and fetishism associated with it. That's why when you go to a PRIDE parade, you don't see two men wearing khakis and oxford shirts holding hands on a float, you see grown men wearing diapers, buttless leather chaps, dressed like drag queens, or wearing dog collars and bondage equipment with chains attached to their nipples.
I don't care whether a gene makes people attracted to that sort of thing or environment, or a combination of the two or whether it's just a culture that looked appealing to someone.
It's no less distorted, detrimental, and unhealthy whether they do it because they chose it or because it chose them. Neither side in that debate has won any moral ground or justified the behavior (or not) regardless of which it happens to be. That's the point.
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 7:13 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News